Social Adversity, Systemic Inflammation, and the Ticking of the Biological Aging Clocks in Men and Women

Wait 5 sec.

Objectives: We tested how multi-level socioeconomic disadvantage relates to biological aging and systemic inflammation in women and men from the population-based Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Methods: We examined cross-sectional data from 8,516 CLSA participants with baseline measures on systemic inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumoral necrosis factor-) and biological aging (metabolomic and six DNA methylation [DNAm] age estimates). Plasma samples underwent metabolomic profiling by Metabolon, Inc. Metabolomic age was estimated separately in males and females using sex-stratified models based on age-correlated metabolite levels. DNAm data generated using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC v1.0 array were used to estimate DNAm age across six established models, including Horvath, Hannum, PhenoAge, GrimAge, GrimAge2, and DunedinPACE. We used log-transformed metabolite levels to calculate metabolomic age by sex. We linked education, income, material and social deprivation to biomarkers of systemic inflammation and biological aging stratified by sex using generalized linear models. Multivariable models were adjusted by age, major behavioral risk factors, and chronic conditions. Results: Participants were aged on average of 62.6 years of age, and approximately 50% were females. In multivariable linear adjusted models, we found that in comparison to those earning [≥]$100K a year, women earning less