The Coalition Against Antisemitism at Northwestern (CAAN) stated that the lawsuit lacked a “strong legal foundation” and was “an inefficient use of judicial resources.”By Dion J. Pierre, The AlgemeinerA civil lawsuit, which aimed to cancel Northwestern University’s antisemitism prevention course on the apparent grounds that conduct widely acknowledged as antisemitic is integral to Palestinian culture, has been voluntarily withdrawn by both parties.“The plaintiffs and defendants, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby submit the following joint stipulation of voluntary dismissal purgation to federal rule of civil procedure … and hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action in its entirety, without prejudice,” says a court document filed on Dec. 22. “Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.”As previously reported by The Algemeiner, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)—an organization that has been scrutinized by US authorities over alleged ties to the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas—demanded a temporary restraining order to halt the program, which the university mandated as a prerequisite for fall registration, and the rescission of disciplinary measures imposed on nine students who refused to complete it.Filing on behalf of the Northwestern Graduate Workers for Palestine (GW4P) group, CAIR charged that the required training violates Title VI of the US Civil Rights Act of 1964 and serves as a “pretense” for censoring “expressions of Palestinian identity, culture, and advocacy for self-determination.”CAIR particularly took issue with Northwestern’s adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of antisemitism and its application to the training course, which, at its conclusion, calls on students to pledge not to be antisemitic.Used by governments and other entities across the world, the IHRA definition describes antisemitism as a “certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews.Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions, and toward religious facilities.”It provides 11 specific, contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and the religious sphere.Beyond classic antisemitic behavior associated with the likes of the medieval period and Nazi Germany, the examples include denial of the Holocaust and newer forms of antisemitism targeting Israel, such as demonizing the Jewish state, denying its right to exist, and holding it to standards not expected of any other democratic state.The mutual dismissal did not cite a reason for the claim’s withdrawal, but it was Northwestern’s robust policy agenda for combating antisemitism that precipitated CAIR’s scrutiny.The university adopted the IHRA definition of antisemitism in 2025 and began holding the “mandatory antisemitism training” sessions CAIR challenged in its lawsuit.“This included a live training for all new students in September and a 17-minute training module for all enrolled students, produced in collaboration with the Jewish United Fund,” Northwestern said in a report that updated the public on its antisemitism prevention efforts.“Antisemitism trainings will continue as a permanent part of our broader training in civil rights and Title IX.”Other initiatives rolled out by the university include an Advisory Council to the President on Jewish Life, dinners for Jewish students hosted by administrative officials, and educational events that raise awareness of rising antisemitism in the US and around the world.On Tuesday, the Coalition Against Antisemitism at Northwestern (CAAN) told The Algemeiner that the lawsuit lacked a “strong legal foundation” and was “an inefficient use of judicial resources.”It added, “Universities have broad discretion to require training programs designed to address antisemitism and other issues central to campus safety and well-being. While the case was withdrawn prior to a ruling on the merits, we believe the university’s authority in this area is well-established.”In late November, Northwestern University agreed to pay $75 million and abolish a controversial compact, known as the “Deering Meadow Agreement,” it reached with a pro-Hamas student group in exchange for the US federal government’s releasing $790 million in grants it impounded in April over accusations that it was slow to address antisemitism and other policies that allowed reverse discrimination.Part of the “Deering Meadow Agreement,” which ended an anti-Israel encampment, called for establishing a scholarship for Palestinian undergraduates, contacting potential employers of students who caused recent campus disruptions to insist on their being hired, creating a segregated dormitory hall to be occupied exclusively by students of Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) and Muslim descent, and forming a new advisory committee in which anti-Zionist students and faculty may wield an outsized voice.The agreement outraged Jewish civil rights groups and lawmakers and ultimately led to the resignation of former Northwestern University president Michael Schill, who authorized the concessions.“As part of this agreement with the federal government, the university has terminated the Deering Meadow Agreement and will reverse all policies that have been implemented or are being implemented in adherence to it,” the university said in a statement, noting that it also halted plans for the segregated dormitory.“The university remains committed to fostering inclusive spaces and will continue to support student belonging and engagement through existing campus facilities and organizations, while partnering with alumni to explore off-campus, privately owned locations that could further support community connection and programming.”The post Anti-Israel activists drop lawsuit to cancel antisemitism prevention course at Northwestern University appeared first on World Israel News.