Jerome Powell’s term as Fed Chairman expires this Friday, with Kevin Warsh now confirmed by the Senate as his successor. The transition has implications beyond a change in the Fed’s leadership. Further, Stephen Miran, who was appointed Fed Governor in September 2025 to fill the vacancy left by Adriana Kugler, is seeing his term come to an end.Most noteworthy during his term, he dissented at all six FOMC meetings he attended, consistently pushing for 50-basis-point rate cuts. It’s not a stretch to say he was the Fed’s biggest dove. In the graphic below, we circle Miran’s year-end Fed Funds projection in the latest Fed’s dot plot. As shown, Miran projected a year-end 2026 Fed Funds rate of 2.625%, nearly a full percentage point below the current median of 3.42%. That dovish voice is now gone.Warsh’s arrival shifts the balance. Here are a few considerations worth keeping in mind:The Fed tilted slightly more hawkishly: Warsh may prove more dovish than his reputation suggests, but it is nearly impossible he will match Miran’s appetite for cuts.The next FOMC meeting on June 17th is unlikely to produce action. Given recent inflation data, we see little appetite for rate cuts at the next FOMC meeting despite new leadership.Powell isn’t gone. He has pledged to remain a Fed Governor through January 2028, or until ongoing investigations into the Fed’s construction project and legal challenges against Governor Lisa Cook reach what he calls “transparency and finality.”The bottom line: The Fed just got incrementally more hawkish, and the June meeting will be the first test of what that actually means. Moreover, Kevin Warsh will now be on the speaking circuit, so we can better ascertain his thoughts on inflation, employment, and how he will lead the Fed going forward.Absolute And Relative Analysis Signal FragilityIt is no secret that technology stocks, and within the technology sector, semiconductor and hardware stocks, are grossly outperforming the market. The first graph below, shows how overbought technology (XLK) is, both in absolute and relative terms. Most often, such a wide divergence in technical scores between sectors signals that a rotation is likely. The question we should then ask is what might be in favor if technology is going to lose some momentum. This is where looking at both absolute and relative scores can be very helpful.The answer to our question of which sector(s) are next to outperform the market is likely among the many underperformers. Let’s turn our attention to the second graphic. Instead of sectors, it uses stock factors to assess how different types/styles of stocks are trading. The relative scores show that plenty of factors are decently or even grossly oversold relative to the market. But the absolute scores show that many of the relatively oversold sectors are overbought to varying degrees. For example, we highlight the large-cap value sector, which is decently overbought on an absolute basis despite being relatively oversold. Accordingly, a rotation could likely mean relative outperformance of value, low-beta, and generally more conservative stocks versus technology and high-beta stocks, but this could occur during a broad-based market decline, bringing absolute scores for many factors and sectors closer to fair value.It’s also worth noting that the dispersion of the dots in both graphics indicates poor breadth. While not a recipe for decline, it does point to fragile conditions. Taken together, the analysis raises concerns that the market will decline in the coming weeks, with technology stocks possibly leading the way lower and value stocks outperforming but still declining.Muni Junk Ignores The HeadlinesThe private credit markets are hitting turbulence, leaving some investors clamoring to reduce exposure to junk debt. On top of fear in the private credit markets, energy prices are high, consumer sentiment is poor, and interest rates are rising. However, the City of Houston had no problems selling a junk-rated municipal bond. Issued by the City of Houston and George Bush Intercontinental Airport, the BB+- rated debt offering is secured by rent payments from United Airlines.Considering that airlines are struggling due to high fuel costs, which is forcing them to raise ticket prices, and the recent bankruptcy of Spirit Airlines, this deal tells us a lot about where investor appetite stands for high-yield debt. Simply, the demand for higher-yielding securities is overriding headline risk.Tweet of the DayOriginal Post