Halperin, E. C., Wazer, D. E., Blitzblau, R. C., Esiashvili, N. & Baumann, B. Perez, Brady, Halperin, and Wazer’s Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology 8th edn (Wolters Kluwer, 2025).Huynh, E. et al. Artificial intelligence in radiation oncology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 17, 771–781 (2020).Article PubMed Google Scholar Landry, G., Kurz, C. & Traverso, A. The role of artificial intelligence in radiotherapy clinical practice. BJR Open. 5, 20230030 (2023).PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Li, G., Wu, X. & Ma, X. Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy. Semin. Cancer Biol. 86, 160–171 (2022).Article PubMed Google Scholar El Naqa, I. & Murphy, M. J. Machine and Deep Learning in Oncology, Medical Physics and Radiology (Springer, 2022).Willoughby, T. R., Starkschall, G., Janjan, N. A. & Rosen, I. I. Evaluation and scoring of radiotherapy treatment plans using an artificial neural network. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 34, 923–930 (1996).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Rowbottom, C. G., Webb, S. & Oldham, M. Beam-orientation customization using an artificial neural network. Phys. Med. Biol. 44, 2251–2262 (1999).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Wells, D. M. & Niederer, J. A medical expert system approach using artificial neural networks for standardized treatment planning. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 41, 173–182 (1998).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar El Naqa, I. et al. Multivariable modeling of radiotherapy outcomes, including dose–volume and clinical factors. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 64, 1275–1286 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.022 (2006).Article PubMed Google Scholar El Naqa, I., Bradley, J. D., Lindsay, P. E., Hope, A. J. & Deasy, J. O. Predicting radiotherapy outcomes using statistical learning techniques. Phys. Med. Biol. 54, S9–S30 (2009).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Gulliford, S. L., Webb, S., Rowbottom, C. G., Corne, D. W. & Dearnaley, D. P. Use of artificial neural networks to predict biological outcomes for patients receiving radical radiotherapy of the prostate. Radiother. Oncol. 71, 3–12 (2004).Article PubMed Google Scholar Munley, M. T. et al. A neural network to predict symptomatic lung injury. Phys. Med. Biol. 44, 2241–2249 (1999).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Su, M. et al. An artificial neural network for predicting the incidence of radiation pneumonitis. Med. Phys. 32, 318–325 (2005).Article PubMed Google Scholar Ibragimov, B. & Xing, L. Segmentation of organs-at-risks in head and neck CT images using convolutional neural networks. Med. Phys. 44, 547–557 (2017).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Nikolov, S. et al. Clinically applicable segmentation of head and heck anatomy for radiotherapy: deep learning algorithm development and validation study. J. Med. Internet Res. 23, e26151 https://doi.org/10.2196/26151 (2021).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Nguyen, D. et al. A feasibility study for predicting optimal radiation therapy dose distributions of prostate cancer patients from patient anatomy using deep learning. Sci. Rep. 9, 1076 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37741-x (2019).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Nguyen, D. et al. 3D radiotherapy dose prediction on head and neck cancer patients with a hierarchically densely connected U-net deep learning architecture. Phys. Med. Biol. 64, 065020 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab039b (2019).Article PubMed Google Scholar Nguyen, D. et al. Three-dimensional radiotherapy dose prediction on head and neck cancer patients with a hierarchically densely connected U-net deep learning architecture. Phys. Med. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab039b (2018).Shen, C. et al. Intelligent inverse treatment planning via deep reinforcement learning, a proof-of-principle study in high dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Phys. Med. Biol. 64, 115013 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab18bf (2019).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Avanzo, M. et al. Machine and deep learning methods for radiomics. Med. Phys. 47, e185–e202 https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13678 (2020).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Coates, J. T. T., Pirovano, G. & El Naqa, I. Radiomic and radiogenomic modeling for radiotherapy: strategies, pitfalls, and challenges. J. Med. Imaging 8, 031902 (2021).Article Google Scholar Tseng, H. H., Luo, Y., Ten Haken, R. K. & El Naqa, I. The role of machine learning in knowledge-based response-adapted radiotherapy. Front. Oncol. 8, 266 (2018).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Tarhini, A. A., Dave, P. & El Naqa, I. General artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer: the rise of foundation models. BJR Artif Intell. 2, ubaf015 https://doi.org/10.1093/bjrai/ubaf015 (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Qi, X. S. et al. Generative AI, foundation models and large language models in radiation therapy physics: clinical applications, challenges, and future directions. Med. Phys. 53, e70616 https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.70616 (2026).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Deist, T. M. et al. Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: an empirical comparison of classifiers. Med. Phys. 45, 3449–3459 (2018).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Duke, K. & Papanikolaou, N. Artificial intelligence in radiation therapy: from imaging to delivery—a comprehensive review. BJR Artif. Intell. 2, ubaf012 (2025).PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health, Foundational Research Gaps and Future Directions for Digital Twins (National Academy of Sciences, 2024).Zhang, N. Digital Twins and Intelligence: A Symbiotic Framework. PhD thesis, Univ. Birmingham (2023).Gu, Z., Liu, F., Chen, J., Yin, C. & Zhang, P. A proactive agent collaborative framework for zero-shot multimodal medical reasoning. Adv. Intell. Syst. 7, 2400840 (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Srinivasu, P. N., Aruna Kumari, G. L., Ahmed, S. & Alhumam, A. Exploring agentic AI in healthcare: a study on its working mechanism. Front. Med. 12, 1753443 (2025).Article Google Scholar Wang, Q. et al. A feasibility study of automating radiotherapy planning with large language model agents. Phys. Med. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adbff1 (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Hassoon, A. et al. Randomized trial of two artificial intelligence coaching interventions to increase physical activity in cancer survivors. NPJ Digit. Med. 4, 168 (2021).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Chaudhuri, A. et al. Predictive digital twin for optimizing patient-specific radiotherapy regimens under uncertainty in high-grade gliomas. Front. Artif. Intell. 6, 1222612 (2023).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Giansanti, D. & Morelli, S. Exploring the potential of digital twins in cancer treatment: a narrative review of reviews. J. Clin. Med. 14, 3574 (2025).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Chang, C. W. et al. Exploration of an adaptive proton therapy strategy using CBCT with the concept of digital twins. Phys. Med. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ada684 (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Katsoulakis, E. et al. Digital twins for health: a scoping review. NPJ Digit. Med. 7, 77 (2024).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Laubenbacher, R., Mehrad, B., Shmulevich, I. & Trayanova, N. Digital twins in medicine. Nat. Comput. Sci. 4, 184–191 (2024).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Mackay, K., Bernstein, D., Glocker, B., Kamnitsas, K. & Taylor, A. A review of the metrics used to assess auto-contouring systems in radiotherapy. Clin. Oncol. 35, 354–369 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.016 (2023).Article CAS Google Scholar Han, Z. et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted delineation for postoperative radiotherapy in patients with lung cancer: a prospective, multi-center, cohort study. Front. Oncol. 14, 1388297 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1388297 (2024).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Rasmussen, M. E. et al. Potential of E-learning interventions and artificial intelligence-assisted contouring skills in radiotherapy: the ELAISA study. JCO Glob. Oncol. 10, e2400173 https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.24.00173 (2024).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Rhee, D. J. et al. Automated radiation treatment planning for cervical cancer. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 30, 340–347 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2020.05.006 (2020).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Asher, G. L. et al. Dosimetric evaluations using cycle-consistent generative adversarial network synthetic CT for MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy. Front. Oncol. 15, 1672778 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1672778 (2025).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Truhn, D., Eckardt, J. N., Ferber, D. & Kather, J. N. Large language models and multimodal foundation models for precision oncology. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 8, 72 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-024-00573-2 (2024).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Jensen, J. & Deng, J. Digital twins for radiation oncology. In Companion Proc. of the ACM Web Conf. 2023, 989–993 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2023).Mastroleo, F. et al. Translational barriers to digital twins in radiation oncology. Phys. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 40, 101024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2026.101024 (2026).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Thangaraj, P. M., Benson, S. H., Oikonomou, E. K., Asselbergs, F. W. & Khera, R. Cardiovascular care with digital twin technology in the era of generative artificial intelligence. Eur. Heart J. 45, 4808–4821 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae619 (2024).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Rahmim, A. et al. Theranostic digital twins for personalized radiopharmaceutical therapies: reimagining theranostics via computational nuclear oncology. Front. Oncol. 12, 1062592 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1062592 (2022).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Strigari, L. et al. Computational nuclear oncology toward precision radiopharmaceutical therapies: ethical, regulatory, and socioeconomic dimensions of theranostic digital twins. J. Nucl. Med. 66, 748–756 https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268186 (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar McNaughton, J. et al. Machine learning for medical image translation: a systematic review. Bioengineering https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091078 (2023).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Boulanger, M. et al. Deep learning methods to generate synthetic CT from MRI in radiotherapy: a literature review. Phys. Med. 89, 265–281 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.07.027 (2021).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Xiao, F. et al. Deep learning-based synthetic-CT-free photon dose calculation in MR-guided radiotherapy: a proof-of-concept study. Med. Phys. 52, e70106 https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.70106 (2025).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Bahloul, M. A. et al. Advancements in synthetic CT generation from MRI: a review of techniques, and trends in radiation therapy planning. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 25, e14499 (2024).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar O’Connor, L. M. et al. Comparison of synthetic computed tomography generation methods, incorporating male and female anatomical differences, for magnetic resonance imaging-only definitive pelvic radiotherapy. Front. Oncol. 12, 822687 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.822687 (2022).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Emami, H., Dong, M., Nejad-Davarani, S. P. & Glide-Hurst, C. K. Generating synthetic CTs from magnetic resonance images using generative adversarial networks. Med. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13047 (2018).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Han, X. MR-based synthetic CT generation using a deep convolutional neural network method. Med. Phys. 44, 1408–1419 https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12155 (2017).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Koul, A., Duran, D. & Hernandez-Boussard, T. Synthetic data, synthetic trust: navigating data challenges in the digital revolution. Lancet Digit. Health 7, 100924 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landig.2025.100924 (2025).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Meyer, C. et al. Artificial intelligence contouring in radiotherapy for organs-at-risk and lymph node areas. Radiat. Oncol. 19, 168 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02554-y (2024).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Darby, P. et al. Inter-observer variability in radiotherapy contouring with the use of autocontouring software: a systematic review. Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncol. 58, 101144 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2026.101144 (2026).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Lucido, J. J. et al. Validation of clinical acceptability of deep-learning-based automated segmentation of organs-at-risk for head-and-neck radiotherapy treatment planning. Front. Oncol. 13, 1137803 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1137803 (2023).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Doolan, P. J. et al. A clinical evaluation of the performance of five commercial artificial intelligence contouring systems for radiotherapy. Front. Oncol. 13, 1213068 (2023).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Bitterman, D. S. et al. A randomized controlled crossover trial to evaluate the efficacy of AI-assisted heart contouring. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Physics 120, S41 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.061 (2024).Article Google Scholar Appenzoller, L. M., Michalski, J. M., Thorstad, W. L., Mutic, S. & Moore, K. L. Predicting dose–volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning. Med. Phys. 39, 7446–7461 (2012).Article PubMed Google Scholar Chung, C. V. et al. Knowledge-based planning for fully automated radiation therapy treatment planning of 10 different cancer sites. Radiother. Oncol. 202, 110609 (2025).Article PubMed Google Scholar Shen, C., Chen, L. & Jia, X. A hierarchical deep reinforcement learning framework for intelligent automatic treatment planning of prostate cancer intensity modulated radiation therapy. Phys. Med. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac09a2 (2021).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Yang, D. et al. Automated treatment planning with deep reinforcement learning for head-and-neck (HN) cancer intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Phys. Med. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad965d (2024).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Giraud, P. & Bibault, J. E. Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy: current applications and future trends. Diagn. Interv. Imaging 105, 475–480 (2024).Article PubMed Google Scholar Portik, D. et al. Knowledge-based versus deep learning based treatment planning for breast radiotherapy. Phys. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 29, 100539 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2024.100539 (2024).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Parikh, P. J. et al. A multi-institutional phase 2 trial of ablative 5-fraction stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided on-table adaptive radiation therapy for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 117, 799–808 (2023).Article PubMed Google Scholar Leeman, J. E. et al. Magnetic resonance-guided prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy with daily online plan adaptation: results of a prospective phase 1 trial and supplemental cohort. Adv. Radiat. Oncol. 7, 100934 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.100934 (2022).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Yoganathan, S. A., Maria Das, K. J., Agarwal, A. & Kumar, S. Magnitude, impact, and management of respiration-induced target motion in radiotherapy treatment: a comprehensive review. J. Med. Phys. 42, 101–115 https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_22_17 (2017).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Yuan, X. et al. Machine learning in image-based outcome prediction after radiotherapy: a review. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 26, e14559 https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14559 (2025).Article PubMed Google Scholar Mastroleo, F. et al. Large language models for toxicity extraction in oncology trials: a real-world benchmark in prostate radiotherapy. Radiother. Oncol. 216, 111348 (2026).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Dudas, D., Dilling, T. J., Jim, H. & Naqa, I. E. Effective use of PROs for survival prediction: Transformer-based modelling in NSCLC patients. Radiother. Oncol. 218, 111441 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2026.111441 (2026).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Reuter, L. M. et al. Prediction of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients: a radiomics and dosiomics machine learning approach using the prospective multicenter RTOG 0617 and REQUITE trials. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 125, 1149–1159 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2026.01.031 (2026).Article PubMed Google Scholar Men, K. et al. A deep learning model for predicting xerostomia due to radiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the RTOG 0522 clinical trial. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 105, 440–447 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.009 (2019).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Dehelean, D. C. et al. Evaluating large language models as an educational tool for meningioma patients: patient and clinician perspectives. Radiat. Oncol. 20, 101 (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Olson, K. D. et al. Use of ambient AI scribes to reduce administrative burden and professional burnout. JAMA Netw. Open 8, e2534976 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.34976 (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Duggan, M. J. et al. Clinician experiences with ambient scribe technology to assist with documentation burden and efficiency. JAMA Netw. Open. 8, e2460637 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60637 (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Shah, S. J. et al. Physician perspectives on ambient AI scribes. JAMA Netw. Open. 8, e251904 (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Lee, P., Bubeck, S. & Petro, J. Benefits, limits, and risks of GPT-4 as an AI chatbot for medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 388, 1233–1239 (2023).Article PubMed Google Scholar Vitriol, J. A., O’Shea, B. A. & Calanchini, J. Less biased yet more defensive: the impact of control processes. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 30, 108–119 (2024).Article PubMed Google Scholar Claessens, M. et al. Quality assurance for AI-based applications in radiation therapy. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 32, 421–431 (2022).Article PubMed Google Scholar Huang, Y. et al. Deep learning for patient-specific quality assurance: predicting gamma passing rates for IMRT based on delivery fluence informed by log files. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 21, 15330338221104881 https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338221104881 (2022).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Miao, J., Xu, Y., Men, K. & Dai, J. A feasibility study of deep learning prediction model for VMAT patient-specific QA. Front. Oncol. 15, 1509449 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1509449 (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Nyflot, M. J., Thammasorn, P., Wootton, L. S., Ford, E. C. & Chaovalitwongse, W. A. Deep learning for patient-specific quality assurance: identifying errors in radiotherapy delivery by radiomic analysis of gamma images with convolutional neural networks. Med. Phys. 46, 456–464 https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13338 (2019).Article PubMed Google Scholar Luk, S. M. H., Ford, E. C., Phillips, M. H. & Kalet, A. M. Improving the quality of care in radiation oncology using artificial intelligence. Clin. Oncol. 34, 89–98 (2022).Article CAS Google Scholar Ono, T. et al. Applications of artificial intelligence for machine- and patient-specific quality assurance in radiation therapy: current status and future directions. J. Radiat. Res. 65, 421–432 (2024).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar El Naqa, I. A Guide To Outcome Modeling in Radiotherapy and Oncology: Listening to the Data (CRC Press, 2018).Cui, S. et al. Artificial intelligence for outcome modeling in radiotherapy. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 32, 351–364 (2022).Article PubMed Google Scholar Wang, S., Wang, K. & Lin, J. Predictive value of machine learning for radiation pneumonitis and checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 15, 20961 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05505-z (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Cui, S., Ten Haken, R. K. & El Naqa, I. Integrating multiomics information in deep learning architectures for joint actuarial outcome prediction in non-small cell lung cancer patients after radiation therapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 110, 893–904 (2021).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar El Naqa, I. et al. Translation of AI into oncology clinical practice. Oncogene 42, 3089–3097 (2023).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Kelly, C. J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., Corrado, G. & King, D. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Med. 17, 195 (2019).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Allen, L. N. et al. Artificial intelligence in primary care: frameworks, challenges, and guardrails. Lancet Prim. Care 2, 100079 (2025).Article Google Scholar Wang, F. & Beecy, A. Implementing AI models in clinical workflows: a roadmap. BMJ Evid. Based Med. 30, 285–287 (2025).PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar El Naqa, I., Moran, J. & Ten Haken, R. in The Modern Technology of Radiation Oncology. A Compendium for Medical Physicists and Radiation Oncologists vol. 4 (ed. Van Dyk, J.) 301–320 (Medical Physics Pub, 2020).Hurkmans, C. et al. A joint ESTRO and AAPM guideline for development, clinical validation and reporting of artificial intelligence models in radiation therapy. Radiother. Oncol. 197, 110345 (2024).Article PubMed Google Scholar Pillai, M. et al. Using artificial intelligence to improve the quality and safety of radiation therapy. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 16, 1267–1272 (2019).Article PubMed Google Scholar Vandewinckele, L. et al. Overview of artificial intelligence-based applications in radiotherapy: recommendations for implementation and quality assurance. Radiother. Oncol. 153, 55–66 (2020).Article PubMed Google Scholar Food and Drug Administration. Artificial Intelligence & Medical Products: How CBER, CDER, CDRH, and OCP are Working Together (US FDA, 2024).Xu, J., Zhou, L., Chen, P., Qiu, W. & Liu, M. Whole lifecycle evolution control method of modular product structure oriented to personalized service. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 34, 1108–1124 https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2021.1963480 (2021).Article Google Scholar European Union. The EU Artificial Intelligence Act (EU, 2024).El Kababji, S. et al. Augmenting insufficiently accruing oncology clinical trials using generative models: validation study. J. Med. Internet Res. 27, e66821 (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Sumini, M., Teodori, F. & Isolan, L. Digital twins in dosimetry and radiotherapy, a survey and some applications. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 218, 111649 (2024).Article CAS Google Scholar Chang, C. W. et al. A digital twin framework for adaptive treatment planning in radiotherapy. Phys. Med. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae835a (2026).Article PubMed Google Scholar Olawade, D. B. et al. Digital twin applications in radiology and radiotherapy: applications, challenges, and future perspectives. Eur. J. Radiol. 200, 112865 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.112865 (2026).Article PubMed Google Scholar Elhaminia, B. et al. Deep learning combining imaging, dose and clinical data for predicting bowel toxicity after pelvic radiotherapy. Phys. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 33, 100710 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2025.100710 (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Jing, B. et al. Multimodal prediction for radiotherapy-induced hematologic toxicity in rectal cancer patients. NPJ Precis. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01476-0 (2026).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Fuhrman, J. D. et al. A review of explainable and interpretable AI with applications in COVID-19 imaging. Med. Phys. 49, 1–14 https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15359 (2022).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Drabiak, K., Kyzer, S., Nemov, V. & El Naqa, I. AI and machine learning ethics, law, diversity, and global impact. Br. J. Radiol. 96, 20220934 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220934 (2023).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Luo, Y. et al. A human-in-the-loop based Bayesian network approach to improve imbalanced radiation outcomes prediction for hepatocellular cancer patients with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Front. Oncol. 12, 1061024 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1061024 (2022).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Gooding, M. J., Boukerroui, D., Vasquez Osorio, E., Monshouwer, R. & Brunenberg, E. Multicenter comparison of measures for quantitative evaluation of contouring in radiotherapy. Phys. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 24, 152–158 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.11.009 (2022).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Mayo, C. S. et al. Operational ontology for oncology (O3): a professional society-based, multistakeholder, consensus-driven informatics standard supporting clinical and research use of real-world data from patients treated for cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 117, 533–550 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.033 (2023).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Zhang, J., Lei, Y., Xia, J., Chao, M. & Liu, T. Federated learning for enhanced dose–volume parameter prediction with decentralized data. Med. Phys. 52, 1408–1415 https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17566 (2025).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Shah, K. D. et al. Linear federated learning for outcome prediction with application to hepatocellular carcinoma radiotherapy. JCO Clin. Cancer Inf. 9, e2500074 https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-25-00074 (2025).Article Google Scholar Jochems, A. et al. Developing and validating a survival prediction model for NSCLC patients through distributed learning across 3 countries. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 99, 344–352 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.04.021 (2017).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Bibault, J. E. & Giraud, P. Deep learning for automated segmentation in radiotherapy: a narrative review. Br. J. Radiol. 97, 13–20 https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqad018 (2024).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Rattay, T. et al. External validation of a predictive model for acute skin radiation toxicity in the REQUITE breast cohort. Front. Oncol. 10, 575909 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.575909 (2020).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Buchner, J. A. et al. Development and external validation of an MRI-based neural network for brain metastasis segmentation in the AURORA multicenter study. Radiother. Oncol. 178, 109425 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2022.11.014 (2023).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Marketing submission recommendations for a predetermined change control plan for artificial intelligence-enabled device software functions. FDA https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/marketing-submission-recommendations-predetermined-change-control-plan-artificial-intelligence (2025).Good machine learning practice for medical device development: guiding principles. FDA https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/good-machine-learning-practice-medical-device-development-guiding-principles (2025).Stetson, P. D. et al. Responsible artificial intelligence governance in oncology. NPJ Digit. Med. 8, 407 (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Kang, J. et al. National cancer institute workshop on artificial intelligence in radiation oncology: training the next generation. Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 11, 74–83 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2020.06.001 (2021).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Kwon, Y. S. et al. Artificial intelligence-empowered radiation oncology residency education. Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 13, 8–10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2022.09.003 (2023).Article PubMed Google Scholar Decoster, R. et al. Towards an accessible, centralised, searchable database for AI courses in Europe: the artificial intelligence in medical imaging and radiation oncology education (AIMIROE) project. Eur. Radiol. Exp. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-026-00745-8 (2026).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Lerner, M. et al. Clinical validation of a commercially available deep learning software for synthetic CT generation for brain. Radiat. Oncol. 16, 66 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01794-6 (2021).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Yamauchi, R. et al. Clinical evaluation of deep learning and atlas-based auto-segmentation for organs at risk delineation. Med. Dosim. 49, 167–176 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2023.11.002 (2024).Article PubMed Google Scholar Maduro Bustos, L. A. et al. Feasibility evaluation of novel AI-based deep-learning contouring algorithm for radiotherapy. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 24, e14090 https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14090 (2023).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Byrne, M. et al. Varian ethos online adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: early results of contouring accuracy, treatment plan quality, and treatment time. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 23, e13479 https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13479 (2022).Article PubMed Google Scholar Fusco, R. et al. Quantitative imaging decision support (QIDS(TM)) tool consistency evaluation and radiomic analysis by means of 594 metrics in lung carcinoma on chest CT scan. Cancer Control 28, 1073274820985786 https://doi.org/10.1177/1073274820985786 (2021).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Ryczkowski, A., Jodda, A. & Piotrowski, T. Linking RayStation AI auto-contouring with eclipse TPS: a scripted workflow for clinical integration. Rep. Pract. Oncol. Radiother. 30, 749–757 https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.109182 (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Caissie, A. et al. Head and neck radiation therapy patterns of practice variability identified as a challenge to real-world big data: results from the learning from analysis of multicentre big data aggregation (LAMBDA) consortium. Adv. Radiat. Oncol. 8, 100925 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.100925 (2023).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Yahya, N. et al. Independent external validation of predictive models for urinary dysfunction following external beam radiotherapy of the prostate: issues in model development and reporting. Radiother. Oncol. 120, 339–345 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.010 (2016).Article PubMed Google Scholar Pang, E. P. P. et al. Multicentre evaluation of deep learning CT autosegmentation of the head and neck region for radiotherapy. npj Digit. Med. 8, 312 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01624-z (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Rusanov, B. et al. Guidance on selecting and evaluating AI auto-segmentation systems in clinical radiotherapy: insights from a six-vendor analysis. Phys. Engineer. Sci. Med. 48, 301–316 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01513-x (2025).Article Google Scholar Vaassen, F. et al. Evaluation of measures for assessing time-saving of automatic organ-at-risk segmentation in radiotherapy. Phys. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 13, 1–6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2019.12.001 (2020).Article PubMed Google Scholar Cross, J. L., Choma, M. A. & Onofrey, J. A. Bias in medical AI: implications for clinical decision-making. PLoS Digit. Health 3, e0000651 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000651 (2024).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar McQuinlan, Y. et al. An investigation into the risk of population bias in deep learning autocontouring. Radiother. Oncol. 186, 109747 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109747 (2023).Article PubMed Google Scholar Weissman, G. E. Evaluation and regulation of artificial intelligence medical devices for clinical decision support. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 8, 81–99 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-103123-095824 (2025).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Guberina, N. et al. Do AI-based contouring algorithms influence physicians in the online adaptive radiotherapy of patients with bladder cancer? Tech. Innov. Patient Support Radiat. Oncol. 38, 100401 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2026.100401 (2026).Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Nealon, K. A. et al. Using failure mode and effects analysis to evaluate risk in the clinical adoption of automated contouring and treatment planning tools. Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 12, e344–e353 (2022).Article PubMed Google Scholar