The 2026 Commonwealth Short Story Prize was caught in a storm over charges of AI use in its winning entries.The point of literature, after all, is not merely to dazzle a reader with craftsmanship.AI Narration Listen 00:000.5x0.75x1x1.25x1.5x2xThank you for your feedback.Your feedback has been reported succesfully.2 min readOct 23, 2026 06:15 AM IST First published on: Oct 23, 2026 at 06:15 AM ISTIn 2023, a year after the launch of ChatGPT, the Authors Guild in the US, including writers such as John Grisham and George RR Martin, sued OpenAI, alleging that their copyrighted books had been used without permission to train its artificial intelligence models. Three years on, the literary establishment finds itself confronting a different stage of the same upheaval: Whether literature written with AI’s assistance should be formally recognised and rewarded. France’s new Prix Pascal de Littérature IA, an award for books co-written with artificial intelligence, suggests that the answer, for some, is to accept the inevitable and bring it into the open. But what becomes of the human process, then, that gives art its meaning?Recent controversies make that question more urgent. The 2026 Commonwealth Short Story Prize was caught in a storm over charges of AI use in its winning entries. Thélyson Orélien’s novel was removed from the Prix Goncourt longlist — France’s highest literary award — amid similar allegations.AdvertisementWhat is it, then, that a literary prize rewards? Is it the facility of a well-crafted sentence or the instant gratification of a neat turn of phrase? The point of literature, after all, is not merely to dazzle a reader with craftsmanship. It is work that is both interior and exterior — the rigour that follows inspiration, the daily drudgery of putting pen to paper, the frantic search for words that can capture the fullness of one’s experience. A machine may be taught to (re)produce the end product, if literature could even be classified as one. But, as Samuel Beckett wrote in Murphy (1938), “The sun shone, having no alternative, on the nothing new.” ShareWhatsapptwitterFacebook