Yeah. I saw your "numbers based on vibez not facts" - do you not see the irony there? You want me to take it seriously although it's not factual? And you doubled down on it as if it holds meaning. Your entire comment was: > Both things can be true though. Given like 1/1000 organic humans use em dashes and 99/100 AI sloppers use them, it’s a pretty good bet the em dash means slop, and the 1/1000 can feel some type of way about it. *numbers based on vibez not on facts. Your entire theory is fabricated but you reply to double down anyway. What is the point of discussing a specious fictitious statement? > And yes, given most humans weigh between 100-250 lbs, there are indeed “tons” that use em dashes in normal conversational writing. Words have to mean something. Just stringing random ones together wastes people's time. And you're contradicting your earlier assertion that there are not nearly as many humans as AI using "em dashes." And then you rewarded my indulgence to your arrogance with this: > But if you think any more than 5% of literate redditors both know and utilize the em dash in the proper use cases, I would check outside the bubbles you’re in and look at Facebook/twitter/instagram/ and Reddit/popular discourse. This is one of those times when a finger gesture would suffice, and in which I am grateful for the block button. Here's a clue though: Social media sites are not representative of the entirety of humanity, so they are not representative for the entirety of writing and expression, either. Your word salad in its own entirety adds up to nothing. Presumption is not insight, clarity, nor wit. You even stooped to take a cheap shot and presume to know thing one about me. Look at instagram?! Are you freaking kidding me. That's rhetorical.