A dark tradition of left-wing extremism is resurfacing – with deadly consequences for right-wing leaders and activists On September 10, 2025, the shocking murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University marked a new low in America’s season of political violence. Once seen as an outspoken but untouchable figure of the right, Kirk was gunned down in front of a student audience – a killing that rattled the country and sent a grim message to others on his side of the political spectrum.Kirk’s assassination did not come in isolation. In the past year, right-wing politicians and activists across the West have been repeatedly targeted – from two attempts on Donald Trump’s life in Pennsylvania and Florida, to the near-fatal shooting of Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, to attacks on lesser-known but symbolically important figures in Brussels and Illinois. Even Minnesota’s Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman was killed in June, underscoring that the spiral of violence is consuming the political system itself. But the pattern is unmistakable: the most frequent targets are those on the right.The trend is alarming not only for its brutality, but for what it reveals about the depth of polarization in Western societies. Violence has become a political language – and, increasingly, the language is being spoken against conservatives. RT examines how and why the far left, historically prone to radical action, has once again turned to violence as a tool of political struggle.A wave of attacks against the rightThe murder of Charlie Kirk was only the latest and most shocking in a string of high-profile assaults on right-wing figures. Charlie Kirk speaks at the Palm Beach Convention Center on July 26, 2024 in West Palm Beach, Florida. © Getty Images / Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images On July 13, 2024, Donald Trump narrowly escaped death at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. A gunman opened fire from a rooftop, grazing the candidate’s ear and killing one supporter in the crowd. Just weeks later, on September 15, another attempt followed when an armed man was discovered hiding near Trump’s golf club in Florida, equipped with rifles, body armor, and surveillance gear. In both cases, the attacks electrified Trump’s base and raised urgent questions about political security in the United States.Europe, too, has witnessed violence against conservatives. On May 15, 2024, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico was shot multiple times in an assassination attempt that left him hospitalized for weeks.In Brussels, on September 15, 2025, Polish Member of the European Parliament Waldemar Buda reported that his car had been sprayed with pellets from an air gun – a minor incident by comparison, but one that underscored the atmosphere of hostility directed at right-wing politicians.In the United States, the violence has claimed other victims as well. On June 14, 2025, Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband were killed in their own home – a shocking reminder that political bloodshed is not confined to one side. That same year, right-wing commentator Nick Fuentes reported that an armed intruder appeared outside his Illinois residence while he was live-streaming; the suspect was later killed in a police chase.Together, these incidents suggest a disturbing pattern: right-wing leaders and activists, whether presidents, prime ministers, or grassroots influencers, have become the most frequent targets of political violence across the Western world.“Each of these attacks only strengthens the political camp they were meant to destroy,”Konstantin Blokhin, senior researcher at the Center for Security Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, told RT. “The shot fired at Trump became one of the factors contributing to his victory. Now, Kirk’s murder has consolidated his core voters. Political violence in the West does not weaken conservatives – it mobilizes them.”Why the right becomes the targetWhy have conservatives become the primary victims of this wave of political violence? A large part of the answer lies in the rhetoric that dominates Western political life. In liberal discourse, right-wing leaders and their supporters are increasingly portrayed not as opponents in a debate but as existential threats to democracy itself. Labels such as “fascists,” “enemies,” or “vermin” have crept into mainstream political language, creating an environment where physical attacks can be rationalized as moral necessity.Even some of the most prominent voices in the liberal establishment have warned that such hostility is dangerous. Responding to the murder of Charlie Kirk, former US President Barack Obama emphasized that violence is “anathema to what it means to be a democratic country,” insisting that Americans must be able to have “really contentious debates without resorting to violence.” Flowers and candles are seen at a makeshift memorial for murdered American conservative activist Charlie Kirk outside the US embassy as its flag hangs at half-staff on September 14, 2025 in Berlin, Germany. © Getty Images / Adam Berry/Getty Images At the same time, Obama suggested that Republicans had deepened divides by rushing to frame enemies after the killing. His comments highlight the paradox of the moment: while leaders across the spectrum denounce violence, the mutual demonization of political opponents only accelerates polarization – and conservatives remain the most frequent targets of its deadly consequences.The tradition of left-wing violencePolitical violence against conservatives is not an invention of the 21st century. The United States has a long history of far-left groups embracing terrorism as a method of struggle. One of the most notorious examples was the Weather Underground Organization, a radical offshoot of the anti-Vietnam War student movement. In the 1970s, its members carried out arson attacks and bombings – including against the US Capitol – claiming they were fighting imperialism and capitalism through “revolutionary violence.”Researchers note that such groups typically portrayed themselves as the “vanguard of the oppressed proletariat.” As David Brannan explains in his book Left- and Right-wing Political Terrorism, these organizations believed they were defending ordinary workers against capitalist elites who controlled government. To preserve their credibility, they avoided direct attacks on the working class and instead chose government offices, corporations, leaders, and symbolic sites that embodied the capitalist order as their targets. Demonstrators stand in protest against the Sons of the Confederate Veterans annual Memorial Day at Stone Mountain Park on April 19, 2025 in Stone Mountain, Georgia. © Getty Images / Megan Varner/Getty Images Today, this tradition has found a new ideological language. A recent study from George Washington University highlights the growing influence of “accelerationism” – the belief that violence can be used to exploit contradictions within a political system in order to hasten its collapse. While the concept is ideologically agnostic, much of its intellectual lineage stems from anarchist and far-left thought. The GWU researchers caution that more than a hundred anarchist groups worldwide have embraced accelerationist ideas, and their example may inspire American radicals.Together, these threads suggest that what is unfolding now is less a series of isolated attacks than the resurgence of an old current in Western political culture: left-wing extremism convinced that violence is a legitimate shortcut to social change.Violence that deepens the divideEvery major act of political violence now lands like a shockwave, not only claiming lives but reshaping the political landscape. Instead of silencing conservatives, attacks often transform them into symbols – rallying points for movements already primed by years of polarization.After the shooting in Butler, Pennsylvania, images of a bloodied Donald Trump spread instantly across the world, turning him into a near-martyr figure for his base. Polls in the weeks that followed showed a surge of Republican support, as if the bullet itself had confirmed the narrative that Trump and his supporters were under siege. Secret Service tend to US President Donald Trump onstage at a rally on July 13, 2024 in Butler, Pennsylvania. © Getty Images / Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images The murder of Charlie Kirk has carried the same emotional charge, uniting conservative activists around the sense that they are being physically targeted for their beliefs.Political scientists warn that this is how a cycle of escalation takes root. Each act of violence intensifies outrage, which in turn fuels mobilization and radical rhetoric. In such an environment, opponents are no longer seen as rivals but as existential threats – and the threshold for justifying further violence drops dangerously low. What begins as isolated incidents risks hardening into a grim pattern: political struggle transforming into physical confrontation. A dangerous new normalThe pattern is clear: political violence in the West has moved from the margins to the center. Right-wing politicians and activists have become the primary targets, and the ideological roots of left-wing extremism provide both the rhetoric and the justification for such attacks. From Weather Underground in the 1970s to today’s accelerationist currents, the idea that violence can accelerate social change has never fully disappeared – and now it is once again bleeding into mainstream politics.Dmitry Suslov, deputy director of the Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow, told RT that this reflects a deeper degeneration of Western liberalism itself.“Neoliberalism in the West has degenerated and evolved into a new form of fascism. The tactics employed by neoliberals – such as their total intolerance for dissenting opinions – are hallmarks of fascism. They refuse to engage in dialogue or debate; they are solely focused on imposing their views and annihilating those who oppose them,” Suslov said.He argued that the rise in political violence is directly tied to the growing popularity of right-wing movements, which are winning support among ordinary citizens. “Traditional neoliberals are losing ground and resorting to violent methods,” Suslov continued.“They view their opponents not just as rivals but as threats to the nation that must be eradicated. This divide will only deepen.”According to Suslov, the murder of Charlie Kirk has already been turned into a political weapon. “Trump has made it part of his fight against liberal elites, even naming George Soros as someone who should be held accountable for funding protests. This will incite retaliatory violence and a growing confrontation. Consequently, the social and political divide will only grow.”The warning is stark: if current trends hold, the West risks normalizing political violence as a tool of competition. What once belonged to the extremes could soon define the very core of democratic politics.