Here’s what the science says about menstrual masking | The IndependentNotifications can be managed in browser preferences.Jump to contentIndependentSwipe for next articleIndependent Bulletin homepageDownload ourSocial PartnerWe are 8 logo (opens in a new tab)AllNewsSportCultureLifestyleThe Conversation Original report by Dipa KamdarWednesday 19 November 2025 12:59 GMTSome menstrual masking advocates liken the practice to the so-called ‘vampire facial’ (Getty)Menstrual masking is a social media beauty trend involving applying menstrual blood to the face, with advocates claiming it offers healing or rejuvenating benefits.Despite claims that period blood contains beneficial stem cells and proteins, there is currently no clinical evidence to support its topical use for skincare.Scientific research, however, indicates that menstrual fluid plasma shows significant potential for wound healing, and menstrual blood-derived stem cells are promising for medical skin regeneration treatments.Experts caution against menstrual masking due to the risk of transferring bacteria, fungi, or sexually transmitted infections from the complex mixture of menstrual fluid, unlike sterile clinical procedures such as 'vampire facials'.While some find the practice empowering, dermatological experts advise against menstrual masking, stressing that its biological potential is for controlled medical research rather than unproven DIY beauty routines.In fullWhat is menstrual masking? The potentially risky new beauty trendThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in