Locked vs Dynamic, How to Get Stability Without Losing RelevanceMUBARAK / TetherUSBINANCE:MUBARAKUSDTAGProLabsLocked vs Dynamic — How to Get Stability Without Losing Relevance One of the biggest reasons traders abandon auto-trendline tools is “repainting anxiety.” A line appears, shifts, disappears, then reappears somewhere else — and trust collapses. This script addresses the issue directly with stability controls: - Dynamic behavior: more reactive, adapts as new pivots form - Locked behavior: prioritizes interpretability and reduces frequent redraw How I use stability in practice: 1) Default to Locked for decision-making Locked mode helps you build a stable “structure reference” you can actually follow in real time. 2) Switch to Dynamic for study / exploration Dynamic mode can help you observe how structure evolves — but it is easier to overreact to. 3) Use “Replace vs Keep” behavior intentionally - Replace (common default): keeps structure current as the market changes - Keep broken (when available): useful for journaling, but can increase clutter A simple journaling method: - When a meaningful diagonal breaks (with your confirmation setting), capture a screenshot. - Record whether the next retest respected the old line (role flip) or ignored it. - After 20–30 samples, you learn which environments are stable vs chaotic. Key point: No structure tool can “freeze reality” without losing relevance. Stability controls exist so you can choose the right compromise for your workflow. Limitations: Even in Locked mode, structure can evolve as new pivots confirm. This is expected in pivot-driven analysis. Risk disclosure: Educational content only. Not financial advice.