Legal AI has learned to summarise. But has it learned how lawyers think? Most AI tools read the whole document and decide on their own what matters. In my experience the real work of a lawyer is in that judgment i.e. reading, identifying what matters, spotting contradictions and connecting facts. One basic way lawyers exercise that judgment is that they read and they highlight. With that idea, I built "May or Shall". It is a Chrome extension, a website, a Windows and Mac app and also an app inside ChatGPT. You highlight the passages that matter on any web page, PDF or app, each line keeps its page and paragraph, you can tag it and link it to a line in another document, and then ChatGPT drafts from your own highlighted lines so each sentence can be checked against its source. Human judgment first. AI drafting follows. It is live at app.mayorshall.com and there is a short video here: https://youtu.be/THYaz_bzjYI I would really value honest feedback, especially on whether the idea comes across in the first minute and what feels confusing.   submitted by   /u/siddiboyz [link]   [comments]