Background: The main cause of urinary tract infections (UTIs) are Gram negative bacteria with Escherichia coli as the leading cause and other important pathogens such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeuriginosa and Enterococcus faecalis. Over the years uropathogens have become resistant to commonly used antibiotics, including penicillin's, cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in UTIs is mainly caused by the misuse and overuse of antibiotics, recurrent infections, and healthcare-associated factors such as catheterization. Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the bacteriological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of uropathogens isolated from positive urine cultures at Chhatrapati Shivaji Subharti Hospital, Meerut, a tertiary care centre in North India and develop an institutional antibiogram to support empirical prescribing and antibiotic stewardship at this institution. Materials & Methods: The study analysed 50 positive urine culture samples and their antimicrobial susceptibility records from July 2025 to December 2025. The isolates were identified, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disc diffusion method and automated Biomerieux Vitek 2 Compact machine. The collected data was analysed using descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test. Results: Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 80.0% (40/50) of the culture-positive urine isolates. Escherichia coli was the most frequently isolated uropathogen (n=23, 46.0%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=12, 24.0%), Candida spp. (n=6, 12.0%), Enterococcus spp. (n=4,8.0%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=3, 6.0%), and Enterobacter cloacae (n=2, 4.0%). Of the total, 74% (37/50) of isolates came from Inpatient samples. E. coli had a 100% resistance to ampicillin and ceftriaxone, 95.7% to ciprofloxacin and cefepime, and 73.9% to meropenem, with fosfomycin (86.4% sensitive) and colistin (69.6% sensitive) as the only effective antimicrobials. K. pneumoniae had 100% resistance to ceftriaxone, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and piperacillintazobactam; carbapenem resistance ranged from 83.3% to 91.7%, and colistin was the only consistently effective treatment (83.3% sensitive). Of all the 35 tested Enterobacteriaceae isolates, Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBLs) positivity was 100% with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) positivity at 85.0%. All the bacterial isolates met Multi-drug Resistant (MDR) criteria. 31 of 35 (88.6%) tested Enterobacteriaceae isolates showed ESBL and CRE copositivity. The six strains of Candida demonstrated total sensitivity to all the antifungal drugs used. Conclusion: There is a critical burden of AMR at this hospital with 100% ESBL positivity, 85% CRE, and 100% MDR among all bacterial isolates. This study provides the first baseline institutional antibiogram to guide empirical prescribing and antibiotic stewardship at Chhatrapati Subharti Hospital.