The petitioners sought direction restraining the Prada from commercialising and using the ‘Toe ring sandals,’ claiming that the same was originally ‘Kolhapuri Chappal’ and they cannot use the sameSix Pune-based lawyers on Friday approached the Bombay High Court with a PIL seeking action against Italian luxury brand Prada that allegedly showcased footwear resembling Kolhapuri Chappal in its Spring-Summer 2026 menswear collection.The petitioners claimed that Kolhapuri Chappal was already protected as a Geographical Indication (GI) under the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act and is a ‘cultural symbol’ of Maharashtra.The petitioners sought direction restraining the Prada from commercialising and using the ‘Toe ring sandals,’ claiming that the same was originally ‘Kolhapuri Chappal’ and they cannot use the same without any authorisation availed from registered proprietor or authorised users.The PIL further sought public apology from Prada acknowledging alleged unauthorised use of ‘Kolhapuri Chappal’ and ensure that no such use will occur in future and to expressly recognise the rights of the Indian artisans’ community.The plea further sought compensation to the artisans’ community for ‘reputational and economic damages.’ The petitioners further sought action against the Italian brand for allegedly violating rights of GI registered proprietors and authorised users, artisans.The PIL further sought framing of guidelines for licensing and collaboration for use of registered GI products by International brands, to initiate awareness and measures to protect Kolhapuri Chappal and other GI products from unauthorised use.Pending hearing of the plea, the PIL sought damages and compensation towards artisans and also sought direction to restrain Prada from marketing, selling and exploiting their concerned sandals.Story continues below this adThe PIL claimed that while Prada privately accepted that its collection was inspired by Indian artisans, it has not issued any formal apology or compensation to the original artisans and private acknowledgement appeared to be ‘superficial attempt to deflect criticism.’The court will hear the PIL in due course.Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram© The Indian Express Pvt LtdTags:Bombay High Court