Land of a ‘fair go’ or Fortress Australia? A globetrotting journalist questions Australia’s myths – and nationality itself

Wait 5 sec.

Desire paths – trails formed by people or animals taking the most logical and convenient route, rather than the approved pathways set out by bitumen, gravel and signage – are having a moment. Tens of thousands have contributed snaps of them to Reddit threads. Urban planners study them. My own 13-year-old, factoid-obsessed son recently brought up the term while we were walking the dog. Equally mundane and profound, these foot-traffic-forged paths have become modern-day symbols of human agency and the triumph of common sense over authority. Review: Desire Paths – Megan Clements (Ultimo)Paris-based journalist and former Melburnian Megan Clement adds depth to the term with her memoir, Desire Paths. In it, she reflects on her own life path, in her work and as a teenage migrant to Australia from the United Kingdom. She has crisscrossed the globe, most recently from France to Australia and back again many times, during COVID-19 lockdowns and her father’s terminal illness. London, Stoke-on-Trent, Harare and Mexico have all been part of the mix, too.Alternating between the personal and geopolitical, Clement contemplates paths taken by choice, by chance and for lack of other options. Why do some get to choose desire paths, while those most in need, like asylum seekers, are imprisoned for following them? Journalist Megan Clement reflects on her globetrotting life and work in her memoir. Ultimo The lucky country?Desire Paths begins at that unsettling moment in early 2020, when the pandemic was twisting billions of life trajectories in unwanted directions, as the world’s borders closed. It centres on Clement’s return to Melbourne’s inner north-east to be with her father in his last weeks, after his chemo treatment has stopped working. Metres from her teenage family home, looking down from an Airbnb window at the desire paths in East Brunswick’s Fleming Park, Clement reflects on the path that brought her to this point. Clement was in Mexico on a journalism fellowship when COVID-19 hit. She considers race and the “false typologies of the migrant”: the different receptions afforded to millions of desperate people trying to reach the United States and Europe, versus her family’s relatively easy arrival to settle in Australia from the UK in 2000. She reflects on the myths Australia tells itself:Australia the lucky country, the safe country, the sane country, the liveable country with the spirit of the ‘fair go’. What underpins these assumptions – all of them wrong, none of them applicable to its First Nations People, nor its poor, its sick, its racial or religious minorities, its elderly – is an idea that is much more dangerous and more real. Australia: the fortress.Clement tests negative, and is allowed to spend time with her parents, helping-without-hugging. As lockdowns sweep the globe, with her partner, home and dog back in Paris, she is faced with a choix cornélien – an impossible choice. Return to France while she can and risk not being able to come back, or stay in fortress Australia, unable to get out. Her dad convinces her to return to France, but weeks later, as the reality of his imminent mortality sets in, Clement is back in Melbourne, in quarantine at the Airport Holiday Inn, with time on her hands to contemplate the inequalities and injustices of a world gone mad. The failings of hotel quarantine soon become apparent, as guards without tenure or training allow the virus to seep out with inconsistent hygiene and protective personal equipment (PPE) practices. Clement informs the media anonymously, then questions her own sanity. Why ruffle feathers and risk the reprisal of not being allowed compassionate visits to see her dad? Her reports hit the national news and she blows her own cover on Twitter (now X), then cops digital flack for putting her head above the parapet. “This is a public health emergency, Karen! one anonymous Australian tweets at me, cutting right to the heart of my worst fears about myself,” she writes. Global livesPrivileged princess or justified critic/provocateur? The second half of Desire Paths reveals more about Clement and her family, putting paid to the slight of “first world problems” often levelled at middle-class women who dare to complain about anything at all. They may be comparatively privileged as white, English-speaking migrants, but like everyone, they have their share of adversity and heartbreak.After a tough childhood in Bournemouth, where his mother died when he was ten, Clement’s dad David “looked at what he had been handed and decided to spend the rest of his life having fun”. He entered university in the late 1960s not knowing how to tie his shoelaces. There, he met her mum. Clement’s parents got together the following decade. They moved to Tennessee and later Zimbabwe, as idealistic young progressives keen to be part of a fledgling democratic socialist paradise and refuge from Thatcher’s neoliberalist UK, where Clement was born. When the Mugabe dream turned into a nightmare, the young family returned to England, settling in stuffy Stoke-on-Trent for ten years, before escaping to Melbourne.Clement studied linguistics and became a journalist, moving to Paris in 2015 to cover the climate talks. She arrived as France was reeling following the November 13 Islamic State attacks, where 130 people were killed by multiple suicide bombers and shootings around Paris. Her description of the atmosphere is vivid: refusing to perpetuate the generic “Paris attacks” term, she names the bombers and describes their actions and effects, as well the Parisian libertarian spirit and push to get people back out in the bars and bistros. After reporting on Malcolm Turnbull’s ham-fisted showing at the climate talks, when out drinking Clement clashed with an Australian journo who insisted Scott Morrison was a “nice guy”. They claimed Morrison was more accessible – and therefore more competent – than his soon-to-be predecessor. How, Clement wonders, could political journalists swallow such spin about a man instrumental in designing Australia’s most inhumane asylum seeker policies – which continue to this day?Memoir or manifesto?A dilemma facing every memoir writer must surely be how much intimate detail to reveal about one’s self, friends and family. (Bob Dylan, for one, focused more on the music in his autobiography, Chronicles, only briefly mentioning his wife and kids.) Clement treads the middle ground here, painting a sympathetic portrait of her father and touching upon selected defining moments in her life, without going into a great deal of detail around other close relationships.More than a personal account of an interesting life in turbulent times, this book sets its sights on something broader. What starts as a personal account of the trauma and grief of watching a parent die in lockdown expands to an insightful meditation: on Australia, its place in the world and the often unedifying politics of citizenship. Her path is unique, but Clement’s experience and criticisms of Australia’s blind spots will resonate with much of this country’s majority first- and second-generation migrant population. Her decision to live abroad, away from family, comes with its own misgivings: would life be less painful settled in one country, not torn between people and places without a permanent sense of home? C’est la vie. If the pandemic taught us anything, it’s that life’s short and freedom is not a given. Better to live large while you can.Charlotte Chalklen does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.