The Atlantic’s July Cover Story: Elizabeth Bruenig’s “Witness,” on Sin and Redemption in America’s Death Chambers

Wait 5 sec.

“Capital punishment operates according to an emotional logic,” staff writer Elizabeth Bruenig writes in her July cover story for The Atlantic. “Vengeance is elemental. Injustice cries out for redress. Murder is the most horrifying of crimes, and it seems only fitting to pair it with the most horrifying of punishments.” But as a Christian—embracing the doctrine that we’re all sinners in need of redemption—Bruenig explains that she is interested in forgiveness and mercy, which are “some of my faith’s most stringent dictates. If those forms of compassion are possible for murderers, then they’re possible for everyone.” For her first Atlantic cover story, Bruenig draws on the past five years of her reporting on death row. Bruenig has witnessed five executions of death-row inmates, and has also helped bring attention to the prevalence of botched executions: that is, the seeming inability of executioners in some states to kill the condemned humanely. Further, she has formed relationships, even friendships, with prisoners awaiting execution. In 2023, Bruenig was named a Pulitzer finalist for her reporting on Alabama’s death row. Alabama has now banned Bruenig from its prisons.In an editor’s note to lead the issue, also published today, The Atlantic’s editor in chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, writes that Bruenig “possesses an almost-otherworldly toughness that has allowed her to witness, again and again, the unnatural act of state-sanctioned killing,” adding that Bruenig “does not flinch from any of the ugliness of capital punishment, and, crucially, she does not flinch from the appalling crimes committed by so many of the men on death row.” Goldberg continues: “For understandable reasons, people turn away from the subject of capital punishment. But Liz has done a remarkable thing here—she has written a propulsive narrative about redemption and sin and invested her story with humanity and grace.”Also accompanying the article is a series of original paintings by The Atlantic’s creative director, Peter Mendelsund, including a striking cover image of a corridor leading to an execution chamber, and a prisoner lying on the table within it.When she witnessed her first execution, Bruenig writes: “The only certainty I had going into the Indiana death chamber in December 2020 was the simple sense that it’s generally wrong to kill people, even bad people. What I witnessed on this occasion and the ones that came after has not changed my conviction that capital punishment must end. But in sometimes-unexpected ways, it has changed my understanding of why.”Bruenig writes that “capital punishment as an institution relies on judgment at every level: judgment about guilt, about fairness, about proportion, about pain and cruelty, about the possibility of redemption. Judgment about how to carry out a death sentence and how to behave as one does so. And then there is the judgment that must be directed at oneself and one’s community—the distant, sometimes-forgotten participants. In all of this, I see the arc of my own evolving comprehension.”The cover story also addresses how these questions have touched her own family’s life: When Bruenig’s sister-in-law was murdered, nearly a decade ago, her husband and father-in-law both stood opposed to the death penalty. (The killer was ultimately sentenced to 40 years in prison.)“Choosing mercy is the moral path even in the hardest cases—even if you believe that some people deserve execution,” Bruenig writes, “and even if you know for a fact that the person in question is guilty and unrepentant.” She writes: “To default to mercy is to impose limitations on one’s own power to retaliate, and to acknowledge our flawed nature. To a Christian, mercy derives from charity. And in the liminal space where families of murder victims are recruited into the judicial process—to either bless or condemn a prosecutor’s intentions—­showing mercy is an especially heroic decision. To think this way is to understand that the moral dimension of capital punishment is not just about what we do to others. It’s also about what we do to ourselves.”Elizabeth Bruenig’s “Witness” was published today at TheAtlantic.com. Please reach out with any questions or requests to interview Bruenig on her reporting.Press contacts:Anna Bross and Paul Jackson | The Atlanticpress@theatlantic.com