The Nationalist Party declined to say whether it still believes Judge Wenzu Mintoff should be appointed Malta’s next chief justice, citing “confidentiality reasons.”The PN had proposed Mintoff for the post on 21st February. However, Times of Malta reported that it was informed that while the nomination was submitted on that date, the letter was backdated to 20th February, the same day Mintoff sent a separate five-page letter to cabinet containing allegations made under oath against Prime Minister Robert Abela.In his letter, Mintoff requested that Abela recuse himself from talks and decisions related to the chief justice appointment, claiming the prime minister was biased against him. Among the claims, Mintoff said he had met Abela to discuss the role.Abela later confirmed the meeting took place, but said there was nothing unethical about discussing the appointment with members of the judiciary. He also claimed PN MP Joe Giglio had met members of the judiciary to ask if they were interested in the post.The PN has denied knowing about Mintoff’s letter before submitting its nomination, stating that his “professional integrity, long-standing service, and commitment to due process” formed the basis of its consideration.Asked whether the party still stands by Mintoff’s nomination in light of recent developments, Giglio said he would not comment, insisting such discussions must remain confidential, including when a nominee is no longer being considered.Times of Malta was also informed that the PN has not formally withdrawn Mintoff’s name.Opposition leader Alex Borg has said it is “crucial” for discussions on the appointment to continue privately. Meanwhile, Justice Minister Jonathan Attard said he is awaiting feedback from the PN on the government’s latest nominee, Madam Justice Miriam Hayman.The appointment of a new chief justice requires bipartisan agreement, with talks ongoing behind closed doors.What do you make of this?•