Been reviewing more LinkedIn drafts than usual lately. The thing that keeps catching me: the AI-tell isn't the word choice anymore. Clients are stripping "let's dive in" and "I'm excited to share." But readers still smell AI. The problem moved to structure. Five patterns I keep catching: Sentence-length uniformity. AI writes 8-12 word sentences consistently. Humans vary wildly. 3 words. Then 22. Then 7. The rhythm gives it away before any word does. Parallel-structure bullets. Every bullet starts with the same word or grammatical structure. Looks clean. Reads robotic. The rhetorical-question hook → answer punchline → CTA closer template. Same shape every post. Readers register the template before the content. Conclusion that summarizes the post you just read. Humans rarely do this. AI does it every time. Sentence-per-line dramatic-effect formatting. Doesn't. Add. The. Drama. People. Think. The fix: read the draft out loud. If it sounds like every other LinkedIn post in the client's competitor space, the structure is the problem, not the words. Curious, what structural AI-tell catches your eye fastest when reviewing client work?   submitted by   /u/Ok-Childhood-5005 [link]   [comments]