Objective A diversity of approaches and cohorts have been published in research literature for suicide risk estimation, leading to some uncertainty around which factors and conditions are most strongly contributing to risk. Methods exist for weighting estimates by propensity score, removing simplifying the interpretation of model effects. Few studies have explored the use of these tools to assess when the effect of certain factors is uncertain or inconsistent. Method A mix of 1,001,737 suicide decedents and living patients were evaluated for suicide risk, relying on a subset of commonly identified factors: demographics, psychiatric conditions, substance use disorders, and social needs. Care utilization patterns were then assessed controlling for these factors in a hospital care setting. Four methods were considered for controlling multivariate confounding of odds predicting death by suicide: multivariate logistic regression, 1-to-1 sample matching, inverse propensity weighting (IPTW), and entropy balancing (EBAL). Results Test statistics showed suicide decedents were much more likely to have various psychiatric and substance use diagnoses, social needs and more likely to heightened care utilization across sampling intervals. Greater utilization was found close to date of death. Effect sizes after IPTW and EBAL weighting were also generally greater than would have been documented by regression alone. Conclusions Propensity weighting is a useful alternative to exploring nuanced effects, especially when the direction and strength of an association differ from traditional statistics. By weighting, the overall imbalance of cases remains consistent and effect terms might reflect more nuanced associations than regression or sample matching alone.