TLDR:K3 Capital accuses Elixir of misrepresenting a $68M loan to Stream Finance.On-chain data shows Stream’s true deUSD exposure closer to $11M.YAM reports lenders could face losses as redemptions proceed.The case raises transparency concerns in tokenized lending markets.Elixir is under scrutiny after K3 Capital threatened legal action, calling the protocol a “coordinated fraudulent scheme.” The accusations stem from Elixir’s $68 million loan to Stream Finance, which allegedly shifted the platform from a basis trading product into a tokenized fund-of-funds. K3 claims this change introduced higher risk while misrepresenting lender protections. The brewing conflict exposes growing concerns about transparency and collateral management in decentralized finance.K3 Capital Accuses Elixir of Misleading LendersAccording to posts from @yieldsandmore (YAM), K3 Capital alleges Elixir failed to disclose crucial lending risks tied to its partnership with Stream Finance. The report claims Elixir lent $68 million to Stream, fundamentally altering its financial exposure and investor assumptions. K3 argues that lenders were treated as junior capital, absorbing losses rather than the borrower.K3 further claims Elixir’s statement that Stream held 90% of deUSD’s supply, around $75 million, was inaccurate. Instead, Stream allegedly borrowed stablecoins against deUSD across multiple money markets, lowering its real exposure to about $11.34 million. This discrepancy, K3 argues, leaves a $68 million gap in Elixir’s balance sheet.YAM’s analysis suggests that by redeeming deUSD at a one-to-one rate, Elixir ignored the underlying losses. The redeems, according to the post, unfairly favored certain holders while leaving lending market participants at risk. K3 contends that these redemptions should have been paused or adjusted to reflect the shortfall.The report also references several on-chain wallets connected to Stream Finance, verified through DeBank data. Some of these wallets, including those labeled “Stream Main” and “Stream xUSD loop,” appear linked through transaction histories, though not all are confirmed to belong to Stream.The saga continues. @k3_capital is threatening legal action on @elixir, claiming Elixir is a 'coordinated fraudulent scheme' orchestrated by Philip Forte (founder of Elixir) and facilitated by Caleb from Stream Finance'.K3 alledges Elixir misrepresented their product by lending… https://t.co/WcY1D3EWWF pic.twitter.com/33WZUBv5TA— YAM (@yieldsandmore) November 7, 2025On-Chain Data Deepens the ControversyYAM’s findings show wallets possibly tied to Stream or its partners managing loans and redemptions involving (s)deUSD. Several addresses, including 0x1597e4b7…, 0x14bcd9da…, and 0xcb4a7b79…, show active or historic exposure to lending protocols. The investigation claims some wallets may belong to external managers or associates, including individuals allegedly connected to Stream’s operations.Elixir’s decision to allow redemptions despite the loan imbalance raised concerns about fairness among deUSD participants. K3 Capital maintains that the losses should not have been shifted onto lenders in decentralized markets. Analysts following the case noted that such a practice could undermine confidence in similar tokenized credit structures.While YAM clarified that its findings are not legal advice, the post emphasized the need for moral and transparent resolution. It also urged Elixir to address the imbalance before potential litigation escalates. Neither Elixir nor Stream Finance had publicly commented on the allegations at the time of writing.The developing dispute adds pressure on DeFi projects managing on-chain credit systems amid rising demands for clearer collateral transparency.The post Elixir Faces Legal Threats as K3 Capital Alleges $68M Loan Misrepresentation appeared first on Blockonomi.