The top EU diplomat’s “surprise” at the role of the Soviets and the Chinese in WWII reveals the ugly incompetence of Western elites Kaja Kallas, the European Union’s de facto foreign minister (and former prime minister of Estonia), is unusually, grotesquely incompetent, even for an unelected EU apparatchik.Like former German Foreign Minister Annalena “360 Degrees” Baerbock – now instagraming like an excited upper-class teenager from her ill-begotten UN sinecure in New York – Kallas also displays an enormous capacity for being pleased with herself. She appears never happier than when holding a mic to her own platitudes, presented in a mortifyingly basic form of very labored English, while being obsequiously soft-balled by a fawning interviewer.In both cases, the contrast between the self-image and reality is jarring: Kallas and Baerbock’s obvious, glaring lack of intellectual ability, elementary education, and basic professional know-how should have ended their misguided career ambitions long ago.Yet, instead, Kallas, like Baerbock, has not only rapidly fallen up the slippery ladder of career and privilege. She has done so in a particularly visible area. High officials responsible for the economy, for instance, can do – and do – enormous damage. But those in charge of foreign policy are no less dangerous, while, literally, publicly representing tens or hundreds of millions of people.A professional and intelligent foreign minister – such as, for instance, China’s Wang Yi, India’s S. Jaishankar, or Russia’s Sergey Lavrov – can enhance respect for a country or bloc even among its critics or opponents. However, an amateurish and dim top diplomat becomes a disgrace to be ashamed of before the world, even among embarrassed friends. They’re perhaps worse: a laughingstock, signaling that whoever chooses to be represented by a fool must be foolish as well. Read more EU’s Kallas ‘critically uneducated’ – Moscow With Kaja Kallas’s tenure as the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, both cringe and ridicule are abundant. Her recent peak performances have included a truly inane take on the history of the Second World War, silly and rather racist musings on the general abilities of “the Russians” and “the Chinese,” and, of course, a preposterous attempt to blame them – plus Iran and North Korea – for disrupting our brave old world of a rules-bound order that includes the Gaza genocide, compliments of Israel and the West.Regarding what Kallas mistakes for history, the high-flyer from Estonia has opined that she was surprised by claims that Russia and China fought together in and won World War II. Of course, that’s simply a fact: Both countries were and are widely recognized as prominent members of the alliance that defeated global fascism in Europe and Asia.Indeed, if Kallas were capable of telling an intern to Google the matter or consult the online version of the Encyclopedia Britannica, she’d find out quickly that China and Russia (then the core of the Soviet Union) are counted among the “Big Four” core of the alliance (alongside Great Britain and the US). This place was earned with rivers of blood: China and the Soviet Union were the two most brutally devastated countries in World War Two. China fought massive Japanese forces, and Russia broke the spine of Nazi Germany’s Wehrmacht. Even busy Estonian collaborators could not save the day for the Führer.Kallas, put differently, went public with her astonishment about water being wet and our planet a sphere.In light of this historical (and, in a sad way, historic, too) imbecility it is intriguing to find that only last year Kallas spoke at the same Estonian conference as historian Tim Snyder. But then again, maybe it’s not, considering Snyder’s sorry descent into reliably Russophobic and compulsively Cold War re-enacting demagoguery. It also was the same meeting, of course, where Kallas glibly chattered away about breaking up Russia. Who knows? Maybe her friend Tim was nodding along encouragingly in the audience.Regarding the various aptitudes of “the Russians” and “the Chinese” in “technology” and “social sciences,” it was hard to tell about what provincial stereotypes exactly Kallas was trying to ramble on. Except that, somehow, in her head they add up to a fiendish ability to make “big, big fires” in NATO-EU Europe. By which rather badaboom-ish expression, she clearly means that the big bad Russians and Chinese incite the otherwise famously happy and content masses of Europe. Yellow Vests, farmers’ rebellions, the new right surging in, at least, the UK, France, and Germany? Blame the outside agitators! Read more China accuses EU’s Kallas of ‘stoking confrontation’ And then, there’s the global angle, obviously. A mind as capacious as Kallas’s must think big: There it turns out that it is not over three post-Cold War decades of arrogant and very violent Western unilateralism (served with or without “value” babble), regime change operations by war and subversion, economic warfare (by now also fratricidal), and, last but not least, outright genocide, as now in Gaza, that have discredited the West’s idea of international “order.” It is all the fault of those who dare resist this abomination masquerading as based on “rules,” namely, in this case, China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia.Kallas is one of those public figures where it’s hard to believe they hear themselves talk, so deranged, out-of-place, and absurd is their output. But she clearly does, and she even loves it. The explanation for that is actually simple: We are obviously dealing with, in political terms, a ruthless opportunist and careerist; in intellectual terms, a bigoted ideologue; and, in psychological terms, a raging narcissist.What is harder to answer is a much more important question: How is it possible that among almost 450 million EU citizens, it is Kaja Kallas who was selected to represent them all, atrociously, embarrassingly, shamefully? In a superficial, if still important, sense, such madness is the result of the EU not being the democratic “garden” its apparatchiks love to fantasize about but a regime of bureaucratic authoritarianism.Citizens do not matter, self-empowered and self-selecting “elites” decide. Everything. In this case, what “qualifies” ditto Kallas is her fanatical Russophobia as well as provincial Sinophobia and the reliable simplicity and rigidity of her half-baked third-hand views.In a deeper sense that is even more important, however, the rise and persistence of such a devastating, sadly comical incompetent speak to something else, of course: the profound, pervasive, social and cultural decadence of EU-NATO Europe. As long as Europeans – whether at the EU or national level – are represented by the likes of Kallas, Baerbock, or – for that matter – von der Leyen, Macron, Starmer, or Merz, they will not stop Europe’s rapid decline.