The boxing world is divided on whether or not Daniel Dubois’ shot was a low blow. In Oleksandr Usyk and Dubois’ first outing, the latter threw a shot that was ruled as a low blow by the referee.GettyTwo days remain until the score is settled between the rivals[/caption]The ruling in the fifth round led to Usyk taking a medical timeout, which lasted for almost four minutes.When the bout resumed, he went on to beat the Briton via knockout in the ninth round.Following his defeat almost two years ago, Dubois has been on a winning streak, securing three consecutive victories by way of knockout against Jarrell Miller, Filip Hrgovic and Anthony Joshua.Usyk is also in good form, having recently added two wins against Tyson Fury to his perfect 23-0 record.The highly anticipated rematch between Usyk and Dubois is nearly upon us. On July 19, they will go head-to-head in a 12-round clash.As the pair prepare to settle the score, the debate continues on whether or not it was a low blow in their first outing.And here, talkSPORT.com has gathered the opinions of some of the most prominent names in boxing on the matter.Who thought the shot was legal?Tyson FuryGettyUsyk’s foe Fury thinks it was a legal shot[/caption]Fury made his stance on the matter clear, telling Sky Sports: “I thought he lost [to Dubois] and he quit, so he’s a little, quitting [coward].“And once you quit once you’ll always quit, just like we saw with Dubois. He quit too, so that was two quitters fighting each other.“It’s tough to say somebody’s quit, but Usyk quit with a body shot and rattled around the floor like a little [coward] for five minutes, and the other one quit with a jab. But the truth is the truth, and that’s it.“I’ve been hit full-on, right [below the belt] with the hardest punches you’ve ever seen, I didn’t roll around like that.“It is what it is, you’re a fighting man or you’re not, and if you quit once, you will always quit again. My father told me that when I was a child. If you spew it once, you’ll always spew it, and that’s the facts of the matter. End of.”Anthony JoshuaJoshua has lost to both men and he thinks the shot was legalGettyJoshua explained his perspective on the shot: “Probably legal.”“It’s a fight, you get hit, you get hit round the belt, round the leg.“He got hit, and he went down. Legal.”Roy Jones JrJones Jr thinks it was a good shot and not a low blowGetty“I didn’t think it was low, I thought it was a good shot…” said Jones Jr.“Sometimes when it’s borderline, if the cup makes contact it’s gonna hurt you.”Who thought it was a low blow?Eddie HearnHearn says it was unquestionably a low blowGetty“If you punch underneath the waistband, and there is no doubt, and there’s so many different angles and freeze frames,” said Hearn.“He punches up. I don’t know, once the punch goes up it’s obviously higher than where it started. The bottom of the fist was, I don’t know, 10 inches below the waistband. It’s hit his protector. The whole fist lands below the waistband.”“For me, I’m really sorry, but unquestionably a low blow.”Teddy AtlasAtlas calls it a low blow regardless of where it landedGetty Images - GettyAtlas said on his podcast: “It didn’t seem to be on the groin area, it seemed to be on the side.“But it was below the line and below where the cup begins.“It wasn’t dramatically below, but it was below. So it’s technically a low blow, that’s not too hard to define.”Tony BellewGettyBellew says it’s not low his opinion, but as a fact[/caption]Bellew posted his verdict on X: “Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion, that’s a fact! That’s the rules!” “Your shorts shouldn’t cover your naval, cos if they do, the belt can be hit!”Don’t miss Oleksandr Usyk v Daniel Dubois on Saturday July 19, Live only on DAZN. Buy now at DAZN.com/boxingtalkSPORT also has radio rights for the Wembley showdown.Download the talkSPORT app to listen live to our coverage of the undisputed heavyweight clash for free.