This Bengal election sees weaponisation of ethnicities: Surajit Mukhopadhyay

Wait 5 sec.

WATCH | West Bengal election 2026: Identity politics, vote banks, and the BJP vs Trinamool battleThe sociologist and writer examines how tribal assertions, including the Kurmi demand for Scheduled Tribe status, and broader questions of linguistic and cultural recognition, are influencing key electoral regions such as Jangalmahal and North Bengal. | Video Credit: Host: Suhrid Sankar Chattopadhyay; Editing: Razal Pareed; Producers: Kavya Pradeep M and Mridula VijayarangakumarIn this episode of Frontline Conversations, sociologist and writer Surajit Mukhopadhyay analyses the changing dynamics of the West Bengal Assembly election 2026, focusing on how identity politics has come to shape electoral outcomes in the State. Drawing on historical and sociological insights, he explains how Bengal’s earlier politics—once centred on class and economic inequality under the Left—has gradually shifted towards assertions of ethnic, religious, and regional identities.Mukhopadhyay argues that the decline of Left politics has opened space for what he calls the “politics of primordial identities”, where communities mobilise around ethnicity, religion, and cultural recognition rather than purely economic concerns. He examines how tribal assertions, including the Kurmi demand for Scheduled Tribe status, and broader questions of linguistic and cultural recognition, are influencing key electoral regions such as Jangalmahal and North Bengal.He also explores the growing Hindu-Muslim binary in Bengal politics, while cautioning against simplistic narratives like “vote bank politics”. Instead, he emphasises voter agency, local socio-economic realities, and the role of perception in shaping electoral behaviour. The discussion further unpacks how political parties—including the Trinamool Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party—are navigating and, at times, amplifying identity-based narratives.CONTRIBUTE YOUR COMMENTS