​ Whenever I write copy myself and ask ChatGPT/Claude or another AI to critique it, it seems to find a ton of problems and often rates it around 5–6/10. But if I ask AI to write the copy first, then paste that copy into a fresh chat and ask it to critique/rate it, it often gives it a much higher score. It makes me wonder how reliable AI actually is for judging copy. Has anyone else tested this? Do you think AI has a bias toward the kind of writing AI itself produces, or am I just reading too much into it? And for people who use AI to improve their copy: how do you get useful feedback without letting it over-criticize or rewrite everything into generic AI copy? I came up with a formula called Master Blaster Space Research And both claud and gpt rejected it   submitted by   /u/Suspicious-Low-2234 [link]   [comments]