Gaikwad, N., Genovese, F. & Tingley, D. Creating climate coalitions: mass preferences for compensating vulnerability in the world’s two largest democracies. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 116, 1165–1183 (2022).Google Scholar Abou-Chadi, T. & Kayser, M. A. It’s not easy being green: why voters punish parties for environmental policies during economic downturns. Elect. Stud. 45, 201–207 (2017).Google Scholar Bechtel, M. M. & Scheve, K. F. Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13763–13768 (2013).CAS Google Scholar Colantone, I., Di Lonardo, L., Margalit, Y. & Percoco, M. The political consequences of green policies: evidence from Italy. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 118, 108–126 (2024).Google Scholar Rodríguez-Pose, A. The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 11, 189–209 (2018).Google Scholar Dalton, R. J. The social transformation of trust in government. Int. Rev. Sociol. 15, 133–154 (2005).Google Scholar Gauchat, G. Politicization of science in the public sphere: a study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. Am. Sociol. Rev. 77, 167–187 (2012).Google Scholar Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).Lunz Trujillo, K. Rural identity as a contributing factor to anti-intellectualism in the US. Political Behav. 44, 1509–1532 (2022).Google Scholar Dubash, N. K. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) 1355–1450 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).Mudde, C. & Kaltwasser, C. R. Populism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford Univ. Press, 2017).Norris, P. Measuring populism worldwide. Party Politics 26, 697–717 (2020).Google Scholar Dickson, Z. P. & Hobolt, S. B. Going against the grain: climate change as a wedge issue for the radical right. Comp. Polit. Stud. 58, 1733–1759 (2024).Patterson, J. J. Backlash to climate policy. Glob. Environ. Politics 23, 68–90 (2023).Google Scholar Biber, E. Climate change and backlash. NYU Environ. Law J. 17, 1295–1366 (2008).Google Scholar Stokes, L. C. Electoral backlash against climate policy: a natural experiment on retrospective voting and local resistance to public policy. Am. J. Political Sci. 60, 958–974 (2016).Google Scholar Isaksson, Z. & Gren, S. Political expectations and electoral responses to wind farm development in Sweden. Energy Policy 186, 113984 (2024).Google Scholar Mitsch, F. & McNeil, A. Political Implications of ‘Green’ Infrastructure in One’s ‘Backyard’: The Green Party’s Catch 22? Working Paper No. 81 (International Inequalities Institute, LSE, 2022).Germeshausen, R., Heim, S. & Wagner, U. J. Support for Renewable Energy: The Case of Wind Power Discussion Paper No. 330 (CRC TR 224, 2023).Furceri, D., Ganslmeier, M. & Ostry, J. Are climate change policies politically costly? Energy Policy 178, 113575 (2023).Google Scholar Otteni, C. & Weisskircher, M. Global warming and polarization. Wind turbines and the electoral success of the greens and the populist radical right. Eur. J. Political Res. 61, 1102–1122 (2022).Google Scholar Daniele, F., de Blasio, G. & Pasquini, A. Is local opposition taking the wind out of the energy transition? Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03022 (2024).Urpelainen, J. & Zhang, A. T. Electoral backlash or positive reinforcement? Wind power and congressional elections in the United States. J. Politics 84, 1306–1321 (2022).Google Scholar Bayulgen, O., Atkinson-Palombo, C., Buchanan, M. & Scruggs, L. Tilting at windmills? Electoral repercussions of wind turbine projects in Minnesota. Energy Policy 159, 112636 (2021).Google Scholar Finnegan, J. J. Changing prices in a changing climate: electoral competition and fossil fuel taxation. Comp. Polit.Stud. 56, 1257–1290 (2023).Google Scholar Voeten, E. The energy transition and support for the radical right: evidence from the Netherlands. Comp. Polit. Stud. 58, 394–428 (2024).Google Scholar De Groote, O., Gautier, A. & Verboven, F. The political economy of financing climate policy—evidence from the solar PV subsidy programs. Resour. Energy Econ. 77, 101436 (2024).Google Scholar Umit, R. & Schaffer, L. M. Attitudes towards carbon taxes across Europe: the role of perceived uncertainty and self-interest. Energy Policy 140, 111385 (2020).Google Scholar Fairbrother, M., Sevä, I. J. & Kulin, J. Political trust and the relationship between climate change beliefs and support for fossil fuel taxes: evidence from a survey of 23 European countries. Glob. Environ. Change 59, 102003 (2019).Google Scholar Stutzmann, S. The Electoral Consequences of the Coal Phase-Out in Germany Working Paper Series No. 26 Cluster of Excellence “The Politics of Inequality” (University of Konstanz, 2024); https://doi.org/10.48787/kops/352-2-1ouknqxwjvwg16Egli, F., Schmid, N. & Schmidt, T. S. Backlash to fossil fuel phase-outs: the case of coal mining in US presidential elections. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 094002 (2022).Google Scholar Bolet, D., Green, F. & Gonzalez-Eguino, M. How to get coal country to vote for climate policy: the effect of a “Just Transition Agreement” on Spanish election results. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 118, 1344–1359 (2024).Gazmararian, A. F. & Krashinsky, L. Driving labor apart: climate policy backlash in the American auto corridor. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4633502 (2023).Kim, J. The electoral consequences of the political divide on climate change. Kyklos 78, 149–185 (2025).Google Scholar Vona, F., Marin, G., Consoli, D. & Popp, D. Environmental regulation and green skills: an empirical exploration. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Economists 5, 713–753 (2018).Google Scholar Vona, F., Marin, G. & Consoli, D. Measures, drivers and effects of green employment: evidence from US local labor markets, 2006–2014. J. Econ. Geogr. 19, 1021–1048 (2019).Google Scholar Cavallotti, E., Colantone, I., Stanig, P. & Vona, F. Green Collars at the Voting Booth: Material Interest and Environmental Voting FEEM Working Paper No. 09-2025 (FEEM, 2025); https://ssrn.com/abstract=5183183Heddesheimer, V., Hilbig, H. & Voeten, E. The green transition and political polarization along occupational lines. Preprint at https://osf.io/preprints/osf/876dr_v1 (2024).Bechtel, M. M., Genovese, F. & Scheve, K. F. Interests, norms and support for the provision of global public goods: the case of climate co-operation. Br. J. Political Sci. 49, 1333–1355 (2019).Google Scholar De Sario, G., Marin, G. & Sacchi, A. Citizens’ attitudes towards climate mitigation policies: the role of occupational exposure in EU countries. Kyklos 76, 255–280 (2023).Google Scholar Gemenis, K., Katsanidou, A. & Vasilopoulou, S. The politics of anti-environmentalism: positional issue framing by the European radical right. In Proc. 62nd Annual Political Studies Association Conference 12–15 (2012).Schwörer, J. & Fernández-García, B. Climate sceptics or climate nationalists? Understanding and explaining populist radical right parties’ positions towards climate change (1990–2022). Political Stud. 72, 1178–1202 (2023).Google Scholar De Vries, C. E. & Hobolt, S. Political Entrepreneurs: The Rise of Challenger Parties in Europe (Princeton Univ. Press, 2020).Mudde, C. The populist zeitgeist. Gov. Oppos. 39, 541–563 (2004).Google Scholar Lockwood, M. Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: exploring the linkages. Environ. Politics 27, 712–732 (2018).Google Scholar Cremaschi, S., Bariletto, N. & De Vries, C. E. Without roots: the political consequences of collective economic shocks. Am. Political Sci. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055425000073 (2025).Küppers, A. ‘Climate-Soviets,’ ‘alarmism,’ and ‘eco-dictatorship’: the framing of climate change scepticism by the populist radical right Alternative for Germany. Ger. Politics 33, 1–21 (2022).Oswald, M. T., Fromm, M. & Broda, E. Strategic clustering in right-wing-populism? ‘Green policies’ in Germany and France. Z. Vgl. Polit. 15, 185–205 (2021).Google Scholar Vihma, A., Reischl, G. & Nonbo Andersen, A. A climate backlash: comparing populist parties’ climate policies in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden. J. Environ. Dev. 30, 219–239 (2021).Google Scholar Alarcón Ferrari, C. Contemporary land questions in Sweden, far-right populist strategies and challenges for inclusionary rural development. Sociol. Rural. 60, 833–856 (2020).Google Scholar Forchtner, B. & Kølvraa, C. The nature of nationalism: populist radical right parties on countryside and climate. Nat. Cult. 10, 199–224 (2015).Google Scholar Lubarda, B. ‘Homeland farming’ or ‘rural emancipation’? The discursive overlap between populist and green parties in Hungary. Sociol. Rural. 60, 810–832 (2020).Google Scholar Bednar-Friedl, B. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 1817–1927 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ Press, 2022).De Kleer, D., van Teutem, S. & De Vries, C. E. Public support for pro-climate and counter-climate protests. Preprint at https://osf.io/preprints/osf/z7uvt_v1 (2024).Bashir, N. Y., Lockwood, P., Chasteen, A. L., Nadolny, D. & Noyes, I. The ironic impact of activists: negative stereotypes reduce social change influence. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 43, 614–626 (2013).Google Scholar Colvin, R. et al. Theorising unconventional climate advocates and their relationship to the environmental movement. npj Clim. Action 4, 11 (2025).Google Scholar Otjes, S. & Krouwel, A. Environmental policy preferences and economic interests in the nature/agriculture and climate/energy dimension in the Netherlands. Rural Sociol. 87, 901–935 (2022).Google Scholar Bergeson, L. L. The Trump administration and likely impacts on environmental law and policy. Environ. Qual. Manag. 26, 97–102 (2017).Google Scholar Bomberg, E. Environmental politics in the Trump era: an early assessment. Environ. Politics 26, 956–963 (2017).Google Scholar Bomberg, E. The environmental legacy of President Trump. Policy Stud. 42, 628–645 (2021).Google Scholar Jotzo, F., Depledge, J. & Winkler, H. US and international climate policy under President Trump. Clim. Policy 18, 813–817 (2018).Google Scholar Selby, J. The Trump presidency, climate change, and the prospect of a disorderly energy transition. Rev. Int. Stud. 45, 471–490 (2019).Google Scholar Ćetković, S. & Hagemann, C. Changing climate for populists? Examining the influence of radical-right political parties on low-carbon energy transitions in western Europe. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 66, 101571 (2020).Google Scholar Huber, R. A., Maltby, T., Szulecki, K. & Ćetković, S. Is populism a challenge to European energy and climate policy? Empirical evidence across varieties of populism. J. Eur. Public Policy 28, 998–1017 (2021).Google Scholar Jahn, D. Quick and dirty: how populist parties in government affect greenhouse gas emissions in EU member states. J. Eur. Public Policy 28, 980–997 (2021).Google Scholar Colantone, I. & Stanig, P. The surge of economic nationalism in western Europe. J. Econ. Perspect. 33, 128–151 (2019).Google Scholar Guriev, S. & Papaioannou, E. The political economy of populism. J. Econ. Lit. 60, 753–832 (2022).Google Scholar Lockwood, B. & Lockwood, M. How do right-wing populist parties influence climate and renewable energy policies? Evidence from OECD countries. Glob. Environ. Politics 22, 12–37 (2022).Google Scholar Stevis, D. & Felli, R. Global labour unions and just transition to a green economy. Int. Environ. Agreem. Politics Law Econ. 15, 29–43 (2015).Google Scholar Vona, F. Job losses and political acceptability of climate policies: why the ‘job-killing’ argument is so persistent and how to overturn it. Clim. Policy 19, 524–532 (2019).Google Scholar Bez, C., Bosetti, V., Colantone, I. & Zanardi, M. Exposure to international trade lowers green voting and worsens environmental attitudes. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 1131–1135 (2023).Google Scholar Huber, R. A. The role of populist attitudes in explaining climate change skepticism and support for environmental protection. Environ. Politics 29, 959–982 (2020).Google Scholar Kulin, J., Johansson Sevä, I. & Dunlap, R. E. Nationalist ideology, rightwing populism, and public views about climate change in Europe. Environ. Politics 30, 1111–1134 (2021).Google Scholar Fisher, S. D., Kenny, J., Poortinga, W., Böhm, G. & Steg, L. The politicisation of climate change attitudes in Europe. Elect. Stud. 79, 102499 (2022).Google Scholar Yan, P., Schroeder, R. & Stier, S. Is there a link between climate change scepticism and populism? An analysis of web tracking and survey data from Europe and the US. Inf. Commun. Soc. 25, 1400–1439 (2022).Google Scholar Kitt, S., Axsen, J., Long, Z. & Rhodes, E. The role of trust in citizen acceptance of climate policy: comparing perceptions of government competence, integrity and value similarity. Ecol. Econ. 183, 106958 (2021).Google Scholar Krange, O., Kaltenborn, B. P. & Hultman, M. “Don’t confuse me with facts”—how right wing populism affects trust in agencies advocating anthropogenic climate change as a reality. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 8, 255 (2021).Google Scholar Huber, R. A., Greussing, E. & Eberl, J.-M. From populism to climate scepticism: the role of institutional trust and attitudes towards science. Environ. Politics 31, 1115–1138 (2022).Google Scholar Meijers, M. J., Van Drunen, Y. & Jacobs, K. It’s a hoax! The mediating factors of populist climate policy opposition. West Eur. Politics 46, 1288–1311 (2023).Google Scholar Gilli, M., Calcaterra, M., Emmerling, J. & Granella, F. Climate change impacts on the within-country income distributions. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 127, 103012 (2024).Google Scholar Dechezleprêtre, A. et al. Fighting Climate Change: International Attitudes Toward Climate Policies Working Paper No. 30265 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2022).Cremaschi, S. & Stanig, P. Voting and climate change: how an extreme weather event increased support for a radical-right incumbent in Italy. Preprint at https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/734248?journalCode=jop (2024).Download references