I'm Tom Klootwijk, author of TK-SROF-2.0 and TOM-GROK. I'm inviting expert review of a concrete idea: make an operator's description part of a machine's typed state, so an admitted event can both act and change the operator used by future events. x[n+1] = Act(x[n], d[n], e[n]) d[n+1] = Rewrite(x[n], d[n], e[n]) The action reads the committed old description. A validated rewrite is committed with the successor state and becomes effective on the next event. This gives a precise answer to which rule produced each result, even after the rules evolve. That boundary, and replay of the complete operator history, are central to the formalization. One worked profile is the double-Hadamard/OTAN2 pinion. A field phi supplies local gradients and direction; phase-dependent gains feed two componentwise products, yielding q for action selection. OTAN2 and declared Klein seam transport advance the state. Mirrored pinions are coherent views of one action and one rewrite. The 29-page formalization spells out typing, admission, transport, and conditional replay and refinement arguments. The released TK-EDGE-1 runtime includes finite integer pinion and U-TAPE-1 interpreters on CPU, CUDA, and WebGPU, with checkpoints, replay, and GPU paging. The related TOMK release evaluates 121 explicit symbolic hypotheses over 16 supplied datasets. My commercial thesis is that this architecture can enable large revenues as an auditable foundation for adaptive industrial software. The accompanying compendia map 56 mathematical domain profiles and 12 future-technology use cases, including robot digital twins, event-vision industrial inspection, FPGA reconfiguration, and edge sensor pipelines. I'm looking for researchers and builders in formal methods, GPU computing, and control systems to review the specification and identify the first high-value pilot. TOM-GROK (formalization, code, compendia): https://huggingface.co/c0mbatduckzz/TOM-GROK TOMK (symbolic learner): https://huggingface.co/c0mbatduckzz/TOMK If you'd rather listen, the NotebookLM audio overviews are here to enjoy: https://notebook.google.com/notebook/08548281-524e-4e95-8c0a-7e6ebb6b3d46 Which part of the formalization would you challenge first, and which pilot has the clearest path to paid adoption?   submitted by   /u/c0mbatduckzz [link]   [comments]