van Dijk, M. et al. A meta-analysis of projected global food demand and population at risk of hunger for the period 2010–2050. Nat. Food 2, 494–501 (2021).PubMed Google Scholar Hasegawa, T. et al. Extreme climate events increase risk of global food insecurity and adaptation needs. Nat. Food 2, 587–595 (2021).PubMed Google Scholar Zhang, H. et al. A Gγ protein regulates alkaline sensitivity in crops. Science 379, eade8416 (2023).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Singh, B. K. et al. Climate change impacts on plant pathogens, food security and paths forward. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 640–656 (2023).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Potapov, P. et al. Global maps of cropland extent and change show accelerated cropland expansion in the twenty-first century. Nat. Food 3, 19–28 (2022).PubMed Google Scholar Crow, J. F. 90 years ago: the beginning of hybrid maize. Genetics 148, 923–928 (1998).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Pingali, P. L. Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12302–12308 (2012).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Green, J. M. The benefits of herbicide-resistant crops. Pest. Manag. Sci. 68, 1323–1331 (2012).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Lu, Y. et al. Widespread adoption of Bt cotton and insecticide decrease promotes biocontrol services. Nature 487, 362–365 (2012).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Mascher, M. et al. Promises and challenges of crop translational genomics. Nature 636, 585–593 (2024).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Yu, X. et al. Single-cell and spatial multi-omics in the plant sciences: technical advances, applications, and perspectives. Plant Commun. 4, 100508 (2023).PubMed Google Scholar Yu, H. et al. A route to de novo domestication of wild allotetraploid rice. Cell 184, 1156–1170 (2021). This study demonstrates the rapid neo-domestication of wild rice relatives, a new paradigm in enriching crop genetic resources and accelerating crop improvement.CAS PubMed Google Scholar Li, T. et al. Domestication of wild tomato is accelerated by genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1160–1163 (2018).CAS Google Scholar Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Kortemme, T. De novo protein design—from new structures to programmable functions. Cell 187, 526–544 (2024).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Silver, D. et al. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 529, 484–489 (2016).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Listov, D. et al. Opportunities and challenges in design and optimization of protein function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 639–653 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Yang, W. et al. Crop phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping: past decades, current challenges, and future perspectives. Mol. Plant 13, 187–214 (2020).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Shen, S. et al. Metabolomics-centered mining of plant metabolic diversity and function: Past decade and future perspectives. Mol. Plant 16, 43–63 (2023).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Li, B. et al. Targeted genome-modification tools and their advanced applications in crop breeding. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 603–622 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Scossa, F. et al. Integrating multi-omics data for crop improvement. J. Plant Physiol. 257, 153352 (2021).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Torres-Rodríguez, J. V. et al. Evolving best practices for transcriptome-wide association studies accelerate discovery of gene-phenotype links. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 83, 102670 (2025).PubMed Google Scholar Goff, S. A. et al. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science 296, 92–100 (2002).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Li, H. & Durbin, R. Genome assembly in the telomere-to-telomere era. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 658–670 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Chen, J. et al. A complete telomere-to-telomere assembly of the maize genome. Nat. Genet. 55, 1221–1231 (2023).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Qin, P. et al. Pan-genome analysis of 33 genetically diverse rice accessions reveals hidden genomic variations. Cell 184, 3542–3558 (2021).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Tang, D. et al. Genome evolution and diversity of wild and cultivated potatoes. Nature 606, 535–541 (2022). Sequencing and analysis of genomes from wild and cultivated potatoes enables identification of candidate genes for many traits, including a transcription factor for tuber formation.CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Liu, Y. et al. Pan-genome of wild and cultivated soybeans. Cell 182, 162–176 (2020).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Hufford, M. B. et al. De novo assembly, annotation, and comparative analysis of 26 diverse maize genomes. Science 373, 655–662 (2021).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Jayakodi, M. et al. Structural variation in the pangenome of wild and domesticated barley. Nature 636, 654–662 (2024).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Jiao, C. et al. Pan-genome bridges wheat structural variations with habitat and breeding. Nature 637, 384–393 (2024).PubMed Google Scholar Sun, W. et al. Genetic modification of Gγ subunit AT1 enhances salt-alkali tolerance in main graminaceous crops. Natl Sci. Rev. 10, nwad075 (2023). This study demonstrates that elite alleles cloned from one crop can be rapidly translated into other crops, facilitated by crop genomics, mutant collections and genome editing.PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Varshney, R. K. et al. A chickpea genetic variation map based on the sequencing of 3,366 genomes. Nature 599, 622–627 (2021). This study demonstrates some valuable breeding strategies from sequencing and analysis of cultivated and wild chickpea accessions.CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Wei, X. et al. Genomic investigation of 18,421 lines reveals the genetic architecture of rice. Science 385, eadm8762 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Cheng, S. et al. Harnessing landrace diversity empowers wheat breeding. Nature 632, 823–831 (2024). This study provides a framework for fully utilizing genetic diversity in more than 1,000 wheat landraces and cultivars for wheat improvement through sequencing and in-depth field phenotyping.CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Zhang, J. et al. Releasing a sugar brake generates sweeter tomato without yield penalty. Nature 635, 647–656 (2024).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Zhang, Y. et al. Structural variation reshapes population gene expression and trait variation in 2,105 Brassica napus accessions. Nat. Genet. 56, 2538–2550 (2024).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Wang, W. et al. Genomic variation in 3,010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice. Nature 557, 43–49 (2018).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Yang, N. et al. Two teosintes made modern maize. Science 382, eadg8940 (2023).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Gu, Z. et al. Structure and function of rice hybrid genomes reveal genetic basis and optimal performance of heterosis. Nat. Genet. 55, 1745–1756 (2023).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Wu, Y. et al. Phylogenomic discovery of deleterious mutations facilitates hybrid potato breeding. Cell 186, 2313–2328 (2023).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Alemu, A. et al. Genomic selection in plant breeding: key factors shaping two decades of progress. Mol. Plant 17, 552–578 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Mueller, U. G. & Linksvayer, T. A. Microbiome breeding: conceptual and practical issues. Trends Microbiol. 30, 997–1011 (2022).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Schmitz, L. et al. Synthetic bacterial community derived from a desert rhizosphere confers salt stress resilience to tomato in the presence of a soil microbiome. ISME J. 16, 1907–1920 (2022).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Yue, H. et al. Host genotype-specific rhizosphere fungus enhances drought resistance in wheat. Microbiome 12, 44 (2024).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Kwak, M.-J. et al. Rhizosphere microbiome structure alters to enable wilt resistance in tomato. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1100–1109 (2018).CAS Google Scholar Zhang, L. et al. A highly conserved core bacterial microbiota with nitrogen-fixation capacity inhabits the xylem sap in maize plants. Nat. Commun. 13, 3361 (2022).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Huang, R. et al. Natural variation at OsCERK1 regulates arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in rice. New Phytol. 225, 1762–1776 (2020).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Zhang, J. et al. NRT1.1B is associated with root microbiota composition and nitrogen use in field-grown rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 676–684 (2019).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Su, P. et al. Microbiome homeostasis on rice leaves is regulated by a precursor molecule of lignin biosynthesis. Nat. Commun. 15, 23 (2024).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Weisberg, A. J. et al. Genomic approaches to plant-pathogen epidemiology and diagnostics. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 59, 311–332 (2021).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Thilliez, G. J. A. et al. Pathogen enrichment sequencing (PenSeq) enables population genomic studies in oomycetes. New Phytol. 221, 1634–1648 (2019).PubMed Google Scholar Brooks, E. G. et al. Plant promoters and terminators for high-precision bioengineering. Biodes. Res. 5, 0013 (2023).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Gabriel, L. et al. BRAKER3: fully automated genome annotation using RNA-seq and protein evidence with GeneMark-ETP, AUGUSTUS, and TSEBRA. Genome Res. 34, 769–777 (2024).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Yang, C. et al. Rice metabolic regulatory network spanning the entire life cycle. Mol. Plant 15, 258–275 (2022).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Zhu, G. et al. Rewiring of the fruit metabolome in tomato breeding. Cell 172, 249–261 (2018). This study uses metabolomics to demonstrate how breeding has made tomato more edible.CAS PubMed Google Scholar Sreenivasulu, N. et al. Metabolic signatures from genebank collections: an underexploited resource for human health? Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 14, 183–202 (2023).PubMed Google Scholar Bai, Y. et al. Natural history-guided omics reveals plant defensive chemistry against leafhopper pests. Science 375, eabm2948 (2022).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Sha, G. et al. Genome editing of a rice CDP-DAG synthase confers multipathogen resistance. Nature 618, 1017–1023 (2023). Saturated targeted mutagenesis enabled by multiplexed genome editing optimizes the RBL1 allele in balancing immunity and growth, making the unusable allele valuable in rice breeding.CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Michaelis, A. C. et al. The social and structural architecture of the yeast protein interactome. Nature 624, 192–200 (2023).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Bilbao, A. et al. PeakDecoder enables machine learning-based metabolite annotation and accurate profiling in multidimensional mass spectrometry measurements. Nat. Commun. 14, 2461 (2023).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Alseekh, S. & Fernie, A. R. Metabolomics 20 years on: what have we learned and what hurdles remain? Plant J. 94, 933–942 (2018).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Marand, A. P. et al. A cis-regulatory atlas in maize at single-cell resolution. Cell 184, 3041–3055 (2021).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Swift, J. et al. Exaptation of ancestral cell-identity networks enables C4 photosynthesis. Nature 636, 143–150 (2024).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Ortiz-Ramírez, C. et al. Ground tissue circuitry regulates organ complexity in maize and Setaria. Science 374, 1247–1252 (2021).PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Omary, M. et al. A conserved superlocus regulates above- and belowground root initiation. Science 375, eabf4368 (2022).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Zhang, T. Q. et al. Single-cell transcriptome atlas and chromatin accessibility landscape reveal differentiation trajectories in the rice root. Nat. Commun. 12, 2053 (2021).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Wang, Q. et al. Single-cell transcriptome atlas reveals developmental trajectories and a novel metabolic pathway of catechin esters in tea leaves. Plant Biotechnol. J. 20, 2089–2106 (2022).PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Wang, H. et al. Molecular regulation of oil gland development and biosynthesis of essential oils in Citrus spp. Science 383, 659–666 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Li, C. et al. Single-cell multi-omics in the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 1031–1041 (2023).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Xu, X. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing of developing maize ears facilitates functional analysis and trait candidate gene discovery. Dev. Cell 56, 557–568 (2021). This study integrates single-cell omics with GWASs in crops to identify genes associated with yield.CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Nobori, T. et al. A rare PRIMER cell state in plant immunity. Nature 638, 197–205 (2025).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Serrano, K. et al. Spatial co-transcriptomics reveals discrete stages of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nat. Plants 10, 673–688 (2024).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Liu, Z. et al. Single-nucleus transcriptomes reveal spatiotemporal symbiotic perception and early response in Medicago. Nat. Plants 9, 1734–1748 (2023).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Rhaman, M. S. et al. Opportunities and challenges in advancing plant research with single-cell omics. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 22, qzae026 (2024).PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Qin, Y. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals fate determination control of an individual fibre cell initiation in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Plant Biotechnol. J. 20, 2372–2388 (2022).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Wang, Y. et al. A spatial transcriptome map of the developing maize ear. Nat. Plants 10, 815–827 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Chau, T. N. et al. Advancing plant single-cell genomics with foundation models. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 82, 102666 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Zhang, X. et al. A spatially resolved multi-omic single-cell atlas of soybean development. Cell 188, 550–567 (2024).PubMed Google Scholar Tosches, M. A. & Lee, H. J. Cellular atlases of the entire mouse brain. Nature 624, 253–255 (2023).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Tuncel, A., Pan, C., Clem, J. S., Liu, D. & Qi, Y. CRISPR–Cas applications in agriculture and plant research. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 26, 419–441 (2025).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Liu, H. J. et al. High-throughput CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis streamlines trait gene identification in maize. Plant Cell 32, 1397–1413 (2020).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Bai, M. et al. Generation of a multiplex mutagenesis population via pooled CRISPR–Cas9 in soya bean. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 721–731 (2020).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Meng, X. et al. Construction of a genome-wide mutant library in rice using CRISPR/Cas9. Mol. Plant 10, 1238–1241 (2017).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Bi, M. et al. Construction of transcription factor mutagenesis population in tomato using a pooled CRISPR/Cas9 plasmid library. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 205, 108094 (2023).CAS PubMed Google Scholar He, J. et al. Genome-scale targeted mutagenesis in Brassica napus using a pooled CRISPR library. Genome Res. 33, 798–809 (2023).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Li, C. et al. Targeted, random mutagenesis of plant genes with dual cytosine and adenine base editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 875–882 (2020).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Xu, R. et al. Identification of herbicide resistance OsACC1 mutations via in planta prime-editing-library screening in rice. Nat. Plants 7, 888–892 (2021).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Beying, N. et al. CRISPR–Cas9-mediated induction of heritable chromosomal translocations in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 6, 638–645 (2020).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Rönspies, M. et al. CRISPR–Cas-mediated chromosome engineering for crop improvement and synthetic biology. Nat. Plants 7, 566–573 (2021).PubMed Google Scholar Sun, C. et al. Precise integration of large DNA sequences in plant genomes using PrimeRoot editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 316–327 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Dong, O. X. et al. Marker-free carotenoid-enriched rice generated through targeted gene insertion using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat. Commun. 11, 1178 (2020).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Lu, Y. et al. A donor-DNA-free CRISPR/Cas-based approach to gene knock-up in rice. Nat. Plants 7, 1445–1452 (2021).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Li, S. et al. Genome-edited powdery mildew resistance in wheat without growth penalties. Nature 602, 455–460 (2022). This study demonstrates the ability to use multiplex genome editing to breed elite wheat germplasm with enhanced disease resistance and increased yields through altering chromatin structure.CAS PubMed Google Scholar Schwartz, C. et al. CRISPR–Cas9-mediated 75.5-Mb inversion in maize. Nat. Plants 6, 1427–1431 (2020).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Rönspies, M. et al. CRISPR/Cas-mediated chromosome engineering: opening up a new avenue for plant breeding. J. Exp. Bot. 72, 177–183 (2021).PubMed Google Scholar Rodríguez-Leal, D. et al. Engineering quantitative trait variation for crop improvement by genome editing. Cell 171, 470–480 (2017). This study presents a new approach to regulate gene transcription and explore the biology of quantitative trait loci using CRISPR–Cas9.PubMed Google Scholar Xue, C. et al. Tuning plant phenotypes by precise, graded downregulation of gene expression. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1758–1764 (2023). This study introduces a new strategy to downregulate protein translation and precisely modulate plant phenotypes by engineering uORFs.CAS PubMed Google Scholar Zhang, H. et al. Genome editing of upstream open reading frames enables translational control in plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 894–898 (2018).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Xing, S. et al. Fine-tuning sugar content in strawberry. Genome Biol. 21, 230 (2020).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Song, X. et al. Targeting a gene regulatory element enhances rice grain yield by decoupling panicle number and size. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1403–1411 (2022).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Tian, J. et al. Engineering disease-resistant plants with alternative translation efficiency by switching uORF types through CRISPR. Sci. China Life Sci. 67, 1715–1726 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Kim, N. et al. Deep learning models to predict the editing efficiencies and outcomes of diverse base editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 484–497 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Yu, G. et al. Prediction of efficiencies for diverse prime editing systems in multiple cell types. Cell 186, 2256–2272 (2023).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Replogle, J. M. et al. Mapping information-rich genotype-phenotype landscapes with genome-scale Perturb-seq. Cell 185, 2559–2575 (2022).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Jiang, K. et al. Rapid in silico directed evolution by a protein language model with EVOLVEpro. Science 387, eadr6006 (2024).Google Scholar He, Y. et al. Protein language models-assisted optimization of a uracil-N-glycosylase variant enables programmable T-to-G and T-to-C base editing. Mol. Cell 84, 1257–1270 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Huang, J. et al. Discovery of deaminase functions by structure-based protein clustering. Cell 186, 3182–3195 (2023).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Pacesa, M. et al. Past, present, and future of CRISPR genome editing technologies. Cell 187, 1076–1100 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Wang, J. et al. Scaffolding protein functional sites using deep learning. Science 377, 387–394 (2022).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Qu, Y. et al. CRISPR-GPT: an LLM agent for automated design of gene-editing experiments. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.25.591003 (2024).Huang, P. S. et al. The coming of age of de novo protein design. Nature 537, 320–327 (2016).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Bennett, N. R. et al. Atomically accurate de novo design of antibodies with RFdiffusion. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.14.585103 (2024). This research proposed a computational design algorithm that can design antibodies to bind user-specified epitopes.Sesterhenn, F. et al. De novo protein design enables the precise induction of RSV-neutralizing antibodies. Science 368, eaay5051 (2020).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Notin, P. et al. Machine learning for functional protein design. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 216–228 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Zambaldi, V. et al. De novo design of high-affinity protein binders with AlphaProteo. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.08022 (2024).Baker, D. & Church, G. Protein design meets biosecurity. Science 383, 349 (2024).PubMed Google Scholar Yeh, A. H. et al. De novo design of luciferases using deep learning. Nature 614, 774–780 (2023).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Wang, J. et al. Protein design using structure-prediction networks: AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold as protein structure foundation models. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 16, a041472 (2024).CAS Google Scholar Cao, L. et al. Design of protein-binding proteins from the target structure alone. Nature 605, 551–560 (2022). This study provides a general approach to design protein binders.CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Watson, J. L. et al. De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion. Nature 620, 1089–1100 (2023).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Wu, K. et al. Sequence-specific targeting of intrinsically disordered protein regions. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.15.603480 (2024).Kourelis, J. et al. NLR immune receptor–nanobody fusions confer plant disease resistance. Science 379, 934–939 (2023).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Ortiz, D. et al. Recognition of the Magnaporthe oryzae effector AVR-Pia by the decoy domain of the rice NLR immune receptor RGA5. Plant Cell 29, 156–168 (2017).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Yang, J. et al. Enzymatic degradation of deoxynivalenol with the engineered detoxification enzyme Fhb7. JACS Au 4, 619–634 (2024).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Frank, C. et al. Scalable protein design using optimization in a relaxed sequence space. Science 386, 439–445 (2024).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Herud-Sikimić, O. et al. A biosensor for the direct visualization of auxin. Nature 592, 768–772 (2021).PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Li, W. et al. Tissue-specific accumulation of pH-sensing phosphatidic acid determines plant stress tolerance. Nat. Plants 5, 1012–1021 (2019).CAS PubMed Google Scholar An, L. et al. Binding and sensing diverse small molecules using shape-complementary pseudocycles. Science 385, 276–282 (2024).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Krishna, R. et al. Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with RoseTTAFold All-Atom. Science 384, eadl2528 (2024). This study develops RoseTTAFold All-Atom and RoseTTAFold diffusion All-Atom, which allow researchers to predict protein–biomolecule complexes and design small molecule binders, respectively.CAS PubMed Google Scholar Lu, L. et al. De novo design of drug-binding proteins with predictable binding energy and specificity. Science 384, 106–112 (2024).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Horaruang, W. et al. Engineering a K+ channel ‘sensory antenna’ enhances stomatal kinetics, water use efficiency and photosynthesis. Nat. Plants 8, 1262–1274 (2022).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Wang, X. et al. Structural insights into ion selectivity and transport mechanisms of Oryza sativa HKT2;1 and HKT2;2/1 transporters. Nat. Plants 10, 633–644 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Xu, C. et al. Computational design of transmembrane pores. Nature 585, 129–134 (2020).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Scott, A. J. et al. Constructing ion channels from water-soluble α-helical barrels. Nat. Chem. 13, 643–650 (2021).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Bi, G. et al. The ZAR1 resistosome is a calcium-permeable channel triggering plant immune signaling. Cell 184, 3528–3541 (2021).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Wang, W. et al. WeiTsing, a pericycle-expressed ion channel, safeguards the stele to confer clubroot resistance. Cell 186, 2656–2671 (2023).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Förderer, A. et al. A wheat resistosome defines common principles of immune receptor channels. Nature 610, 532–539 (2022).PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Liu, F. et al. Activation of the helper NRC4 immune receptor forms a hexameric resistosome. Cell 187, 4877–4889 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Berhanu, S. et al. Sculpting conducting nanopore size and shape through de novo protein design. Science 385, 282–288 (2024).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Liu, Y. et al. Bottom-up design of calcium channels from defined selectivity filter geometry. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.19.629320 (2024).Zheng, K. et al. ESM All-Atom: multi-scale protein language model for unified molecular modeling. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.12995 (2024).Collins, A. S. P. et al. Parallel, continuous monitoring and quantification of programmed cell death in plant tissue. Adv. Sci. 11, 2400225 (2024).CAS Google Scholar Borowsky, A. T. & Bailey-Serres, J. Rewiring gene circuitry for plant improvement. Nat. Genet. 56, 1574–1582 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Oliva, R. et al. Broad-spectrum resistance to bacterial blight in rice using genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1344–1350 (2019).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Chen, Z. et al. De novo design of protein logic gates. Science 368, 78–84 (2020).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Rui, Z. et al. High-throughput proximal ground crop phenotyping systems—a comprehensive review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 224, 109108 (2024).Google Scholar Li, G. et al. The sequences of 1504 mutants in the model rice variety Kitaake facilitate rapid functional genomic studies. Plant Cell 29, 1218–1231 (2017).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Lynch, J. P. Harnessing root architecture to address global challenges. Plant J. 109, 415–431 (2022).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Scharwies, J. D. et al. Moisture-responsive root-branching pathways identified in diverse maize breeding germplasm. Science 387, 666–673 (2025).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Shi, X. et al. Ultra-wideband microwave imaging system for root phenotyping. Sensors 22, 2031 (2022).PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Nagel, K. A. et al. GROWSCREEN-Rhizo is a novel phenotyping robot enabling simultaneous measurements of root and shoot growth for plants grown in soil-filled rhizotrons. Funct. Plant Biol. 39, 891–904 (2012).PubMed Google Scholar Yu, P. et al. Seedling root system adaptation to water availability during maize domestication and global expansion. Nat. Genet. 56, 1245–1256 (2024). This study reveals that reshaping maize root architecture by reducing the seed root number and increasing lateral root density enhances drought resilience.CAS PubMed Google Scholar Huang, X. et al. Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat. Genet. 42, 961–967 (2010).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Wu, X. et al. Using high-throughput multiple optical phenotyping to decipher the genetic architecture of maize drought tolerance. Genome Biol. 22, 185 (2021). This study utilized a HTP system to extract drought tolerance phenotypes in maize and employed genetic methods such as GWAS in the identification of genes controlling drought resistance in maize.CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Al-Tamimi, N. et al. Salinity tolerance loci revealed in rice using high-throughput non-invasive phenotyping. Nat. Commun. 7, 13342 (2016). This work uses HTP and GWAS to study salt tolerance in rice, thereby gaining a deeper understanding of the early response of rice to salinity.PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Gao, J. et al. Deciphering genetic basis of developmental and agronomic traits by integrating high-throughput optical phenotyping and genome-wide association studies in wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 21, 1966–1977 (2023).PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Li, B. et al. Phenomics-based GWAS analysis reveals the genetic architecture for drought resistance in cotton. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 2533–2544 (2020).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Morton, M. et al. Deciphering salt stress responses in Solanum pimpinellifolium through high-throughput phenotyping. Plant J. 119, 2514–2537 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Wang, W. et al. Integration of high-throughput phenotyping, GWAS, and predictive models reveals the genetic architecture of plant height in maize. Mol. Plant 16, 354–373 (2023).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Crain, J. et al. Combining high-throughput phenotyping and genomic information to increase prediction and selection accuracy in wheat breeding. Plant Genome 11, 170043 (2018).Google Scholar Lane, H. M. et al. Phenomic selection and prediction of maize grain yield from near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy of kernels. Plant Phenome J. 3, e20002 (2020).Google Scholar Tross, M. C. et al. Data driven discovery and quantification of hyperspectral leaf reflectance phenotypes across a maize diversity panel. Plant Phenome J. 7, e20106 (2024).Google Scholar Rincent, R. et al. Phenomic selection is a low-cost and high-throughput method based on indirect predictions: proof of concept on wheat and poplar. G3 8, 3961–3972 (2018).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Gibbs, J. A. et al. Active vision and surface reconstruction for 3D plant shoot modelling. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinformatics 17, 1907–1917 (2020).Google Scholar Jin, S. et al. Lidar sheds new light on plant phenomics for plant breeding and management: recent advances and future prospects. ISPRS 171, 202–223 (2021).Google Scholar Wagner, R. et al. Imagine all the plants: evaluation of a light-field camera for on-site crop growth monitoring. Remote Sens. 8, 823 (2016).Google Scholar Chang, J. et al. EI-MVSNet: epipolar-guided multi-view stereo network with interval-aware label. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 33, 753–766 (2024).PubMed Google Scholar Gu, Y. et al. Novel 3D photosynthetic traits derived from the fusion of UAV LiDAR point cloud and multispectral imagery in wheat. Remote Sens. Environ. 311, 114244 (2024).Google Scholar Zhang, Y. et al. Dissecting the phenotypic components and genetic architecture of maize stem vascular bundles using high-throughput phenotypic analysis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 19, 35–50 (2021).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Zhang, Y. et al. Plant microphenotype: from innovative imaging to computational analysis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 22, 802–818 (2024).PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Liu, Z. et al. Sustained deep-tissue voltage recording using a fast indicator evolved for two-photon microscopy. Cell 185, 3408–3425 (2022).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Ovečka, M. et al. Multiscale imaging of plant development by light-sheet fluorescence microscopy. Nat. Plants 4, 639–650 (2018). This work shows that light-sheet fluorescence microscopy methods collectively represent a major breakthrough in the development of bio-imaging of living multicellular organisms.PubMed Google Scholar Payne, W. Z. & Kurouski, D. Raman spectroscopy enables phenotyping and assessment of nutrition values of plants: a review. Plant Methods 17, 78 (2021).PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Gonçalves, M. T. V. et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy outperforms genomics for predicting sugarcane feedstock quality traits. PLoS ONE 16, e0236853 (2021).PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Sineshchekov, V. A. Applications of fluorescence spectroscopy in the investigation of plant phytochrome invivo. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 208, 108434 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Barnes, M. et al. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy as a non-destructive method for analysing herbarium specimens. Biol. Lett. 19, 20220546 (2023).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Hacisalihoglu, G. & Armstrong, P. Crop seed phenomics: focus on non-destructive functional trait phenotyping methods and applications. Plants 12, 1177 (2023).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Kou, T. et al. Terahertz spectroscopy for accurate identification of Panax quinquefolium basing on nonconjugated 24(R)-pseudoginsenoside F11. Plant Phenomics 2021, 6793457 (2021).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Horn, P. J. & Chapman, K. D. Imaging plant metabolism in situ. J. Exp. Bot. 75, 1654–1670 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Song, P. et al. High-throughput phenotyping: breaking through the bottleneck in future crop breeding. Crop J. 9, 633–645 (2021).Google Scholar Wen, W. et al. Standard framework construction of technology and equipment for big data in crop phenomics. Engineering 42, 175–184 (2024).Google Scholar Teng, Z. et al. Panicle-Cloud: an open and AI-powered cloud computing platform for quantifying rice panicles from drone-collected imagery to enable the classification of yield production in rice. Plant Phenomics 5, 0105 (2023).PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Wei, X. et al. A quantitative genomics map of rice provides genetic insights and guides breeding. Nat. Genet. 53, 243–253 (2021).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Zhang, J. et al. Engineering rice genomes towards green super rice. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 82, 102664 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Moor, M. et al. Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence. Nature 616, 259–265 (2023).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Zhang, K. et al. A generalist vision–language foundation model for diverse biomedical tasks. Nat. Med. 30, 3129–3141 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Zhu, W. et al. The CropGPT project: call for a global, coordinated effort in precision design breeding driven by AI using biological big data. Mol. Plant 17, 215–218 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Sharma, S. et al. DeepG2P: fusing multi-modal data to improve crop production. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.05986 (2022).Wang, H. et al. Horizontal gene transfer of Fhb7 from fungus underlies Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Science 368, eaba5435 (2020).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Zhang, C. et al. High-resolution satellite imagery applications in crop phenotyping: an overview. Comput. Electron. Agric. 175, 105584 (2020).Google Scholar Jiang, Z. et al. Combining UAV-RGB high-throughput field phenotyping and genome-wide association study to reveal genetic variation of rice germplasms in dynamic response to drought stress. New Phytol. 232, 440–455 (2021).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Lu, S. et al. Natural variation at the soybean J locus improves adaptation to the tropics and enhances yield. Nat. Genet. 49, 773–779 (2017).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Qi, X. et al. Genome editing enables next-generation hybrid seed production technology. Mol. Plant 13, 1262–1269 (2020).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Wang, J. et al. A single transcription factor promotes both yield and immunity in rice. Science 361, 1026–1028 (2018).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Xu, K. et al. Sub1A is an ethylene-response-factor-like gene that confers submergence tolerance to rice. Nature 442, 705–708 (2006).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Ristaino, J. B. et al. The persistent threat of emerging plant disease pandemics to global food security. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2022239118 (2021).CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Xia, K. et al. The single-cell stereo-seq reveals region-specific cell subtypes and transcriptome profiling in Arabidopsis leaves. Dev. Cell 57, 1299–1310 (2022).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Sun, G. et al. The maize single-nucleus transcriptome comprehensively describes signaling networks governing movement and development of grass stomata. Plant Cell 34, 1890–1911 (2022).PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Ye, H. et al. A novel in vivo genome editing doubled haploid system for Zea mays L. Nat. Plants 10, 1493–1501 (2024).CAS PubMed Google Scholar Watson, A. et al. Speed breeding is a powerful tool to accelerate crop research and breeding. Nat. Plants 4, 23–29 (2018).PubMed Google Scholar