The court held that no public interest much less larger public interest would require seeking of information of the educational qualification of the Prime Minister of India.The Gujarat High Court has ruled that Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s degree is personal information that cannot be disclosed under the Right to Information (RTI) Act and dismissed a plea filed by former Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal seeking details of the PM’s educational qualification.The September 29 ruling passed by Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice D N Ray held that just because personal information about the educational degree sought was that of the Prime Minister of the country, it does not mean that the said information would automatically fall “within the purview of ambit, or the public interest or larger public interest”, the exception to the exemptions under Section 8 (1)(e) and (j) of the Act”.Sections 8(1)(e) and 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 provide legal exemptions that allow public authorities to refuse the disclosure of information involving fiduciary relationships and personal privacy.“The fact that the information about the educational degree of the Prime Minister is already in the public domain, as noted by the CIC, has no relevance in so far as the consideration of obligations under the RTI Act,” the order added.The court said that the directions of the Information Commissioner requiring the PMO (Prime Minister’s Office) to provide specific number and year of the degree and PG degree to the Delhi University and Gujarat University office so as to facilitate the University to search and provide any documents relating to it, and further directing the Public Information Officer of the Delhi University and also the Gujarat University (the original petitioner) to search for the information regarding the degrees and provide them to the appellant herein, were “directly hit by Section 8(1)(e) and (j) of the RTI Act, 2005”.“None of the information directed to be disclosed can be said to be necessary for disclosure in public interest or larger public interest,” the court said.The bench went on to add, “Even a public servant being a citizen of the country cannot be compelled to disclose his personal information to the public merely because he is holding a public office or is a public servant, unless and until there is an obligation upon him to disclose or the public authority with whom the information is available is obliged to disclose under the RTI Act, 2005.”Story continues below this adOn September 28, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended the names of Justices Agarwal, Delhi High Court Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Telangana High Court Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh, for elevation to the apex court.Somya Panwar is a legal journalist at The Indian Express (Digital), where she covers the various High Courts across the country and the Supreme Court of India. Her writing is driven by a deep interest in how law influences society, particularly in areas of gender, feminism, and women’s rights. She is especially drawn to stories that examine questions of equality, autonomy, and social justice through the lens of the courts. Her work aims to make complex legal developments accessible, contextual, and relevant to everyday readers, with a focus on explaining what court decisions mean beyond legal jargon and how they shape public life. Alongside reporting, she manages the social media presence for Indian Express Legal, where she designs and curates posts using her understanding of digital trends, audience behaviour, and visual communication. Combining legal insight with strategic content design, she works on building engagement and expanding the desk’s digital reach. Somya holds a B.A. LL.B and a Master’s degree in Journalism. Before moving fully into media, she gained experience in litigation and briefly worked in corporate, giving her reporting a strong foundation. ... Read More Tags:Gujarat High CourtNarendra Modi