Some time ago, people noticed that buried in the Windows Bluetooth drivers is the hard-coded name of the Microsoft Wireless Notebook Presenter Mouse 8000. What's going on there? Does the Microsoft Wireless Notebook Presenter Mouse 8000 receive favorable treatment from the Microsoft Bluetooth drivers? Is this some sort of collusion?No, it's not that.There is a lot of a bad hardware out there, and there are a lot of compatibility hacks to deal with it. You have CD-ROM controller cards that report the same drive four times or USB devices that draw more than 500mW of power after promising they wouldn't. More generally, you have devices whose descriptors are syntactically invalid or contain values that are outside of legal range or which are simply nonsensical.Most of the time, the code to compensate for these types of errors doesn't betray its presence in the form of hard-coded strings. Instead, you have "else" branches that secretly repair or ignore corrupted values.Unfortunately, the type of mistake that the Microsoft Wireless Notebook Presenter Mouse 8000 made is one that is easily exposed via strings, because they messed up their string!The device local name string is specified to be encoded in UTF-8. However, the Microsoft Wireless Notebook Presenter Mouse 8000 reports its name as Microsoft⟪AE⟫ Wireless Notebook Presenter Mouse 8000, encoding the registered trademark symbol ® not as UTF-8 as required by the specification but in code page 1252. What's even worse is that a bare ⟪AE⟫ is not a legal UTF-8 sequence, so the string wouldn't even show up as corrupted; it would get rejected as invalid.Thanks, Legal Department, for sticking a ® in the descriptor and messing up the whole thing.There is a special table inside the Bluetooth drivers of "Devices that report their names wrong (and the correct name to use)". If the Bluetooth stack sees one of these devices, and it presents the wrong name, then the correct name is substituted.That table currently has only one entry.