4 min readNew DelhiUpdated: May 14, 2026 01:25 PM ISTThe petitioner’s counsel argued that he was falsely implicated in the case and has been in custody for the last five months and 11 days. (Image generated using AI)Punjab and Haryana High Court news: The Punjab and Haryana High Court recently granted bail to a Rapido cab driver accused in a case involving the seizure of 15,000 tramadol tablets from his cab, while observing that the contraband prima facie appeared to belong to customers who had booked the cab through the app and were allegedly carrying it in bags kept on the rear seat of the vehicle.Hearing the plea of a Rapido driver, Justice Subhas Mehla pointed out that the concession of bail cannot be denied merely as a measure of punishment, and that it is a trite principle of criminal jurisprudence that bail is the rule and jail is the exception. Justice Subhas Mehla held that no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the cab driver in custody for any further period. (AI-enhanced image)“As per the state’s reply, the petitioner was not in contact with the co-accused prior to booking the cab. So, at this stage for disposal of present petition, prima facie, the contraband appears to belong to the customer of the cab (i.e. co-accused), though it remains a moot question to be adjudicated during trial,” the May 4 order read.Also Read | ‘Global crisis’: Punjab and Haryana High Court denies bail to man held with 2.7 kg of opium, cites rising drug menaceThe Punjab and Haryana High Court was hearing the bail plea of a Rapido driver, Ram Kumar Pandey, who was arrested in November 2025 with tramadol tablets. Tramadol is an opioid medication used to treat pain in adults.‘Clean, clear antecedents’The petitioner is a cab driver and was operating a cab that had been booked by the co-accused through the ‘Rapido’ app, the Punjab and Haryana High Court observed.The court also noted that the co-accused, who was a customer, was apprehended in possession of contraband from the rear seat of the car.Noting that the petitioner has been behind bars since November 2025 and has clean and clear antecedents, the court held that no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping him in custody for any further period.The Punjab and Haryana High Court held that, based on the facts and circumstances of the case, there is merit in the present petition filed by the Rapido driver.Rapido booking, arrest and caseThe case arises from the allegations that on November 19, 2025, two bags were recovered from the back seat of the car, from which 800 and 700 strips of tablets, containing a total of 15,000 tablets, were recovered. The petitioner was the driver of the vehicle and he was travelling in the car along with the co-accused Aman and Mohamad Arshad.Also Read | Can’t expect ‘sphinx-like’ attitude from judge: Allahabad High Court rejects case transfer plea over remarks during hearingOn a specific query posed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court as to whether the petitioner was in contact with the co-accused, it was submitted that during the investigation, it was found that he was not in touch with them before the booking of his cab through the Rapido application.‘Falsely implicated’Appearing for the petitioner, advocate Atul Aggarwal argued that he was falsely implicated in the present case, as it was the co-accused who were apprehended with the contraband in the petitioner’s cab.It was further added that no recovery was effected from the petitioner, and he has been in custody for the last five months and 11 days.The counsel emphasised that the petitioner has clean and clear antecedents, and the trial of the case will take sufficient time to conclude.Deputy advocate general Sandeep Kumar argued before the Punjab and Haryana High Court that the recovery of 15,000 tablets of tramadol, was made from the car of the petitioner, which falls under commercial quantity.It was further added that the present petitioner was apprehended with the co-accused, who were apprehended with the contraband at that time.Richa Sahay is a Legal Correspondent for The Indian Express, where she focuses on simplifying the complexities of the Indian judicial system. A law postgraduate, she leverages her advanced legal education to bridge the gap between technical court rulings and public understanding, ensuring that readers stay informed about the rapidly evolving legal landscape. Expertise Advanced Legal Education: As a law postgraduate, Richa possesses the academic depth required to interpret intricate statutes and constitutional nuances. Her background allows her to provide more than just summaries; she offers context-driven analysis of how legal changes impact the average citizen. Specialized Beat: She operates at the intersection of law and public policy, focusing on: Judicial Updates: Providing timely reports on orders from the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts. Legal Simplification: Translating dense "legalese" into accessible, engaging narratives without sacrificing factual accuracy. Legislative Changes: Monitoring new bills, amendments, and regulatory shifts that shape Indian society. ... Read More © IE Online Media Services Pvt LtdAdvertisementLoading Recommendations...AdvertisementLive BlogWBCHSE West Bengal HS Result 2026 Live Updates: 64 students feature in top 10 merit list5 minutes agoWBCHSE West Bengal HS 12th Result 2026, Wbchse.wb.gov.in LIVE: Adrito Pal tops Uchch Madhyamik HS Result5 minutes agoNews Today Live Updates, 14 May | NEET paper leak: It’s ‘not a big deal’, says Rajasthan Education Minister Dilawar6 minutes agoHBSE 10th Result 2026, bseh.org.in Live Updates: Rural area students outperform urban, check marks at digilocker.gov.in9 minutes agoTrump-Xi Summit LIVE: Taiwan thanks US for support after China’s ‘conflict’ warning if issue mishandled25 minutes ago