Two Reclaims, But Not Every Reclaim Is a Good EntryIntuitive Machines, Inc. Class ABATS:LUNRMyViewLabLUNR The main lesson in this chart is not simply that price offered two reclaim opportunities. It is that the trade quality of those reclaim entries was not the same. The earlier reclaim near the end of consolidation may look attractive from a structural point of view, and it did occur closer to the moving averages, but if the reclaim bar itself expanded too aggressively and the distance to invalidation was still too wide, it should not automatically be treated as the “best entry.” The later reclaim higher in the structure may look cleaner visually, but if price is already too far from invalidation, the R:R may also become much less attractive. So the real lesson here is not “if reclaim happens, take it.” The real lesson is: a valid reclaim does not automatically mean a good entry. A reclaim still needs to be evaluated by: structural clarity definable risk how extended the entry already is whether the R:R is still reasonable If the better entry was missed, the later reclaim may be a case of waiting for a second chance — or simply letting it go. Educational example only, not financial advice.