NBIS (1D) – Structural recovery after correction and trend reactNebius Group N.V.BATS:NBISEdoLab-MarketsOn the daily chart of Nebius (NBIS), a clear structural correction can be observed after the previous highs around the 141 area, followed by a stabilization phase and a gradual attempt at bullish reactivation. After the last significant high, price entered a corrective phase dominated by selling pressure. During this period, bullish continuity was lost, upside attempts lacked follow-through, and the overall context did not favor directional participation. From an Edo Control perspective, this phase was characterized by weak sequences, the absence of meaningful bullish hitmarks, and a heatmap reflecting progressive exhaustion of the prior move. As the correction matured, internal price behavior began to shift. Downside extensions became less effective, overlapping sequences appeared, and the market stopped behaving as clearly bearish. Within the indicator, this transition was reflected by the loss of clean bearish continuation patterns and the emergence of transition candles, suggesting absorption of supply rather than renewed selling pressure. The key element was not an abrupt reversal, but the moment when price stopped declining with intent. From there, change-related hitmarks began to appear and contextual coherence improved, indicating that price was building a base from which it could re-engage with the broader trend. The heatmap supported this process, moving from exhaustion toward stabilization and gradual contextual improvement. At present, the daily structure points to a constructive recovery phase. Price is no longer behaving as corrective and is starting to develop a more consistent directional sequence. This should be understood as a structural reordering process rather than a short-lived technical bounce. From an operational standpoint, the approach is to trade in favor of the dominant movement. The objective is not to anticipate forced reversals, but to identify when a corrective phase loses effectiveness and the trend begins to reactivate, allowing participation with the prevailing directional bias. This philosophy prioritizes structural coherence over precise timing. In this context, I have taken a position in two tranches, with entries at 100 and 98. This is not a short-term trade or a defined swing setup. The intent is long-term participation, allowing price to develop its structure over time without a fixed horizon. The 140–145 zone represents a conservative objective, as it aligns with prior highs and a major structural resistance area. Reaching this zone would validate the current recovery phase. Beyond that level, price behavior becomes critical. For the bullish scenario to extend, a breakout above prior highs should occur with structure and volume, signaling acceptance at higher prices. Under such conditions, extensions toward the 150–160 area would be a natural development, and in a favorable long-term context, higher levels cannot be ruled out. Conversely, failure to break prior highs or the formation of a lower high in that zone would raise the risk of a double top. In such a scenario, the context would no longer be constructive and reassessing or closing the position would be justified. The focus remains on managing the position based on structure, volume, and price behavior at key levels, rather than on fixed expectations. More information and context: https://www.edolab.io