Oyeoka, H. C., Ewulonu, C. M., Nwuzor, I. C., Obele, C. M. & Nwabanne, J. T. Packaging and degradability properties of polyvinyl alcohol/gelatin nanocomposite films filled water hyacinth cellulose nanocrystals. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 6, 168–185 (2021).Google Scholar Wang, J., Euring, M., Ostendorf, K. & Zhang, K. Biobased materials for food packaging. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 7, 1–13 (2022).Google Scholar Sha, X.-M. et al. In vitro gastrointestinal digestion of thermally reversible and irreversible fish gelatin induced by microbial transglutaminase. Food Hydrocoll. 145, 109079 (2023).Google Scholar Karim, A. A. & Bhat, R. Gelatin alternatives for the food industry: recent developments, challenges and prospects. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 19, 644–656 (2008).Google Scholar Karim, A. A. & Bhat, R. Fish gelatin: properties, challenges, and prospects as an alternative to mammalian gelatins. Food Hydrocoll. 23, 563–576 (2009).Google Scholar Regenstein, J. M., Chaudry, M. M. & Regenstein, C. E. An introduction to kosher and halal food laws. Guide US Food Laws Regul. 12, 171–212 (2013).Google Scholar Yang, H. et al. Repurposing fish waste into gelatin as a potential alternative for mammalian sources: a review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 21, 942–963 (2022).Google Scholar Demircan, H., Oral, R. A., Toker, O. S. & Palabiyik, I. Investigation of the effects of phenolic extracts obtained from agro-Industrial food wastes on gelatin modification. ACS Omega 9, 20263–20276 (2024).Google Scholar Biswas, S. & Rashid, T. U. Effect of ultrasound on the physical properties and processing of major biopolymers—a review. Soft Matter 18, 8367–8383 (2022).Google Scholar Zhang, T. et al. Gelatins as emulsifiers for oil-in-water emulsions: extraction, chemical composition, molecular structure, and molecular modification. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 106, 113–131 (2020).Google Scholar Xu, J. et al. Effect of transglutaminase crosslinking on the structural, physicochemical, functional, and emulsion stabilization properties of three types of gelatins. LWT 163, 113543 (2022).Google Scholar Salazar-Montoya, J., Jimenez-Avalos, H. & Ramos-Ramirez, E. Effects of gum arabic concentration and soy proteins on the flow and viscoelasticity of their dispersion. Int. J. Food Prop. 15, 891–902 (2012).Google Scholar Makri, E. A. & Doxastakis, G. I. Surface tension of Phaseolus vulgaris and coccineus proteins and effect of polysaccharides on their foaming properties. Food Chem. 101, 37–48 (2007).Google Scholar Herman, R. et al. Protein hydrolysates from silkworm (Bombyx mori) pupae protein treated with a novel neutral protease. J. Insects Food Feed 8, 295–311 (2022).Google Scholar Khiari, Z., Rico, D., Martin-Diana, A. B. & Barry-Ryan, C. Comparison between gelatines extracted from mackerel and blue whiting bones after different pre-treatments. Food Chem. 139, 347–354 (2013).Google Scholar Zi, Y. et al. Effects of octenyl succinic anhydride chemical modification and surfactant physical modification of bovine bone gelatin on the stabilization of fish oil-loaded emulsions. Food Chem. -X 16, 100517 (2022).Stevenson, M. et al. Development and characterization of ribose-crosslinked gelatin products prepared by indirect 3D printing. Food Hydrocoll. 96, 65–71 (2019).Google Scholar Lyu, S. et al. Foaming properties of egg white proteins improved by enzymatic hydrolysis: The changes in structure and physicochemical properties. Food Hydrocoll. 141, 108681 (2023).Google Scholar Venkatachalam, K. & Nagarajan, M. Assessment of different proteases on degree of hydrolysis, functional properties and radical scavenging activities of salted duck egg white hydrolysate. J. Food Sci. Technol. 56, 3137–3144 (2019).Google Scholar Moosavi-Nasab, M., Yazdani-Dehnavi, M. & Mirzapour-Kouhdasht, A. The effects of enzymatically aided acid-swelling process on gelatin extracted from fish by-products. Food Sci. Nutr. 8, 5017–5025 (2020).Google Scholar Renard, D., Lavenant-Gourgeon, L., Lapp, A., Nigen, M. & Sanchez, C. Enzymatic hydrolysis studies of arabinogalactan-protein structure from Acacia gum: The self-similarity hypothesis of assembly from a common building block. Carbohydr. Polym. 112, 648–661 (2014).Google Scholar Zhao, H. et al. Glycosylation fish gelatin with gum Arabic: functional and structural properties. LWT 139, 110634 (2021).Google Scholar Liu, J. et al. Physico-chemical and functional properties of silver carp myosin glycated with konjac oligo-glucomannan: effects of deacetylation. Food Chem. 291, 223–230 (2019).Google Scholar Li, H., Nigen, M., Sanchez, C. & Renard, D. Enzymatic hydrolysis alters the structure and surface properties of Acacia senegal Gum. Food Hydrocoll. 167, 111402 (2025).Google Scholar Abu-Ghoush, M., Samhouri, M., Yaseen, E. & Herald, T. Fuzzy cluster modeling and evaluation of surface interaction and emulsion of selected wheat protein combined with IOTA-carrageenan and gum arabic solutions. J. Food Process Eng. 33, 131–149 (2010).Google Scholar Xiong, W., Li, J., Li, B. & Wang, L. Physicochemical properties and interfacial dilatational rheological behavior at air-water interface of high intensity ultrasound modified ovalbumin: effect of ionic strength. Food Hydrocoll. 97, 105210 (2019).Google Scholar Sun, P., Bhattacharjee, N., Einkauf, J. D. & Doughty, B. Bulk anion recognition kinetically holds back interfacial adsorption. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 16, 2128–2135 (2025).Google Scholar Jin, H. et al. Competitive adsorption of binary negatively charged proteins in egg white during foam evolution: from bulk solution to air-water interface. Food Hydrocoll. 140, 108680 (2023).Google Scholar Niu, F. et al. Ovalbumin/gum arabic-stabilized emulsion: rheology, emulsion characteristics, and Raman spectroscopic study. Food Hydrocoll. 52, 607–614 (2016).Google Scholar Sukarno, A., Budijanto, S. & Sitanggang, A. B. Enzymatic hydrolysis of marine fish gelatin for producing ACE inhibitory peptides: meta-analysis. Ann. Univ. Dunarea De. Jos Galati, Fascicle VI-Food Technol. 46, 188–206 (2022).Google Scholar Jiang, L. Preparation of fish-scale gelatins by mild hydrolysis and their characterization. J. Polym. Environ. 21, 564–567 (2013).Google Scholar Derkach, S. R., Kolotova, D. S., Kuchina, Y. A. & Shumskaya, N. V. Characterization of fish gelatin obtained from Atlantic cod skin using enzymatic treatment. Polymers 14, 751 (2022).Zhang, Y., Duan, X. & Zhuang, Y. Purification and characterization of novel antioxidant peptides from enzymatic hydrolysates of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) skin gelatin. Peptides 38, 13–21 (2012).Google Scholar Asghar, A., Anjum, F. M., Butt, M. S. & Hussain, S. Shelf life and stability study of frozen dough bread by the use of different hydrophillic gums. Int. J. Food Eng. 2, 1040 (2006).Huang, T. et al. Rheological behavior, emulsifying properties and structural characterization of phosphorylated fish gelatin. Food Chem. 246, 428–436 (2018).Google Scholar Huang, T. et al. Glycosylated fish gelatin emulsion: Rheological, tribological properties and its application as model coffee creamers. Food Hydrocoll. 102, 105552 (2020).Google Scholar Marcotte, M., Hoshahili, A. R. T. & Ramaswamy, H. S. Rheological properties of selected hydrocolloids as a function of concentration and temperature. Food Res. Int. 34, 695–703 (2001).Google Scholar Hu, Z.-Z. et al. Microbial transglutaminase (MTGase) modified fish gelatin-γ-polyglutamic acid (γ-PGA): rheological behavior, gelling properties, and structure. Food Chem. 348, 129093 (2021).Google Scholar Ding, K. et al. Ultrasonic-assisted glycosylation with κ-carrageenan on the functional and structural properties of fish gelatin. J. Sci. Food Agric. 103, 5322–5331 (2023).Google Scholar León-López, A., Fuentes-Jiménez, L., Hernández-Fuentes, A. D., Campos-Montiel, R. G. & Aguirre-Álvarez, G. Hydrolysed collagen from sheepskins as a source of functional peptides with antioxidant activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 3931 (2019).Sabet, S. et al. The interactions between the two negatively charged polysaccharides: gum Arabic and alginate. Food Hydrocoll. 112, 106343 (2021).Google Scholar Huang, S. et al. Pectin stabilized fish gelatin emulsions: physical stability, rheological, and interaction properties. Front. Nutr. 9, 961875 (2022).Anvari, M., Pan, C.-H., Yoon, W.-B. & Chung, D. Characterization of fish gelatin–gum arabic complex coacervates as influenced by phase separation temperature. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 79, 894–902 (2015).Google Scholar Elavarasan, K. et al. Extraction and characterization of gelatin from the head waste of tiger tooth croaker (Otolithes ruber). Waste Biomass Valoriz. 8, 851–858 (2017).Google Scholar Duan, Y. et al. Bovine liver hydrolysates based on six proteases: physicochemical properties, emulsification characteristics, antioxidant capacity assessment, and peptide identification. LWT 208, 116718 (2024).Google Scholar Gao, Y., Chen, L., Chi, H., Li, L. & Teng, F. Insights into the soybean protein isolate hydrolysates: performance characterization, emulsion construction and in vitro digestive behavior. Int. J. Biomacromol. 279, 149414 (2024).Yang, Y., Anvari, M., Pan, C.-H. & Chung, D. Characterisation of interactions between fish gelatin and gum arabic in aqueous solutions. Food Chem. 135, 555–561 (2012).Google Scholar Benichou, A., Aserin, A., Lutz, R. & Garti, N. Formation and characterization of amphiphilic conjugates of whey protein isolate (WPI)/xanthan to improve surface activity. Food Hydrocoll. 21, 379–391 (2007).Google Scholar Binsi, P. et al. Gelation and thermal characteristics of microwave extracted fish gelatin–natural gum composite gels. J. Food Sci. Technol. 54, 518–530 (2017).Google Scholar Park, J., Sung, J. M., Choi, Y.-S. & Park, J.-D. pH-dependent pasting and texture properties of rice flour subjected to limited protein hydrolysis. Food Hydrocoll. 117, 106754 (2021).Google Scholar Lin, L.-H. & Chen, K.-M. Preparation and surface activity of modified soy protein. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 102, 3498–3503 (2006).Google Scholar Loveday, S. M., Ye, A., Anema, S. G. & Singh, H. Tuning heat-induced colloidal aggregation of whey proteins, sodium caseinate and gum arabic: effect of protein composition, preheating and gum arabic level. Food Res. Int. 62, 128–136 (2014).Google Scholar Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Li, Z., Li, Y. & Qi, B. Effects of polysaccharide type on the structure, interface behavior, and foam properties of soybean protein isolate hydrolysate-polysaccharide Maillard conjugates. Food Hydrocoll. 151, 109801 (2024).Mad-Ali, S., Benjakul, S., Prodpran, T. & Maqsood, S. Interfacial properties of gelatin from goat skin as influenced by drying methods. LWT 73, 102–107 (2016).Google Scholar Liu, J., Xu, G., Yuan, S. & Jiang, P. The effect of macromolecules on foam stability in sodium dodecyl sulfate/cetylpyridinium bromide mixtures. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 24, 779–787 (2003).Google Scholar Ding, Q. et al. Effect of ultrasonic treatment on the structure and functional properties of mantle proteins from scallops (Patinopecten yessoensis). Ultrason. Sonochem. 79, 105770 (2021).Google Scholar Wang, R., Wang, Y., Guo, W. & Zeng, M. Stability and bioactivity of carotenoids from Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 in Zein/NaCas/Gum Arabic composite nanoparticles fabricated by pH adjustment and heat treatment antisolvent precipitation. Food Hydrocoll. 117, 106663 (2021).Google Scholar Santos, dos, F. R. et al. Improvement of the production of pequi almond (Caryocar brasiliense Camb.) protein hydrolysates through ultrasound-assisted enzymolysis: Impact on hydrolysis kinetics, structure and functional properties of hydrolysates. Process Biochem. 147, 381–390 (2024).Google Scholar Li, Y., Zhang, X., Zhao, Y., Ding, J. & Lin, S. Investigation on complex coacervation between fish skin gelatin from cold-water fish and gum arabic: Phase behavior, thermodynamic, and structural properties. Food Res. Int. 107, 596–604 (2018).Google Scholar Shi, C. et al. Polymorphism and stability of nanostructures of three types of collagens from bovine flexor tendon, rat tail, and tilapia skin. Food Hydrocoll. 93, 253–260 (2019).Google Scholar Uriarte-Montoya, M. H. et al. Giant squid skin gelatin: chemical composition and biophysical characterization. Food Res. Int. 44, 3243–3249 (2011).Google Scholar Badii, F. & Howell, N. K. Fish gelatin: structure, gelling properties and interaction with egg albumen proteins. Food Hydrocoll. 20, 630–640 (2006).Google Scholar Van der Plancken, I., Van Loey, A. & Hendrickx, M. E. Foaming properties of egg white proteins affected by heat or high pressure treatment. J. Food Eng. 78, 1410–1426 (2007).Google Scholar Rousi, Z., Malhiac, C., Fatouros, D. G. & Paraskevopoulou, A. Complex coacervates formation between gelatin and gum Arabic with different arabinogalactan protein fraction content and their characterization. Food Hydrocoll. 96, 577–588 (2019).Google Scholar Gaspar-Pintiliescu, A. et al. Physicochemical and biological properties of gelatin extracted from marine snail Rapana venosa. Mar. Drugs 17, 589 (2019).Pranoto, Y., Lee, C. M. & Park, H. J. Characterizations of fish gelatin films added with gellan and κ-carrageenan. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 40, 766–774 (2007).Google Scholar Denkov, N., Tcholakova, S. & Politova-Brinkova, N. Physicochemical control of foam properties. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 50, 101376 (2020).Google Scholar Kaynarca, G. B. et al. Gelatins derived from aronia-supplemented fish diets: structural effect and molecular simulation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 295, 139623 (2025).Google Scholar Lechevalier, V. et al. Ovalbumin, ovotransferrin, lysozyme: three model proteins for structural modifications at the air−water interface. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51, 6354–6361 (2003).Google Scholar Zheng, Y., Chang, Y., Luo, B., Teng, H. & Chen, L. Molecular structure modification of ovalbumin through controlled glycosylation with dextran for its emulsibility improvement. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 194, 1–8 (2022).Google Scholar Zhang, X. et al. Emulsion stability and dilatational rheological properties of soy/whey protein isolate complexes at the oil-water interface: influence of pH. Food Hydrocoll. 113, 106391 (2021)Binsi, P. K., Shamasundar, B. A., Dileep, A. O., Badii, F. & Howell, N. K. Rheological and functional properties of gelatin from the skin of Bigeye snapper (Priacanthus hamrur) fish: influence of gelatin on the gel-forming ability of fish mince. Food Hydrocoll. 23, 132–145 (2009).Google Scholar Thuy, L. T. M., Thanh, N. V. & Truc, T. T. The changing of gelatin properties from tra catfish skin (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) by alkaline replacement to enzyme in pretreated process. Ciênc. Rural 10, 1590 (2022).Google Scholar Lim, Y.-S. & Yoo, B.-J. Effects of pH, electrolyte concentrations, and alginate molecular weights on surface hydrophobicity of soy protein isolates. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 45, 1285–1292 (2016).Google Scholar Chen, H. et al. The structure, antioxidant activity, and stability of fish gelatin/chitooligosaccharide nanoparticles loaded with apple polyphenols. J. Sci. Food Agric. 103, 4211–4220 (2023).Google Scholar Azarikia, F. & Badameh, R. Utilization of gelatin-tragacanthin complexes for fabrication of oleogels using foam-template method: a study on the effect of CaCl2 addition. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 10, 101066 (2025).Google Scholar Osanlóo, D. T., Mahlin, D., Bjerregaard, S., Bergenståhl, B. & Millqvist-Fureby, A. Exploring vacuum foam drying as an alternative to freeze-drying and spray drying for a human lipase. Int. J. Pharm. 667, 124883 (2024).Google Scholar Liu, Y. et al. Characterization of fish gelatin-Artemisia sphaerocephala Krasch gum films prepared by adding bamboo leaf flavonoids as an active substrate: application in chilled pork preservation. LWT 20, 118367 (2025).Google Scholar Download references