Why Nvidia's Stock Looks Relatively Cheap?

Wait 5 sec.

Why Nvidia's Stock Looks Relatively Cheap?NVIDIA CorporationBATS:NVDAKalaGhaziAfter a sluggish start to the year, shares of Nvidia—alongside Broadcom, AMD, and Marvell—are beginning to appear attractively valued, according to analysts at Deutsche Bank. The investment firm noted that when measured by their two-year forward price-to-earnings ratios, these four semiconductor stocks are currently trading at a significant discount relative to their historical valuation averages. A Bargain in the Making Nvidia’s stock, in particular, is emerging as a potential bargain, according to the German bank’s analysts. Following a weak performance in the early months of the year, the artificial intelligence chipmaker’s shares are now trading at approximately 16 times projected earnings for 2027. This multiple stands roughly 45% below the company’s historical median valuation, a disparity that the analysts suggest presents an opportunity for investors to acquire shares at a discounted price. Deutsche Bank’s assessment extends beyond Nvidia. The analysts indicated that Broadcom (AVGO), AMD (AMD), and Marvell Technology (MRVL) are also trading at valuation multiples well below their respective historical norms. Collectively, the firm characterized these four semiconductor companies as looking "relatively cheap" based on their current pricing relative to long-term earnings expectations. What This Means for Investors The valuation analysis comes at a time when Nvidia’s stock has struggled to gain momentum in 2026, despite sustained and even booming demand for its artificial intelligence chips. This disconnect highlights a broader shift in sentiment toward segments of the AI trade that had previously enjoyed significant investor enthusiasm. Nvidia’s shares (NVDA) were trading around $175 on Tuesday, showing little movement for the day and leaving the stock down approximately 6% year-to-date. This performance is notable given the company’s continued strong financial results and its dominant position in the AI chip market. The subdued stock movement contrasts sharply with 2025, when Nvidia’s shares soared by nearly 40%. Diverging Performance Across the Semiconductor Sector The valuation picture varies across the semiconductor landscape. While Marvell’s stock has gained about 8% in 2026, its forward price-to-earnings multiple—comparable to Nvidia’s at around 16 times—is approximately 27% below its long-term median. AMD, meanwhile, trades at a forward multiple that is about 20% below its historical average. Broadcom’s multiple, at roughly 17 times projected earnings, is only about 5% off its long-term median, suggesting a more modest discount relative to its own history. Deutsche Bank analysts noted that not all semiconductor-related firms have experienced the same valuation compression this year. They described the current market dynamics as displaying "puzzling dislocations in relative valuation across the sector," pointing to notable divergences between chip designers and semiconductor equipment manufacturers. In contrast to the four AI-focused chipmakers, semiconductor equipment companies such as KLA Corporation (KLAC), ASML (ASML), and Applied Materials (AMAT) have been categorized by Deutsche Bank as "expensive" based on the same forward-earnings metric. These stocks have posted substantial gains in 2026, soaring approximately 29%, 31%, and 45%, respectively. As a result, they now trade at a premium to their historical valuation norms, standing in stark contrast to the discounted multiples seen among Nvidia and its peers. A Shift in Market Sentiment The analysts’ observations underscore a shifting landscape within the semiconductor sector, where investor enthusiasm appears to have rotated away from some of the high-flying AI chip designers toward equipment manufacturers that have demonstrated resilience and strong performance in the current market environment. For investors, the current valuations may present a decision point: whether to view the discounted multiples of Nvidia and its peers as a buying opportunity or to interpret the sector-wide divergences as a signal to exercise caution.