Former Bombay High Court judge Justice Gautam Patel and his family have been facing threats allegedly over his judgment in the Dawoodi Bohra succession case in 2024 (File photo).The Bombay Bar Association (BBA) Monday expressed grave concern over a series of targeted threats and violent attacks against retired Bombay High Court judge Justice Gautam S Patel and his family allegedly over his 2024 verdict in a dispute over the religious leadership of the Dawoodi Bohra community.The BBA, one of the oldest organisations of lawyers practising before the Bombay High Court, passed a resolution urging the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) to immediately raise the matter with British authorities to ensure the safety of Justice Patel’s family in England. The association warned that such acts “strike at the very heart of judicial independence”.The BBA resolution reads, “The Association records its strongest condemnation of any attempt to threaten, intimidate, harass, assault or otherwise target a Judge or members of a Judge’s family on account of the discharge of judicial functions. Reports that a member of Justice Patel’s family suffered physical injury in the course of one of these incidents render the matter particularly disturbing and warrant the most serious attention of the authorities.”“Violence or threats of violence against judges or their families strike at the very heart of judicial independence and constitute a blatant assault on the rule of law. Such conduct is not merely an attack upon an individual Judge; it is an attack upon the institution of the judiciary and the constitutional promise that disputes will be resolved by courts free from fear, favour, affection or ill-will,” it added.Also Read | Justice Gautam Patel: Striving for impartial police force a real struggleThe BBA sought a prompt, thorough and effective probe into the matter. It stated that “in a constitutional democracy government by rule of law, judicial decisions may be questioned, criticised and challenged only through lawful means”.“Resort to threats, intimidation, coercion or violence against judges or their families has no place in a civilised society and cannot be tolerated,” it added.On April 23, 2024, two days before his retirement, Justice Patel dismissed a suit challenging Syedna Muffadal Saifuddin’s position as the spiritual head of the Dawoodi Bohra community by his nephew Syedna Taher Fakhruddin.Story continues below this adDelivering the verdict, Justice Patel said he had kept the judgment “as neutral as possible for personalities involved”, noting that “feelings will run high”, and had decided the dispute “on proof and not faith”.The Dawoodi Bohras are a Shia Muslim denomination, traditionally a community of traders and entrepreneurs, with its top religious leader known as the Dai-al-Mutlaq, with lakhs of followers in India and several countries abroad.Justice Patel’s daughter, earlier this month, received an anonymous threat letter, and she was reportedly assaulted in London by a masked man in April and suffered an injury.The retired judge then wrote to the Acting Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court and the Chief Justice of India (CJI) to apprise them of the matter.