Seven Senate Democrats who voted against advancing the CLARITY Act have reaffirmed their commitment to passing the legislation through bipartisan negotiations. According to crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett, Senators Kirsten Gillibrand, Angela Alsobrooks, Cory Booker, Catherine Cortez Masto, Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner and Raphael Warnock said the 49-50 Senate vote was a setback but not the end of efforts to advance the bill. Their statement comes as lawmakers and crypto industry figures debate the reasons behind the vote and the path forward for US digital asset regulation. NEW: A group of seven Senate Democrats, including @gillibrandny, @MarkWarner, @SenRubenGallego and @Sen_Alsobrooks, say they are “committed to working in a bipartisan fashion” to pass the Clarity Act.The statement comes amid early efforts to restart bipartisan talks and gauge… pic.twitter.com/zJV1G08RQ3— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) September 17, 2026Seven Democrats Renew Bipartisan Push for CLARITY ActThe Democratic senator said that the Senate vote was a pushback, but not the end of that important work. They bolstered their commitment to passing the CLARITY Act and working on a bipartisan basis. The new effort comes amid early conversations about restarting negotiations and evaluating whether lawmakers on both sides will return to the negotiating table. There are efforts to understand whether the bill could still be passed before the end of the year. The CLARITY Act would create a comprehensive federal framework for virtual assets, dividing oversight between the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The framework will address consumer rights and market integrity by establishing regulations for virtual asset markets. The Senate has also exercised disagreements over some provisions in the legislation. Senator Josh Hawley was one of the four Republicans who broke with their party and voted against advancing the crypto bill. Senator Thom Tillis also voted against the measure after switching his vote at the last minute. Hawley explained that his opposition was joined to the farmers and Missouri. He said agriculture is the state’s largest industry, and farmers were concerned they could have difficulty obtaining loans from small-town banks. This is when investors move money away from those banks to pursue yields available under the bill. Hawley said Senator Jerry Moran, who also voted against the legislation, had language that could tackle the concerns. Hawley described the issue as something that could be solved and said it was necessary to ensure that banks remain working, competitive, and capitalized to provide loans. John Deaton criticized Hawley’s reasoning, arguing the senator was mistaken about the issue and accusing him of protecting the current banking system from innovation. Other reactions to the Democratic push have also been divided. From the crypto community, Leo Lanza (a well-known influencer within the Ethereum community) argued the Democratic senator’s commitment to passing the Clarity Act could be connected to the pressure from crypto voters, while Nate Geraci characterized the new bipartisan statement as only discussion at this stage and pointed to the prior mentioned approach to crypto regulation.SEC Signals Action as Crypto Market Reacts to Senate Vote Amid this chaos, SEC Chair Paul Atkins posted on X and stated that the governance action will go on regardless of whether the Congress passes the CLARITY Act or not. Atkins showed gratitude towards those who worked on the legislation and said, with or without legislation, the SEC would act within its designated authority to provide clarity for American stakeholders. His remarks indicate that the agency plans to continue their work on crypto-related governance issues even as the legislative remains ambiguous.My thanks go to everyone who put so much effort into the CLARITY Act— across the Administration, Congress, investors, and innovators. Our collective conviction that America must continue to lead is indispensable.I have been unequivocal: with or without legislation, we will act…— Paul Atkins (@SECPaulSAtkins) September 16, 2026Senator Dave McCormick came in support of Atkins position, saying that the CLARITY Act’s failure to move ahead should not result in consistent governance uncertainty. McCormick said he was encouraged that the SEC could use its current authority to provide better clarity for stakeholders. This would be done by keeping the financial innovation within the United States.McCormick also said Congress still has a duty to act and that he would continue working to pass the CLARITY Act. The Senate pushback also had a consequent effect on the crypto market. Bitcoin dipped to just under $75,000 before recovering to around $76,000, down 3.79%. XRP was down 9.74%, while total crypto market capitalization stood near $2.59 trillion, down 3.63%.The market reaction came amidst the future of the alleged framework remained undecided. With the bill unable to get the required votes, the focus has shifted towards the bipartisan negotiations. For the crypto niche, the next steps could involve both the administration and financial regulators. Lawmakers may attempt to restart bipartisan discussions, while the SEC has hinted that it will continue pursuing regulatory certainty within its present authority.