Manchester City still have information regarding their Premier League financial rules case that the public has not been made aware of yet.That is according to the club’s former chief operating officer, Chris Bird.City have information that has not yet been made public, says their former COOAFPHowever, football finance expert Stefan Borson believes it is wrong to give supporters hope that more details will emerge in the case.The Premier League announced on Tuesday that City have been found guilty of all charges against them.talkSPORT understands the club are set to appeal against the ruling, having been given until Friday to respond to the verdict.City were first charged back in February 2023 for 115 alleged breaches of Premier League financial rules between 2009 and 2023.City ‘innocent’, says former COOFollowing a damning Premier League statement, both Bird and Borson appeared in a heated clash on White and Jordan on Wednesday morning.The former, who was City COO between 1998 and 2003, claimed that ‘full process’ has not yet been completed.Bird told talkSPORT: “I think the words that are being used at the moment are one-sided and I think until both sides of the story are compared then I think we’ve got to be careful the way we describe things. There hasn’t been a full process yet.”In a statement of their own, City reiterated their stance that they are innocent.When asked if he agrees with the club’s statement, Bird added: “I agree. The club has got information that it is yet to put forward and is yet to be in the public eye.”‘Wrong’ to give City fans false hopeHowever, fellow City fan Borson believes it is wrong to give supporters false hope, as he said in response: “We know there was a 12-week hearing where they told us that they were presenting all of their evidence.Borson admits it is wrong to give City fans false hope that more details are to comeGetty“Frankly, it’s clearly obvious in the initial hearing you would put your best foot forward because your opportunity to overturn the initial hearing is always severely limited.“In fact, under the Premier League rules, they are not permitted to raise new evidence without permission of the Premier League or of the panel that sits. So it would be an incredibly risky thing to do.“So I don’t think we should be giving City fans in particular false hope in terms of what’s coming.“City clearly believe they’ve done nothing wrong. We accept that, but this is the independent commission panel coming with a very, very detailed set of reasons after a 12-week hearing.“We should not be silly about what they’ve done, City did put forward an incredibly expensive and high quality case and we can’t just dismiss what’s there in writing in front of us.”Meanwhile, Bird remained convinced there is more to come in the case ahead of a potential appeal by City.City have been given until Friday to respond to the verdict and are expected to appeal the rulingPAHe added: “I think there’s a story that will come out that will show that City are not the picture that the Premier League or the media are trying to paint.”The Premier League’s verdict follows an independent commission hearing on the case between September and December 2024.A sanctions hearing is now set to follow next, but City’s anticipated appeal will cause a delay to proceedings.The club have until Friday to respond to the verdict in the case.Once underway, the sanctions hearing is expected to last for several weeks.