Skip to navigationSkip to main contentSkip to right columnADVERTISEMENTBy Jan WolfeTue, June 23, 2026 at 5:50 PM GMT+2 4 min readBy Jan WolfeWASHINGTON, June 23 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court further limited the reach of a federal law used to hold corporations liable for human rights abuses committed abroad, as it issued a ruling on Tuesday ending a lawsuit by members of the Falun Gong movement accusing Cisco Systems of facilitating religious persecution in China.The justices, in a 6-3 ruling, reversed a lower court's decision that had breathed new life into the 2011 lawsuit, which was brought under the Alien Tort Statute of 1789. The suit had alleged that Cisco knowingly developed technology that allowed China's government to surveil and persecute Falun Gong members.The Alien Tort Statute had been dormant for nearly two centuries before lawyers began using it in the 1980s to bring international human rights cases in U.S. courts. The Cisco case posed the question of whether the law creates liability for corporations that "aid and abet" human rights abuses, a form of what is called accomplice liability.Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who authored the decision, said that a lower court erred in finding that aiding-and-abetting liability exists under the Alien Tort Statute, or ATS, for Cisco's disputed conduct."Courts cannot create new rights of action to remedy violations of international law, so there is necessarily no liability for aiding and abetting such violations," Barrett wrote. "Plaintiffs' ATS claims against Cisco must be dismissed."The court's six conservative justices were in the majority on the ATS issue, while its three liberal justices dissented from the ruling.The court on Tuesday also decided 8-1 that a related statute, known as the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991, did not permit a set of plaintiffs to move forward with a lawsuit seeking to hold two Cisco executives liable of aiding and abetting torture. Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented from that part of the ruling.The plaintiffs accused San Jose, California-based Cisco of knowingly designing and implementing the "Golden Shield," an internet surveillance system used by the Chinese Communist Party to target dissidents. The plaintiffs said China used the system to track and then torture Falun Gong members.Cisco called the allegations unfounded and offensive.President Donald Trump's administration sided with Cisco in the case.The Human Rights Law Foundation, a nonprofit organization in Washington, sued Cisco on behalf of a group of Falun Gong members. A judge dismissed the lawsuit in 2014, saying the alleged conduct was not sufficiently connected to the United States for the case to proceed.Terms and Privacy PolicyEU DSA contactPrivacy & Cookie SettingsMore Info