Why Is Gold Falling? XAU/USD Price Is Going Down for the 9th Session as Gold Price Predictions Remain Bearish

Wait 5 sec.

When I analyzedgold's technical chart last week, I identified $4,550 and $4,360 as the nextdownside targets and the 200-day EMA at $4,200 as the critical bull/beardividing line. I did not expect those targets to be tested within days. Gold hasnow fallen for nine consecutive sessions , losingapproximately 15% from March's $5,100 highs and touching aslow as $4,100 per ounce during Monday's intraday sessionbefore rebounding to $4,260 as the 200 EMA provided initial support. Silver hassimultaneously collapsed to $64 per ounce, its lowest level sinceDecember 2025.In thisarticle, I will break down my updated XAU/USD technical analysis for both goldand silver, examine why the crash is happening, and present the most relevantprice predictions for the rest of 2026. Based on my over a 15 years ofexperience as an analyst and retail investor, here is what I am watching.Followme on X for real-time gold and silver market analysis: @ChmielDkWhy Gold Is Crashing? NineSessions, One ExplanationThe chainof causation is now well-established. The Federal Reserve's March 18hawkish hold - cutting 2026 rate cut projections from two to one whileciting persistent oil-driven inflation - broke the monetary policy thesis thathad underpinned gold's entire rally from $2,600 to $5,600. As TonySage, CEO of Critical Metals, puts it: "Interest rate cuts are no longerexpected in the US, while other central banks are seen as likely to hikeinterest rates in their upcoming meetings, weighing down on non-yielding assetslike gold."Theoil-inflation-rates transmission is the core mechanism. The Strait of Hormuzsituation continues to keep Brent crude elevated, reigniting inflation fearsthat force the market to price in higher-for-longer rates. The DollarIndex has surged in response, making gold - priced in dollars - simultaneouslymore expensive for international buyers and less attractive relative toyield-bearing US assets. As one Allianz scenario model noted, oil above $100per barrel could add 0.5 percentage points to US inflation, enough to keep realyields elevated and gold under sustained pressure.TheRussia-dollar pivot report from mid-February added a structural dimension tothe selling. If Russia returns to dollar settlement, one of the keyde-dollarisation narratives that drove central bank gold buying over the pasttwo years loses force. The market is now questioning whether the structuraldemand story that justified $5,600 gold was partly a narrative premiumrather than a durable fundamental.XAU/USD TechnicalAnalysis: Gold at the 200 EMA - The Last LineAs my chartshows, gold has done in a week what I expected might take a month. The previous goldanalysis identified$4,550 and $4,360 as sequential bear targets with the 200-day EMA at $4,200 asthe critical bull/bear dividing line. Both intermediate targets have been blownpast without meaningful support. Gold touched $4,100 intraday on Monday beforerebounding to $4,260, with the 200 EMA providing the first genuine buyingresponse.This istechnically significant. Officially, the uptrend remains intact - the 200 EMAhas not been broken on a daily closing basis, and that is the onlylevel that matters for trend classification. Gold has not closed below the 200EMA since late 2023. But the intraday penetration to $4,100 is a warning. IfMonday closes below $4,306 - the October 2025 historical highs- further downside becomes increasingly likely.The nextsequential targets on my bear scenario are $3,925 (theNovember 2025 lows) and ultimately my extreme bear target at $3,500 -the June 2025 highs from which the near-uninterrupted rally to $5,600 began.From Monday's $4,260, that extreme scenario represents a further decline ofapproximately 18%.For thebull case to reassert itself, gold needs to reclaim $4,550 -the late 2025 historical highs - which would open the path back toward theconsolidation near the all-time highs at $5,600. A recovery to $4,300 alone isinsufficient. The market needs to demonstrate it can hold and build above$4,550 before any recovery thesis becomes credible.Silver Below $70 - TheSupport Has FlippedThe silversituation is evolving in parallel but with even greater urgency. As I wrotein the silvercrash analysis from last Friday, the $70 level was the critical lower boundary - tested and held threetimes since the start of 2026. On Monday March 23, that support has beenbroken. Silver is trading at $64 per ounce, down nearly 6% on theday and at its lowest level since December 2025.The mostimportant technical development on the silver chart is this: $70 hasnow officially flipped from support to resistance. Three successfuldefences of a level, followed by a break, typically produce the most decisivedirectional moves in technical analysis because all the buyers who trusted thatsupport are now trapped, creating additional selling pressure on any rally thatapproaches $70 from below.The 200-dayMA at $62 is the next meaningful support, and it mirrorsexactly what gold is doing at its own 200 EMA. Silver has not yet produced adaily close below its 200 EMA, so officially the uptrend remains intact - butthe margin is thin.My nextsequential bear targets are $55 per ounce (the October 2025historical highs) and if that fails, the extreme scenario opens up considerablyfurther downside. A recovery, when it comes, needs to clear $70 first,and more convincingly $80 where the 50-day MA runs, togenerate genuine confidence that triple-digit silver prices are back in play. Below $80,even if silver stabilises, I expect further corrective pressure given howaggressively the market is positioned short on precious metals right now.Is This the End of theBull Market? The Expert ViewsRania Gule,Senior Market Analyst at XS.com, urges against a purely technical reading ofthe current situation: "This phase cannot be assessed solely throughtechnical analysis or short-term price movements - it must be viewed within abroader macroeconomic framework." Shemaintains that "gold continues to hold strong structural bullish momentumsupported by solid fundamental drivers, most notably ongoing global economicuncertainty and rising institutional demand for hedging." Her framing ofthe current decline as a "necessary correction to rebuild longpositions" is the institutional consensus view.Thestructural supports that Gule cites are real. Central bank gold purchasesremain near record levels. US fiscal deficits show no sign of narrowing. Thegeopolitical environment is genuinely elevated. GoldSilver.com's March reportmakes the case directly: "The structural case hasn't changed - centralbanks are still buying, the dollar outlook is still soft long-term, US fiscaldeficits aren't shrinking".But thereis a meaningful minority making the structural bear case. BloombergIntelligence's Mike McGlone had warned earlier this month that gold's surge"to multiyear extremes vs. most moving averages and broad commodities maysuggest the store of value has shifted to a speculative risk asset." Thatframing - gold as momentum trade rather than structural allocation - is gainingcredibility with every additional session of selling. If institutions begintreating gold as a crowded momentum position rather than a portfolio hedge, theunwind can be faster than any fundamental deterioration alone would justify.Gold and Silver PricePredictions 2026: The Revised LandscapeTheinstitutional forecasts that dominated coverage in January and February are nowbeing stress-tested against the reality of a 15-month low on gold and a 47%decline from January's silver peak. Some have been revised. Others are holdingfirm.At thebearish institutional end, Capital Economics' Hamad Hussain targets$3,500 for year-end gold - a scenario that requires the bull market tobe definitively over and the 200 EMA to be broken convincingly. Macquarieforecasts an average 2026 gold price of $4,323, implying the current levelis broadly fair value with limited upside. NAGA's bear scenario, assigned a 20%probability, targets $3,900-$4,300. State Street's bear case (20%probability) sits at $3,500-$4,000, driven by dollar stabilisationand a return to growth momentum.The bullshave not surrendered. Goldman Sachs maintains its $6,000 year-endtarget, requiring a Fed pivot and central bank demand acceleration. NAGA'sbull scenario (50% probability) targets $4,500-$5,500. State Street's basecase (50% probability) targets $4,000-$4,500 - which isessentially where gold is trading right now, suggesting the market has arrivedat fair value rather than oversold territory.FAQWhy is gold crashing inMarch 2026?Gold hasfallen for nine consecutive sessions - down approximately 15% from its Marchhigh of $5,100 - following the Federal Reserve's March 18 hawkish hold that cut2026 rate cut projections from two to one. The Strait of Hormuz oil shockreignited inflation fears that keep real yields elevated and the dollar strong,both direct headwinds for non-yielding gold. THow low can gold go?As shown onmy chart, gold is currently testing the 200-day EMA at $4,200 -the bull/bear dividing line that has not been breached on a closing basis sincelate 2023. A sustained close below $4,306 (October 2025 highs)would activate my next sequential targets: $3,925 (November2025 lows) and the extreme bear case of $3,500 (June 2025highs), representing approximately 18% further downside from Monday's $4,260. How low can silver go?Silver hasbroken below the critical $70 support level that held three times in 2026,trading at $64 per ounce on Monday March 23. That $70 level has now flipped toresistance. My next targets on the bear scenario are the 200-day MA at$62 and then the October 2025 historical highs at $55 -approximately 14% further downside from current levels. A close below the 200EMA would be a materially bearish signal, as the current trend structure hasnot yet produced one.Is the gold and silverbull market over?Notofficially - neither metal has closed below its 200-day EMA, which is thestructural line that separates bull from bear trend on my chart. Rania Gule ofXS.com argues that "gold continues to maintain strong structural bullishmomentum" with central bank buying, fiscal deficits, and geopolitical riskall still intact. This article was written by Damian Chmiel at www.financemagnates.com.