Sony FE 400mm F4.5 GM OSS / Sony FE 600mm F6.3 GM OSS: One-minute reviewI've only just had my hands on the Fujifilm XF 400mm F4.5 R OIS LM WR lens, photographing birds of prey in flight, but I can now reveal that I was also testing two rival super-telephoto Sony primes at the same time ahead of their launch; the FE 400mm F4.5 GM OSS and FE 600mm F6.3 GM OSS. Both lenses sit within the focal length range of Sony's longest zoom lens — the 400-800mm F6.3-8 G OSS — but they sacrifice zoom versatility for a couple of real benefits: they have a slightly brighter maximum aperture, and they're significantly lighter. In fact, Sony's new 400mm and 600mm primes are the lightest of their kind, weighing 994g / 995g respectively (35oz approx). It's the light weight that's their major appeal — plus the promise from Sony of superior MTF performance (the outright optical quality at the various lens settings) versus rivals, such as Nikon's 400mm f/4.5 VR S.The 600mm lens is physically the slightly longer of the two lenses, but they otherwise appear largely identical. (Image credit: Future)There's no shortage of super-telephoto lenses from Sony, but these primes are probably the best option for enthusiasts who know their focal length and want to prioritize quality over zoom versatility. They're way more affordable options than Sony's high-end 400mm F2.8 and 600mm F4 pro primes, but they still boast the superior GM quality designation over comparable 'G' zooms such as the 200-600mm and 400-800mm, and are by no means cheap. If you mainly photograph larger wildlife, then the 400mm lens is ideal, while the 600mm lens is better suited for smaller creatures. I took both lenses to my local wetland reserve and to a nearby deer park to really test them out over hours-long hiking and photography sessions, and I was able to get a feel for how they sit with a Sony camera – in my case the A7 V that Sony loaned to me for this review — and how each one performed. Let's dive in.Sony FE 400mm F4.5 GM OSS / Sony FE 600mm F6.3 GM OSS: price and availabilityThe 400mm F4.5 GM OSS costs £2,400, while the 600mm F6.3 costs £3,300Both come in a soft padded case with handle and shoulder strap, and with a lens hoodBefore I get into the handling and performance of each lens, let's look at the pricing. In the UK the FE 400mm F4.5 GM OSS costs £2,400, while the FE 600mm F6.3 GM OSS costs £3,300. I'll update this page with US and Australia pricing when I get it.Each lens comes in a soft padded case with handle and shoulder strap, so they can be securely carried separately to a bag. A lens hood is supplied, too. To put that pricing into context, Fujifilm's new 400mm F4.5 lens (for APS-C with 600mm equivalent focal length) costs around the same, while the cost of Nikon's 400mm f/4.5 VR S has fallen by 15% since its 2022 launch, which takes it to the same price. The 600mm lens is cheaper compared to Nikon's 600mm f/6.3, which originally cost about 50% more, but with price reductions is currently about 25% more. Sony's professional FE 400mm F2.8 GM OSS and FE 600mm F4 GM OSS are in another (five-figure) price and weight category altogether. Though hardly cheap, considering the specs, and the fact that these are 'Grand Master' (GM) lenses — Sony's professional series — I think the pair are pretty decent value overall. Sony FE 400mm F4.5 GM OSS / Sony FE 600mm F6.3 GM OSS: specsSony FE 400mm F4.5 GM OSS / Sony FE 600mm F6.3 GM OSS specsType: Supertelephoto primeMount:Sony ESensor: Full-frameFocal length: 400mm and 600mm Aperture: f/4.5 and f/6.3 Minimum focus: 8.21ft / 2.5m (both)Filter size: 95mm (both)Dimensions: 108 x 242mm (400mm) / 108 x 263mm (600mm)Weight: 35oz / 994g and 995g respectively (bare lens)Sony FE 400mm F4.5 GM OSS / Sony FE 600mm F6.3 GM OSS: designLightest lenses of their kind at 994g (400mm) and 995g (600mm) respectivelyWeather resistant, with rubber sealed lens mountRemovable tripod collarFutureFutureFutureLight weight is the major talking point here. Both the FE 400mm F4.5 GM OSS and FE 600mm F6.3 GM OSS weigh a fraction under 1,000g (about 35oz), making them the lightest of their kind. For the wildlife and sports photography that these lenses are designed for, the light weight makes long shoot days more manageable — and I should know, because I've used them both extensively. Nikon's equivalent lenses are 1,160g and 1,360g respectively, while Sony's 400-800mm G lens weighs 87oz/2,475g — and Sony's high-end 400mm F2.8 and 600mm F4 primes are around 3x the weight of its new additions. There are other Sony zooms available; the pricier 100-400mm F4.5 GM OSS weighs 65oz/ 1,840g, while the lower-end FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3G OSS weighs 75oz/2,115g. Canon has no comparable lenses. As for size, the 400mm measures 242mm in length, and the 600mm 263mm in length — not the smallest of their kind, therefore, but definitely the lightest.FutureFutureFutureFutureFutureDespite the lightweight build, each lens is dust and moisture resistant, features a rubber ring to seal the lens mount, and includes Sony's Optical SteadyShot (OSS) — a key feature when shooting at such extreme focal lengths.There are five switches, covering off focus mode, a focus range limiter, optical stabilization and the stabilization mode, a function ring, plus four focus hold buttons. The tripod collar ring hosts a (removable) tripod mount. Like the rubberized function ring, the generous focus ring has pronounced ridging, which makes gripping and rotating it a cinch. (Image credit: Future)Both lenses support Sony's 1.4x and 2x teleconverters, the latter of which doubles the focal length, at the cost of maximum aperture. I preferred shooting without teleconverters, because aperture margins are amplified when shooting high-speed action with fast shutter speeds at such extreme focal lengths — every bit of additional brightness goes along way. Compared to Sony's pricier primes, the maximum aperture of each lens is less bright, being f/4.5 and f/6.3 respectively. However, the maximum aperture is brighter than the 400-800mm's, which is f/6.3 at 400mm, and f/8 when zoomed in to 600mm.Sony super-telephoto lenses for full-frame E-mountLensPriceWeight400mm F4.5 GM OSS£2,40035oz/994g600mm F6.3 GM OSS£3,30035oz/995g100-400mm F4.5 GM OSS$4,299 / £4,39965oz/ 1,840g400-800mm F6.3-8 G OSS$2,699 / £2,39987oz/2,475g100-400mm F4.5-5.6 GM $2,799 / £2,14949oz/1395g200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS$2,099 / £1,59975oz/2,115g400mm F2.8 GM OSS$12,999 / £10,490102oz/2,895g600mm F4 GM OSS$14,099 / £11,999107oz/3,040gSony FE 400mm F4.5 GM OSS / Sony FE 600mm F6.3 GM OSS: PerformanceSnappy and quiet internal autofocus when paired with a recent Sony camera11-blade aperture creates attractive, smooth bokehDetail is very sharp, especially when subjects are relatively closeTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanBoth lenses feature a fairly complex optical construction, comprising extra-low dispersion elements to minimize chromatic aberration, Sony's Nano AR Coating II to reduce flare and ghosting, plus an 11-blade aperture for what Sony calls "gorgeous ball bokeh". Twin XD linear motors drive those lens elements for fast, precise autofocus and tracking, being able to support tracking up to 120fps — which covers 4x slow-motion video recording.With the appropriate bird, animal and insect detection in play for taking photos of birds, deer and dragonflies respectively, autofocus proved swift and reliable. Only for photos of large mammals using the maximum aperture, did I see the occasional softness,where focusing was slightly off from the creature's eyes.Tim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanI used the maximum aperture of each lens for the majority of the photos I took, and image quality is impressive — you can see for yourself in the gallery of some of my favorite shots below. There's no particular sign of vignetting at the maximum aperture, while chromatic aberration is well controlled. Bokeh is smooth, too, while detail in subjects, provided they're not too far away and they're in focus, is crisp. When depth of field is narrow and subjects are at some distance, images benefit from a little sharpening, but otherwise I'm really happy with the photos I took. The original images you see in the galleries are converted RAW files, which are largely unedited — I haven't applied any sharpening. Tim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanShould I buy?(Image credit: Future)Buy it if...You want a high-quality, super-telephoto prime that's easy on the bodySony's GM-quality optics, in a lightest-of-their-kind body — these are dreamy lenses for long days photographing wildlife and sports.You're an enthusiast wildlife photographer with deep pocketsThey're more affordable than Sony's high-end 400mm and 600mm lenses (but by no means cheap), and with a slighter smaller maximum aperture.Don't buy it if...You want zoom versatilitySony has compelling zoom lens alternatives for both of the 400mm and 600mm primes — so if you can live with the extra weight and, in some cases, slightly smaller maximum aperture, these alternatives could be a better bet.You're a casual wildlife and sports photographerUnless wildlife and sports photography are your thing, these lenses could be a little overkill. How I tested the Sony FE 400mm F4.5 GM OSS / Sony FE 600mm F6.3 GM OSS(Image credit: Future)Sony loaned me both 400mm and 600mm lenses weeks ahead of their unveilingI received the lenses with a Sony A7 V body to test themI used the lenses in proper wildlife photography scenarios and carried them over many hoursI was fortunate to receive both lenses from Sony, with an A7 V body, several weeks ahead of their announcement, and was able to give them a proper test in the scenarios that people would use them. I went to a wetland reserve to photography birdlife and insects including dragonflies, and to a historic park that's habited with deer. On multiple occasions I carried both lenses and camera over the course of several hours, and used the gear in bright daylight, under light rain, and as daylight faded. I mainly used the maximum aperture of each lens, but also stopped aperture down to make comparisons. I set the camera up specific to each scenario, with the appropriate subject detection autofocus. First reviewed September 2026