Written by Vineet UpadhyayNew Delhi | December 10, 2025 07:57 PM IST 3 min readLuthra brothers moved transit anticipatory bail in Goa fire caseLuthra brothers, owners of Goa nightclub ‘Birch by Romeo Lane’, where a devastating fire took place on December 6, on Wednesday claimed that “an external third-party performer” was allegedly performing at the restaurant on December 6, when a raging fire snuffed out 25 lives.The plea filed by Saurabh Luthra claims that the performer “bought her own equipment, staff”, and did not use any flammable material.The brothers, residents of Delhi moved court seeking bail in the case registered in connection with the fire tragedy at the nightclub on December 6 which killed 25 persons. The cases are listed for hearing before additional sessions judge Vandana.Also Read | Portion of second club owned by Luthra brothers in Goa razed downRun more than 27 restaurants/establishments all over India and in all places there are operational managers to run the day-to-day operations who carry out regulatory compliances.An external third-party performer was allegedly performing at the restaurant on December 6 who bought her own equipment, staff and did not use any flammable material.Don’t have any personal knowledge about the fire. Frequent traveller and regularly travel to potential restaurant sites within and outside India, sometimes even on short notice.Travelled to Thailand on December 6 for a business meeting in connection with his professional engagements and potential restaurant sites.Doing everything possible to aid the victims, case falls within the category of “rare and exceptional” grant transit anticipatory bail and that he protection to ensure that pre-trial arrest.No useful purpose would be served by arresting him upon his return to India.The offence under Section 105 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) BNS is not made out at all.Offences under Sections 125 (endangering human life or safety through rash or negligent behaviour) and 287 (negligent conduct with respect to fire or combustible matter) are not made.Not in control of the operations at the restaurant and there is no specific role that can be attributed to them.Withdraw look out circular, wish to join the investigation and extend full co-operation.Return to Delhi from Thailand and then to Goa is impaired by the issuance of the LOC.Bulldozing a restaurant named Romeo Lane, Vagator in Goa by authorities on December 9 owned by a company in which he is a director shows the vindictive nature.Give undertaking not to tamper with evidence or influence witnesses.Ready to abide by any condition the court imposes to grant transit anticipatory bail.Will apply for anticipatory bail before the jurisdictional court if and when granted bail.After hearing the pleas for interim relief, additional sessions judge Vandana’s order said, “Considering the submissions, an opportunity is given to file the reply and matter is adjourned for 11.12.2025 at 12.00 pm.”Also Read | ‘Three decades since Uphaar Cinema blaze, but nothing’s changed’: Activist Neelam Krishnamoorthy calls Goa fire ‘deja vu’ © IE Online Media Services Pvt Ltd