Thirty-one years after his abduction and custodial death in 1995, Punjab’s human rights crusader Jaswant Singh Khalra is back in public discourse, after his biopic Satluj was removed from an OTT platform and banned in India within 48 hours of its release on July 3. On Saturday, the movie was also pulled off internationally from the platform.Known as Laawaris laashan da waaris (guardian of unclaimed bodies), Khalra, 42, had rattled the Punjab Police and the then Congress government with his work on Punjab’s ‘disappearing’ men. Khalra was documenting the alleged illegal cremations of thousands of bodies during Punjab’s militancy years, after the police had branded them “unclaimed or unidentified”.Also Read | Jaswant Singh Khalra: The man who counted the missingHis disappearance in 1995 prompted a Supreme Court-ordered CBI probe into both his abduction and the alleged illegal cremations. In 2011, the Supreme Court upheld life imprisonment for five Punjab policemen, including a DSP, for Khalra’s murder.Here’s a look at how the Khalra custodial murder case and the Punjab extra judicial killings case have been legally documented, from the CBI to the Supreme Court.How Khalra’s case reached Supreme Court: Telegram by SGPC chief, wife’s petitionSoon after Khalra was abducted from his house in Kabir Park of Amritsar city on September 6, 1995, Gurcharan Singh Tohra, the then president of Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) and a senior leader of the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD), sent a telegram to Justice Kuldip Singh, which he acknowledged receiving on September 7, 1995.The telegram stated that Khalra, who was then the general secretary, Human Rights Wing, of SAD, was “kidnapped by the police.” Treating the telegram as a habeas corpus petition, the Supreme Court issued notice to the Punjab home secretary, the director general of police (DGP), and SSP Amritsar.Meanwhile, Khalra’s wife Paramjit Kaur Khalra also filed a habeas corpus plea in the Supreme Court, under Article 32 of the Constitution. According to the petition, Paramjit also stated that her husband was investigating “unclaimed dead bodies” and police excesses, and used to encourage families of victims to file writs in courts. She further stated the she “strongly believes that her husband was picked up at the instance of Ajit Singh Sandhu, then SSP Tarn Taran, who had “several such allegations pending against him.”Story continues below this adThe Amritsar Police in its affidavit in the court said that “Khalra was neither arrested nor wanted by us in any criminal case.” SSP Sandhu claimed in the court on September 23, 1995 that he “never threatened Khalra”, and “never forced him to withdraw writ petitions filed against police excesses, custodial deaths etc.” The SSP also claimed he was on leave from September 5 to 11 for his daughter’s wedding in Chandigarh.Khalra’s press note on mass illegal cremationsThus, Paramjit Kaur Khalra did not seek a probe only into her husband’s disappearance, she also placed before the court Khalra’s investigation of the alleged fake encounters and illegal cremations by Punjab Police.What became the basis for a CBI investigation was a press note issued by Khalra and his associate, Jaspal Singh Dhillon, on January 16, 1995.Placed before the Supreme Court, the press note revealed: “The investigation team decided to work in Amritsar and its neighboring police districts. It was learnt that police regularly brings bodies to municipality cremation grounds for cremation, declaring them as unclaimed… The only record available is through firewood receipts which were issued to dispose these bodies.”Story continues below this adThe note added, “In Amritsar district, maximum unclaimed bodies were brought for cremation near Durgiana Mandir. From June 1, 1984 to end of 1994, about 2000 bodies have been cremated as unclaimed. During first year of the government of (then Punjab chief minister) Beant Singh and 300 bodies were brought to Durgiana Mandir cremation ground. While 41 died of bullet injuries or police encounters, no reason was recorded for rest of 259 persons. No postmortem conducted on 276 bodies.”While Jaswant Singh Khalra and his wife always maintained that “at least 25,000 such disappearances of youths happened across Punjab during the militancy period”, as shown in the film, the “press note” submitted in the Supreme Court was focused on 2,097 such bodies in Amritsar district alone.Landmark SC orderClubbing Tohra’s telegram and Paramjit’s petition, the Supreme Court Bench of Justice Kuldip Singh and Justice S Saghir Ahmad, in a landmark order on November 15, 1995, appointed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to investigate both Khalra’s disappearance and the alleged extra-judicial killings in Punjab.Excerpts from the order state: “Court cannot close its eyes to the contents of the press note…even if partially true it would be a gory tale of human rights violations.”CBI files reportStory continues below this adOn July 22, 1996, the Supreme Court acknowledged the CBI’s 74-page findings, which said that “prima facie, it has been found that a total of 984 bodies were cremated as “lavaris” by the police in Tarn Taran police district.” The CBI said in the court that probe was still ongoing.‘Worst crime against humanity’Meanwhile, the CBI on July 30, 1996, informed the apex court that it had decided to prosecute nine policemen, Ajit Singh Sandhu, SSP Tarn Taran; Ashok Kumar, DSP, Bhikhiwind; Jaspal Singh, DSP, Tarn Taran; Sub-inspector/SHO Satnam Singh (Jhabal police station), S-I Surinderpal Singh (Sirhali police station), SI Jasbir Singh (Manochacha police station), SI Rachpal Singh (Kang PS), ASI Amarjit Singh and head constable Pirthipal Singh, for Khalra’s abduction.However, Khalra’s whereabouts remained unknown even a year after he was picked up.In another landmark order on August 7, 1996, the Supreme Court said that Paramjit Kaur Khalra was undergoing the “worst crime against humanity.”Story continues below this ad“… She has been running from pillar to post…Kidnapping of a person whose family is totally in dark about his whereabout – even about the fact where he is dead or alive – is the worst crime against humanity,” said the court, while directing the Punjab government to pay interim relief of Rs 10 lakh to the family.CBI submits final report, NHRC roped inAfter the CBI submitted its final report into the alleged illegal mass cremations of 2,097 bodies in Amritsar district, the Supreme Court on December 12, 1996 said: “The report is self explanatory and speaks for itself… Report indicates that 585 bodies were fully identified, 274 partially identified and 1238 unidentified. The report discloses flagrant violation of human rights on a mass scale.”The SC ordered that the report be sent to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in a “sealed cover”, while directing the CBI to “continue the probe and register cases”, and present the “status report” in the court “every three months.” It directed the NHRC to see that family/heirs of the 585 identified people get adequate compensation under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.Khalra’s murder confirmed only after 3 yearsOn March 2, 1998, Kuldip Singh Bachra, then special police officer attached with SHO Satnam Singh, told the CBI that Khalra was “murdered secretly and his body thrown into the canal near Harike (the river Sutlej) at midnight just after Diwali” in 1995. His body was never recovered. Bachra also said Khalra had been tortured in custody.Story continues below this adHe also said he could not reveal these details earlier out of fear of then SSP Ajit Singh Sandhu, who allegedly died by suicide during the trial in 1997. Later, the CBI confirmed the date of Khalra’s murder as October 27, 1995.