There are lessons here that are also applicable to India. It needs to ensure access to every node in the supply chain, from energy and chips to data centres and models, while reducing dependence on any single providerThe uncertainty over Nvidia’s road ahead comes down to the company being so dependent on Huang’s singular vision and will.3 min readNov 12, 2026 06:10 AM IST First published on: Nov 12, 2026 at 06:10 AM ISTThe consequences of the relationship between Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and an executive at a Singapore-based company, who is alleged to be a Chinese spy, go far beyond the usual limits of an extramarital indiscretion. Huang’s supreme position within the chipmaker that is powering American domination in artificial intelligence has meant that he is more than just its larger-than-life mascot. Any impropriety on his part that could, as reports have suggested, lead to China gaining the upper hand in its geopolitical rivalry with the US carries consequences for his company — the announcement of an internal investigation led to hundreds of billions of dollars being wiped off the value of Nvidia — and also has national security implications. The episode has spotlighted the “key man risk”, a growing concern in the world’s biggest companies.The “key man risk” refers to the danger stemming from the fact that an entire company depends so heavily on one person that their actions or departure threaten the whole business. Other companies closely identified with charismatic CEO/founder figures, such as Meta (Mark Zuckerberg), Anthropic (Dario Amodei), OpenAI (Sam Altman) and Tesla and SpaceX (Elon Musk), can be said to run a similar risk. Not too long ago, Musk’s turbulent tenure as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency in the US government led to a steep decline in Tesla’s stock price, besides affecting the brand’s reputation. Hedging against such risks may require hastening the end of the “irreplaceable founder” myth and putting in place a succession plan. The uncertainty over Nvidia’s road ahead comes down to the company being so dependent on Huang’s singular vision and will.AdvertisementFor years, Huang, seen as having President Donald Trump’s ear, was one of the leading voices advocating for the sale of advanced chips to China in a bid to keep the latter hooked to American technology. In light of the recent revelations, especially with a Democratic Party-controlled Congress in place, there may well be fresh calls for greater regulation of technology and tighter export checks in Washington, the ramifications of which could be felt globally. There are lessons here, perhaps, that are also applicable to India’s AI strategy. It needs to ensure access to every node in the supply chain, from energy and chips to data centres and models, while reducing dependence on any single provider. ShareWhatsapptwitterFacebook