Breakout vs Reaction - Deterministic Alert SemanticsEthereum / TetherUSBINANCE:ETHUSDTAGProLabsBreakout vs Reaction - Deterministic Alert Semantics for Cleaner Decisions Most “alert spam” comes from unclear definitions. If you don’t define what counts as a break, you will overreact to wicks. AG Pro Dynamic Channels Elite uses deterministic alert semantics centered on the channel BASE line: - Breakout: a confirmed violation of the base (typically by candle close). - Reaction: a probe through the base (wick) followed by a close back into structure. This separation matters: - Breakout is a “structure invalidation” event → reassess context. - Reaction is a “structure respect” event → observe continuation vs failure. Alert hygiene controls (the real upgrade): 1) Confirm Mode - Auto (follows message frequency) - Intrabar (faster, noisier) - Close (cleanest, recommended for most workflows) 2) Trigger Buffer Off / ATR / Ticks Buffers reduce micro-wick triggers in choppy regimes. 3) Cooldown (bars) Prevents repeated alerts from the same channel family in a short window. This reduces emotional churn and decision fatigue. 4) Payload Mode (Text vs JSON) Text for human reading; JSON for webhook workflows (clean single-line payload). Professional tip: Alerts should automate attention, not execution. When an alert fires, your job is to open the chart and evaluate risk, regime, and invalidation. Risk disclosure: Educational content only. Not financial advice. Breaks and reactions can fail; overshoots are normal in volatility expansion.