The most Machiavellian move imaginable would be for Trump’s DOJ to orchestrate a deal in which Ghislaine Maxwell names only those he seeks to punish, Democrats and personal enemies, while fully exonerating him and his inner circle. Naturally, her testimony would need to be meticulously crafted to avoid direct conflict with existing evidence, lending it a veneer of credibility while serving a calculated political agenda. Excerpts: Let’s start with what should be on every headline in America: This week, Donald Trump’s Department of Justice met with Ghislaine Maxwell. Not once, but twice. For hours. Behind closed doors. Led by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who also just happens to be Trump’s personal defense attorney. The woman convicted of grooming, recruiting, and trafficking children—who spent years delivering girls into the hands of billionaires like party favors at a predator’s banquet—is now the GOP’s star witness in their depraved little theatre of deflection, trotted out not for justice, but for cover. And what did she get in return for her sudden cooperation? We don’t yet have that full answer, but we do know one thing she did get… limited immunity. And the simple, gut-wrenching truth here is this: no one cuts deals with monsters unless they are terrified of the truth those monsters could unleash. And no one empowers a trafficker—unless they have something they need to keep buried. We all know Maxwell is not confessing out of remorse. She’s not testifying to protect the next generation. She is bartering for her freedom. She is dangling names—real or invented—like raw meat, hoping the MAGA machine will give her the one thing she doesn’t deserve: mercy. And all she has to do is protect Donald Trump and bury the truth. This isn’t justice. It’s obstruction wrapped in perfume and pearls. Maxwell was convicted on five counts: Conspiracy to entice minors to engage in illegal sex acts Conspiracy to transport minors with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity Transporting a minor for the purpose of sexual abuse Conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors Sex trafficking of a minor She wasn’t a bystander. She was a predator in couture. She approached 14-year-old girls at gyms, malls, and schools. She promised them opportunity. She offered shopping trips, tutoring, life-changing connections. Then she delivered them into hell. She didn’t just witness the abuse. She trained them to endure it. She participated. She profited. She destroyed lives with manicured ease. Hundreds of them. And now? Newsmax is calling her a “victim.” As if her Cartier bracelets somehow shackled her into complicity. As if this wasn’t a choice—a career—built on the suffering of children. The rebranding of a trafficker into a misunderstood accomplice is not just revisionist. It’s perverse.   submitted by   /u/D-R-AZ   to   r/law [link]   [comments]