A woman is questioning whether she’s being unreasonable after apparently asking a friend to pay for damage to her car following a day-long borrowing arrangement. What started as a simple favor turned into a dispute after the friend allegedly admitted she had allowed her boyfriend to drive the vehicle despite being told not to let anyone else use it. The 30-year-old woman shared the situation in a Reddit post, claiming that her friend, whom she called Mia, had asked to borrow her car because her own vehicle was being repaired. Although she agreed, she apparently made several conditions clear. Mia was not supposed to use drive-thrus, leave the car in questionable parking lots, use valet services, or let anyone else drive it. According to the post, Mia initially rolled her eyes at the restrictions but agreed to follow them. The woman professed that her car wasn’t particularly expensive, but she had paid it off and couldn’t afford unexpected repair bills. Her story kept changing Everything seemingly appeared normal when Mia returned the vehicle that evening, until the owner reportedly noticed a fresh scrape along the passenger side and damage to the side mirror. When confronted, Mia allegedly blamed a “tight parking spot” and suggested another driver might have “parked too close.” However, her explanation reportedly changed several times as the owner asked where the damage could have happened. AITJ for refusing to cover my friend’s "small mistake" after I said no in advance byu/DaxonPierce inAmITheJerk She eventually asked Mia whether she had allowed someone else to drive the car. That’s when her friend allegedly admitted that “she let her boyfriend move it ‘just for a second’ because she was carrying bags.” The owner apparently reminded Mia that she had specifically prohibited anyone else from driving the vehicle. However, rather than accepting responsibility, Mia reportedly accused her of focusing on the wrong issue. The woman said she rejected Mia’s offer to buff out the damage herself and instead wanted a professional repair shop to assess it. She also expected her friend to cover the cost, arguing that the damage happened while the vehicle was in her care and that she had broken the agreement they made. Mia reportedly pushed back, saying the car was old and that minor scratches were bound to happen. She also suggested the owner should blame the person responsible for the parking incident rather than her. Things apparently became more uncomfortable when Mia told her, “If you cared this much you shouldn’t have let me borrow it.” The disagreement eventually spilled into their wider friendship circle. According to the user, Mia began telling mutual friends that she was “trying to make her go broke over a minor scratch.” One friend even suggested she should accept the “small mistake” rather than risk damaging the friendship. However, the user asserted that she wasn’t demanding an unreasonable amount of money. She simply wanted the damage assessed professionally and her friend to take responsibility for what happened. According to the American Automobile Association (AAA), auto insurance in the US generally follows the vehicle rather than the driver, meaning the owner’s policy typically covers someone borrowing the car with permission. However, it points out an important exception: the borrower cannot extend that permission to another person. For example, if someone borrows a car and then allows a friend to drive it, the owner’s insurance coverage may not apply.