ReutersEmily Damari, pictured hugging her mother, was released in January after being held hostage by Hamas for 471 daysA British-Israeli woman held hostage by Hamas has said Sir Keir Starmer is "not standing on the right side of history" with his pledge to recognise a Palestinian state.Emily Damari, who was released in January after being held by Hamas for more than 15 months, said the UK prime minister "risks rewarding terror".Sir Keir announced on Tuesday that the UK would recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel met certain conditions, including agreeing a ceasefire and reviving the prospect of a two-state solution.Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the UK's stance rewarded "Hamas' monstrous terrorism".UK to recognise Palestinian state unless Israel meets conditionsFamine 'currently playing out' in Gaza, UN-backed experts warnFrance will recognise Palestinian state, Macron saysMs Damari, whose mother Mandy is originally from south London, was shot in the leg and hand when she was dragged from her home on Kibbutz Kfar Aza on 7 October 2023. Hamas also shot and killed her dog.She was taken from the safe room of her house with her friends Ziv and Gali Berman.The 27-year-old twins are still being held by Hamas and Ms Damari said she is doing all she can to get them and the other 50 hostages - not all of them alive - back to their families in Israel.In a post on social media, Ms Damari wrote: "Prime Minister Starmer is not standing on the right side of history. Had he been in power during World War II, would he have advocated recognition for Nazi control of occupied countries like Holland, France or Poland?"She later posted: "This move does not advance peace - it risks rewarding terror. It sends a dangerous message: that violence earns legitimacy. By legitimising a state entity while Hamas still controls Gaza and continues its campaign of terror, the prime minister is not promoting a solution; he is prolonging the conflict."Recognition under these conditions emboldens extremists and undermines any hope for genuine peace. Shame on you!"Her post followed a statement from lawyers representing British families with relatives who were, or are, still hostages, expressing their concerns about the prime minister's statement.They said: "We are concerned that the UK's proposal risks delaying the release of the hostages."This is because the UK has said that it will recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel agrees a ceasefire. But the risk is that Hamas will continue to refuse a ceasefire because if it agrees to one this would make UK recognition less likely."The families are therefore deeply concerned that the UK's approach risks disincentivising Hamas from releasing the hostages. This risks doing exactly what the prime minister's statement says the UK will not do: reward Hamas for its heinous and illegal acts."The British hostage families take no position on the wider politics. Their concern is to bring their loved ones home, and time is fast running out."They therefore implore the prime minister to provide clarity and confirm, unambiguously, that Hamas will not be rewarded and that the UK will not take any substantive steps until all the hostages are free."'We need moral clarity'Steve Brisley's British-Israeli sister and nieces, Lianne, Noiya and Yahel Sharabi were murdered on 7 October.His brother-in-law Eli Sharabi was released as a hostage earlier this year, looking emaciated and weak. Eli's brother's body is still being held hostage by Hamas.Speaking from Wales, Mr Brisley said he was "disappointed" with the prime minister's statement and there should be no recognition of a Palestinian state unless the hostages are released."My concern about the statement is it potentially incentivizes Hamas to continue to hold those hostages, just waiting until September, until a Palestinian state is recognised by the UK."There is a deadline for what is expected of Israel, but no similar deadline set for what is expected from Hamas."He added: "I think we need clarity that the release of the hostages will bring this to an end."Foreign Secretary David Lammy told the BBC that the world had seen "the most horrific scenes" in Gaza and the time had come "to abate the suffering of the Palestinian people".Speaking at the UN in New York, he told the BBC's Tom Bateman that Tuesday's announcement "puts us on a pathway towards recognition".He added: "It is my sincere hope that the decision that we have taken today affects the situation on the ground, and we get to that ceasefire, we get to those hostages coming out as soon as possible."Can Starmer's Palestinian pledge be more than symbolic gesture?Lammy hopes plan to recognise Palestinian state 'will get ceasefire'The delicate politics behind the UK's move on Palestine