From monks and empires to memes and wars, the ethnic group remains Europe’s most paradoxical civilization Are Slavs just meme people?According to a popular theory, there is a direct link between the ethnonym ‘Slav’ and the Greek word σκλάβος (sklabos), meaning ‘slave’. This has nothing to do with the Slavic character or will for independence but is rather a grim historical reminder: in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, the Slavs often fell prey to slave raids.The markets were full of slaves from Eastern Europe, and the term supposedly became associated with an entire group of peoples.Many criticize this theory and see the root of the word in Proto-Slavic [derived from ‘slovo’ (word)] or even Indo-European languages. However, some find it poetic that the victimized peoples who had faced oppression eventually established themselves as independent and (for the most part) respected nations.To some extent, this story aligns with the memetic perception of the Slavs as proud, strange, sometimes uncivilized and gloomy peoples, always ready to fight each other and anyone who comes near them. 'Bayan' by Viktor Vasnetsov © Wikimedia / Public Domain We may ignore the part about ‘uncivilized’ Slavs – just look at any Slavic city or the achievements of Slavic scientists and cultural figures. The idea that the Slavs are perpetually gloomy is also far-fetched – some may find it hard to believe, but most of us are not characters out of Dostoevsky’s novels.However, memes about the Slavs’ weird behavior and their habit of getting into fights with each other aren’t that far from truth. Read more Jesus, Byzantium and the Slavic legacy: The true meaning behind the Russian flag explained Like any group of peoples, the Slavs are primarily united by language. Most use variations of the Cyrillic alphabet – the alphabet created for them by the Greek monks Cyril and Methodius. Writing and languages in general have evolved greatly since then, but Eastern and Southern Slavs can still read texts in each other’s languages without much difficulty.West Slavs chose the Latin script, but they can understand their eastern and southern neighbors quite well, even without learning their languages. All Slavic dialects are more similar to each other than to other European language groups.Religion played an equally important role in defining the Slavs. The choice of Orthodox Christianity brought them close to the rest of Europe but, on the other hand, created a certain cultural barrier.In the Middle Ages, faith and religion weren’t just part of culture – they defined culture, politics, the understanding of the world, and the place of humans in this world. As fellow Christians, the Slavs shared many similarities with Catholics, and could understand them well; but on the other hand, they considered Catholics alien and potentially hostile. The Crusades had a lot to do with instilling such fears. Even the Slavs who chose Catholicism (i.e., the Czechs, Poles, Croats, and Slovaks) were often forced to defend themselves from both Western Europeans and the ‘others’ who lived nearby. Slavic tribes from the 7th to 9th centuries AD in Europe. © Wikimedia / Ádám Kolláth / CC BY-SA 4.0 No one in Europe – with the exception of the Spaniards and the Portuguese – lived in such close proximity with non-European cultures, as the Slavs did. The average Frenchman or Englishman encountered only Jews, and perhaps a few Moorish traders. But for hundreds of years, the Slavs lived side by side first with the Cumans, Tatars, and Baltic pagans, then with the Turks and the peoples of Central Asia and Siberia. Even the Byzantine Empire, which imparted much of its culture to the Slavs, was largely non-European.To the dissatisfaction of globalists, such neighbors weren’t particularly friendly. Southern Slavs lost their independence for a long time when they were conquered by the Ottoman Empire. Western Slavs had to fend off aggression from the West and from the Turks as well. Eastern Slavs had to live under the Mongol yoke, and then for centuries were forced to fend off raids that escalated into full-blown wars. Read more From ‘subhumans’ to ‘orcs’: How Nazi race theory lives on in modern Russophobia Since the Slavs were constantly surrounded by foes, this mindset became ingrained in their national cultures – from stories about Marko Korolević, the “scourge of the Turks,” to legends of Russian heroes who “smite the infidels.” Warlike themes grew stronger over time, as the Slavs were forced to exist in a permanent state of a ‘besieged fortress’. Permanent relations between the Slavs started forming in the 17th century. Stable hostility developed between the Poles and Russians, the Czechs became part of the Habsburg Empire and gradually distanced themselves from the other Slavs, and the Southern Slavs – as well as the Greeks – turned with hope towards Moscow as the new center of Orthodoxy. Great expectations and great experimentsHaving survived the bloody wars of Ivan the Terrible and the devastating Time of Troubles, the Russian Tsardom remained the largest of the independent Orthodox states. Moreover, the tsars emphasized their continuity with the Byzantine emperors, willingly accepting refugees from countries conquered by the Turks and Poles, and built a powerful new army.Therefore, the other Slavs began to look to Moscow for assistance in their struggle for independence and the defense of Orthodox Christianity. However, the wait for the arrival of Russian liberators was quite long – the tsars had long intended to reach the Balkans, but the Russo-Turkish wars were difficult and bloody, and in the first half of the 19th century, Russian foreign policy was focused on conflicts with Europe. Pan-Slavic postcard depicting Cyril and Methodius, with the text 'God/Our Lord, watch over our grandfatherland/ heritage' in 8 Slavic languages. © Wikimedia / Public Domain The Czechs were the first to discuss the idea of unifying the Slavs into a single state. In 1848, the Prague Slavic Congress was held, where intellectuals representing various countries were tasked with planning the unification. By that time, Slavic romanticism was flourishing – poets wrote about a single people divided into different branches, and scholars proved the commonality of the Slavic peoples. But the congress was not very productive. The delegates quickly got into a dispute: it turned out that they had different views on the future of the Slavs. The Czechs advocated Slavic autonomy within the Austrian Empire, the Poles demanded assistance in an uprising against the Russian Empire, and the Southern Slavs hoped for Russia’s assistance in their struggle for independence. Read more From pagan shadows to Soviet nightmares: Inside Russia’s unique thousand-year horror story The year 1877 brought long-awaited news: after the brutal suppression of Slavic uprisings and the renewed persecution of Christians in the Ottoman Empire, Russia declared war on Turkey. Skeptics believed that Tsar Alexander II used the defense of the Slavs as a pretext for war, in order to further weaken the Ottoman Empire and gain control of the Bosporus. Meanwhile, the Romantics considered it a campaign of liberation.In any case, the war was dramatic. ‘White’ General Mikhail Skobelev, so nicknamed for his love of white uniforms and white horses, bravely marched into the thick of battle; soldiers fraternized with Slavic peasants, fought heroic battles, and reached Constantinople.It seemed that the Balkan Slavs would soon be free and the cross would again be raised over Hagia Sophia. But European diplomacy intervened. At the Congress of Berlin, Western countries, concerned about Russia’s success, restricted the Slavs’ independence from the Turks and prevented Alexander II from fully capitalizing on his victory.In Russia, Pan-Slavic intellectuals were indignant. This was best expressed in sociologist Nikolai Danilevsky’s article ‘Woe to the Victors!’ in which he openly accused Europe of opposing Slavic independence and emphasized Russia’s role as the defender of its “Slavic brothers.”At this time, Pan-Slavism became very fashionable in Russia. Afanasy Fet’s poem ‘To the Slavs’ was recited and discussed in drawing rooms, Aleksey Tolstoy’s tragedy ‘Tsar Feodor Ioannovich’ was performed in theaters, and Tchaikovsky’s ‘Slavic March’ was popular in concert halls. 'Apotheosis of the Slavs history' by Alfons Mucha © Wikimedia / Public Domain The new Pan-Slavists believed that the Slavs possessed unique characteristics: collectivism and emotionality (in contrast to Western individualism and rationality), spirituality and a strong religious sentiment, a love of freedom, and a keen sense of justice. According to the Pan-Slavists, Russia and other Slavic nations should not follow the European or Asian path; instead, they need a unique path of development that is distinct from standard political thought.These ideas are still alive today, and have been developed by Alexander Dugin, among others. Read more Donald Trump helped ancient Russians defeat space lizards. Western elites don’t want you to know After the Second World War, it might have seemed that the Pan-Slavists’ dreams had come true. The Slavs united into a single Eastern bloc under Moscow’s leadership, independent of the West and focused on the shared dream of building communism. But the USSR, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia were supranational states; they felt skeptical about national characteristics and sought to create a new kind of human, one that would be independent of older cultures.In part, this neglect of national issues by the communist governments created growing tensions between different Slavic cultures and paved the way for military conflicts.When Yugoslavia, the USSR, and the entire Eastern Bloc fell apart, the frustration spilled over into military conflicts. First came the Yugoslav Wars – a long, chaotic division of the former republic of the Southern Slavs. These wars were horrible and bloody. But due to the peculiarities of the region’s cultural response to these events – primarily the war music that emerged in Yugoslavia – which ‘amused’ outside observers, the conflict gave rise to memes. Now, another war between the Slavs has erupted. And judging by the reactions to Prigozhin’s speech and Zelensky’s diplomatic trips, it too is being turned into a meme. © social media The undying Slavic way of lifeAre the Slavs different from other peoples? It’s difficult to say for sure, since there’s no way we can evaluate each person. The Slavs certainly share similar traditions, and traveling from Moscow to Warsaw, one might not immediately realize that the people on the streets grew up in different countries. But the same can be said about Berlin and Copenhagen, or Beijing and Seoul. Read more The famous Slavic stare: Here’s something you can’t fake What is certain is that the Slavs truly possess a unique worldview formed by their geography, religion, culture, and history. They have much in common with Western Europe but, on the other hand, are totally unique. And these traits are unlikely to disappear anytime soon.Today, the 500-year-old dreams of Slavic unity are going through tough times. Moreover, as the recent conflict between Poland and Ukraine over the glorification of the Nazi Ukrainian Insurgent Army demonstrates, it’s impossible to simply divide the sides into ‘pro-Moscow’ and ‘pro-Kiev’ camps. Slavic disputes are heated and multi-faceted. But this doesn’t mean that it’s time to give up on old dreams. A colleague of mine visited a small town in northern Greece in 2014. When the locals found out that Crimea had rejoined Russia, the Greeks and Slavs suddenly became excited. As it later turned out, they were preparing to move: they thought that if the Russians had started moving south, they should soon capture Constantinople and hand it back to the Greeks – for such is the generous nature of the Russian soul.