I'm Aviel, the developer of AdProtektor. It's a live product for businesses and agencies running ads to websites. We're still looking for our first paying customer. The problem I'm working on: a campaign reports clicks, but the business sees few useful enquiries or orders. That doesn't automatically mean click fraud. It could be the tracking, the page, the traffic, or several things together. AdProtektor brings together visitor histories, suspicious-traffic evidence and available session recordings. It also has campaign diagnostic tools and a ConversionOS add-on for browser/server conversion measurement. Google and Meta protection actions depend on the connected account and chosen settings; you can start with website tracking alone. The distinction I want to keep clear is that a repeat visit isn't proof of fraud, a phone-button click isn't a completed call, and a reported conversion isn't necessarily a customer. For an initial evaluation, I'd pick one website and one question to answer. The trial is seven days without a card, but needs installation and real traffic. With a small sample, the honest result may be inconclusive. Product: https://adprotektor.app/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=organic_community&utm_campaign=first_customers_202610&utm_content=sideproject_intro If you manage a paid-traffic website, what would make this worth installing alongside the analytics you already use? What evidence would you need before trusting a suspicious-traffic flag?   submitted by   /u/Ijjimem [link]   [comments]